Note
Studied by 39526 peopleNoteStudied by 242 peopleNoteStudied by 1 personNoteStudied by 206 peopleNoteStudied by 22 peopleNoteStudied by 55 peopleFilm 20
Week 2: Editing: Continuity vs. Collision
Main Point:The main point of David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson's "Continuity Editing" is to explain how the system of continuity editing serves as a key tool in narrative filmmaking, ensuring a coherent flow of space, time, and action across multiple shots. Continuity editing, developed around the early 1900s, helps maintain the viewer's understanding of the narrative by following established rules such as the 180-degree rule, match on action, and eyeline matches.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Continuity Editing Purpose:
Continuity editing ensures that the viewer can follow the spatial and temporal relationships between shots, creating a coherent and smooth narrative. The primary objective is to allow the action, space, and time to appear continuous across cuts, maintaining a seamless narrative flow.
Key Concepts:
180-Degree Rule: The 180-degree rule maintains spatial consistency. The camera stays on one side of an imaginary axis, so characters maintain their positions relative to one another, preventing disorientation.
Example: In Strike (1925), a wheel swinging toward a foreman is depicted from multiple angles, while still adhering to this rule, ensuring the audience is not confused by character placement.
Match on Action: A cut made while a character is in the middle of an action, ensuring that the action continues fluidly from one shot to the next.
Example: In The Maltese Falcon, when Brigid O'Shaughnessy enters Spade's office, the movement of her walking across the room is shown from two different angles without breaking the flow of movement.
Eyeline Match: This editing technique ensures that when a character looks off-screen, the following shot shows what they are looking at, creating a connection between shots.
Example: In The Birds (1963), Melanie looks at attacking birds, and the following shot shows the birds in action, making the viewer feel the continuity between her gaze and the event.
Narrative Continuity:
Continuity editing aligns the story’s cause and effect, allowing viewers to focus on the narrative without being distracted by jarring cuts or confusing shifts in character positions or movements. The system helps filmmakers guide the audience’s attention to specific actions and character reactions in a way that supports the overall narrative structure.
Summary for Learning:
Continuity editing is essential in guiding the audience through a film's story without causing confusion. It relies on rules such as the 180-degree line, match on action, and eyeline matches to keep spatial and temporal relationships clear across shots. By adhering to these rules, filmmakers can create a seamless narrative experience that enhances emotional engagement and helps audiences follow the cause-and-effect logic of the story. Key examples from films like Strike and The Maltese Falcon show how these techniques help ensure clarity and coherence in storytelling.
Main Point:
In David Bordwell's “Classical Hollywood Cinema: Narrational Principles and Procedures”, the primary focus is on the structured, goal-driven nature of classical Hollywood narratives. This type of cinema relies on psychologically defined characters, a clear progression of cause and effect, and structured resolutions. The narrative structure of these films is built to be transparent, with a focus on guiding viewers smoothly through the story using well-defined characters, clear objectives, and a predictable resolution.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Psychologically Defined Characters:
Characters in classical Hollywood cinema are clearly defined, often centered on a protagonist with clear goals. These characters face conflicts that drive the plot forward, and their actions are causally linked to the development of the narrative.
Example: A hero in a film may have two primary goals: resolving a conflict (such as winning a battle or finishing a mission) and achieving a romantic relationship.
Causal Relationships:
The narrative structure is based on cause-and-effect relationships. Each event in the film must logically follow the previous one, leading to a coherent and engaging storyline.
Example: The structure often includes a disturbance in the initial situation, followed by a struggle, and ends with the resolution of the disturbance (such as solving a mystery or overcoming a challenge).
Double Plot Line:
Many classical Hollywood films use a double causal structure, where the primary plot (such as a mission or a conflict) is paired with a secondary romantic plot. The resolution of one often triggers the resolution of the other.
Example: In many films, a character achieves their goal and simultaneously resolves their romantic relationship by the film's conclusion.
Narration and Audience Guidance:
Classical Hollywood cinema is built to ensure that viewers easily understand the story. The narrative rarely withholds important information from the audience, and scenes are often structured to ensure clarity, using techniques like establishing shots or explanatory dialogue.
Example: Scenes may end with clear cues, such as a clock indicating the time remaining or a character discussing a deadline, helping the audience stay oriented within the narrative’s timeline.
Resolution and Closure:
Films in the classical Hollywood tradition often end with a clear resolution, where all major plot points are addressed. Even if minor plot points are left unresolved, the main conflict and the character’s primary goals are concluded.
Example: In the final moments of a film, characters might tie up loose ends in their personal lives, such as reconciling with a loved one or achieving a major life goal.
Summary for Learning:
Classical Hollywood cinema revolves around a structured, goal-oriented narrative style where the protagonist faces clear conflicts and pursues defined objectives. The film's progression relies heavily on cause and effect, guiding viewers through the story with psychological clarity and a well-structured resolution. Key elements include the double plotline (often combining romance with another major conflict), a focus on causal relationships, and an emphasis on providing clear and engaging closure for the audience.
SCREENING: Strike (dir. Sergei Eisenstein, 1925)
In "A Dialectic Approach to Film Form", Sergei Eisenstein emphasizes the idea that art, particularly film, is fundamentally built on conflict. He proposes that the essence of filmmaking lies in the collision of opposing forces or ideas, which he defines as the principle of "dialectical montage." Through this method, film can create meaning and elicit emotional and intellectual responses by juxtaposing contrasting shots, images, or ideas. Eisenstein's approach draws heavily on Marxist dialectics, advocating for film to not merely depict reality but to transform and reinterpret it through dynamic opposition.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Dialectical Method in Film:
Eisenstein argues that the foundation of art, and particularly film, lies in conflict. This is expressed in the form of dialectical montage, where the meaning of the film arises from the interaction and clash of opposing shots or ideas.
Example: In Strike (1925), Eisenstein famously intercuts scenes of workers being massacred with images of cattle being slaughtered. This montage creates a powerful metaphor by contrasting two seemingly unrelated but symbolically connected events.
Montage as a Tool for Generating Meaning:
Eisenstein believes that montage is not just about editing shots together; it is about creating new meaning from the collision of shots. Montage generates ideas by combining images that, when placed in opposition, produce something greater than the sum of their parts.
Example: In Battleship Potemkin (1925), the rapid juxtaposition of different shots in the "Odessa Steps" sequence, such as a mother’s death and the advancing soldiers, intensifies the emotional impact and highlights the brutality of the massacre.
Montage Types:
Eisenstein categorizes various forms of montage, including metric montage (based on the length of shots), rhythmic montage (based on the visual content and rhythm within the shot), tonal montage (focused on the emotional tone), and intellectual montage (designed to create conceptual ideas through contrasting images).
Example: The use of intellectual montage in October (1928), where Eisenstein intercuts images of a religious icon with contrasting depictions of other gods, challenges the viewer to think critically about the relationship between religion and revolution.
Conflict as the Driving Force of Art:
Eisenstein emphasizes that art, especially film, thrives on conflict—whether it is conflict between shots, emotions, ideas, or visual elements. This conflict is essential to creating dynamic and engaging works of art that challenge and engage the audience both emotionally and intellectually.
Example: In October, Eisenstein uses conflicting imagery of Napoleon statues and collapsing military symbols to critique the illusions of political power.
Montage as a Dialectical Process:
Eisenstein draws from Marxist dialectics, particularly the concept of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. He sees montage as a dialectical process where two opposing shots (thesis and antithesis) collide to form a new, synthesized meaning (synthesis).
Example: In Strike, the clash of images between the slaughterhouse and the worker massacre serves as a critique of the capitalist system, synthesizing a new understanding of oppression and violence.
Summary for Learning:
Eisenstein's dialectical approach to film emphasizes conflict as the core of cinematic art. His theory of montage argues that by juxtaposing contrasting shots, filmmakers can create new meanings that transcend the individual images. This method allows films to engage the audience on both emotional and intellectual levels, using the Marxist dialectical framework of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis to drive narrative and thematic development. Eisenstein’s pioneering work, as seen in films like Strike and Battleship Potemkin, exemplifies how montage can be used not only to convey powerful messages but also to revolutionize cinematic language.
Dialectical montage is when two very different images are shown one after the other to make the audience think about how they are connected, creating a new idea from that contrast.
Week 3: Realism and the Ontology of Cinema
Main Point:
In André Bazin's "The Ontology of the Photographic Image", the main argument is that photography and cinema uniquely capture reality, presenting images with an objective relationship to the world. Bazin contends that the photographic image preserves a moment in time with a direct connection to reality, which separates it from other forms of art that rely more heavily on subjective interpretation.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Realism in Photography and Cinema:
Bazin argues that photography is fundamentally different from painting and other art forms because it directly captures a moment from reality, rather than being interpreted through the hand of an artist. Cinema, as an extension of photography, also captures this objective reality, making it a unique medium for representing the real world.
Example: A photograph of a person is more than just an interpretation—it is a physical trace of that moment in time, unlike a painted portrait that reflects an artist’s vision.
The "Mummy Complex":
Bazin introduces the idea of the "mummy complex," suggesting that humans have a desire to preserve life and moments in time, which has led to the creation of art forms like painting and sculpture. Photography and cinema fulfill this desire more effectively because they literally capture life as it is.
Example: Early portraits, whether through sculpture or painting, attempted to preserve the likeness of a person, but a photograph directly captures their presence in a moment.
Cinema’s Evolution of Art:
According to Bazin, cinema is the culmination of the quest for realism in art. While earlier forms of art, like painting, could only suggest reality, cinema can present a reproduction of reality with time, movement, and space, making it more lifelike and authentic.
Example: A film scene that captures real-time movement, such as a person walking through a city, not only presents the visual aspect but also the flow of time, making it more immersive and realistic.
Summary for Learning:
Bazin’s essay argues that photography and cinema are unique in their ability to capture and preserve reality, fulfilling a deep human need to immortalize moments in time. Photography is not just an imitation of the world but a direct imprint of reality itself. Cinema extends this by adding time and movement, making it a more complete representation of the real world than other forms of art like painting or sculpture.
Main Point:
In Béla Balázs's "The Close-Up", he emphasizes the significance of the close-up in film as a powerful tool for revealing deeper emotional and psychological layers of both characters and objects. The close-up allows filmmakers to capture the subtleties of human expression and the hidden life of objects, offering a way to visually communicate aspects of life that are not readily apparent in wider shots.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Close-Up as a Window to the Soul:
Balázs argues that the close-up enables filmmakers to capture emotions and expressions that are otherwise invisible in wider shots. The close-up isolates the face, revealing intricate details of a character’s inner life, such as fear, tension, or excitement.
Example: A trembling hand or a nervous glance can reveal internal turmoil far more effectively than a medium or wide shot, allowing the viewer to connect deeply with the character's emotions.
Revealing the Hidden Life of Objects:
The close-up not only exposes human emotions but also gives life to inanimate objects. By magnifying everyday things, the camera can show how objects participate in the story or reflect the emotions of the characters.
Example: A door creaking open in a close-up may suggest danger or suspense, adding to the narrative without words.
Psychological and Dramatic Power:
Close-ups provide a deeper psychological insight into the characters by capturing the smallest gestures and facial expressions. This focus on micro-expressions and small movements makes the viewer feel a direct connection with the character’s internal experience.
Example: A close-up of trembling fingers nervously gripping an object can express internal anxiety, creating a dramatic impact that goes beyond dialogue.
Lyrical and Poetic Quality of Close-Ups:
Balázs views the close-up as more than a narrative device; he believes it has a lyrical and poetic quality, allowing the audience to see objects and people with a fresh, more intimate perspective. It conveys emotions through subtle visual details that enrich the storytelling.
Example: In a romantic scene, a close-up of a flower or a meaningful glance can evoke a tender emotion that expands the viewer's understanding of the characters' relationship.
Summary for Learning:
Béla Balázs emphasizes that close-ups are crucial in film for capturing the deeper emotional and psychological nuances of both characters and objects. They provide insight into the hidden emotions of characters and give life to inanimate objects, turning them into symbols or reflections of internal states. The close-up is not only a tool for enhancing dramatic tension but also a lyrical and poetic device that can evoke powerful emotions through visual detail. By focusing on micro-expressions and subtle gestures, close-ups enrich the storytelling, allowing the audience to connect with the film on a more intimate level.
Main Point:
In André Bazin's "The Evolution of the Language of Cinema", Bazin explores how cinema evolved with the introduction of sound and the impact it had on cinematic language. He contrasts the techniques of silent film, which relied heavily on montage and expressionism, with the more realistic techniques of sound cinema, such as deep focus and long takes. Bazin argues that while montage creates meaning through editing, sound cinema offers a more direct and faithful representation of reality, ultimately enriching the viewer’s experience.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Introduction of Sound and its Impact:
Bazin argues that sound did not destroy the aesthetics of silent cinema but enriched it. He explains that while some feared sound would reduce the art to mere realism, it actually expanded cinema’s ability to represent reality in a more complete way.
Example: Sound films like Citizen Kane (1941) make use of deep focus and sound to create a richer, more immersive narrative without relying on heavy montage techniques.
Montage vs. Long Takes and Deep Focus:
Bazin contrasts montage, which creates meaning by juxtaposing images through editing, with the long take and deep focus, which allow multiple layers of meaning within a single shot. He sees the long take as a more authentic representation of reality, as it allows the audience to explore the mise-en-scène without the intervention of rapid cuts.
Example: Orson Welles’ use of deep focus in Citizen Kane allows the viewer to see multiple planes of action within the same shot, creating a more complex and layered narrative without the need for montage.
Realism in Cinema:
Bazin advocates for realism in cinema, where the camera captures reality without manipulation. He believes that the use of deep focus, long takes, and sound provides a more direct engagement with reality, allowing the audience to interpret the scene without the imposed meaning of montage.
Example: Films like The Bicycle Thieves (1948) use minimal editing to create a sense of real time and space, giving the viewer the experience of witnessing events as they unfold naturally.
Summary for Learning:
Bazin’s essay highlights the evolution of cinema with the advent of sound, emphasizing how it transformed cinematic language. He contrasts the heavy reliance on montage in silent films with the long takes and deep focus that became possible with sound cinema. Bazin argues that these techniques, especially deep focus, offer a more authentic and complex representation of reality, allowing audiences to engage with the narrative more deeply. He sees this evolution as a shift from manipulating reality through editing to capturing it more truthfully, enriching the cinematic experience.
SCREENING: Taste of Cherry(dir. Abbas Kiarostami, 1997)
Week 4: Ideology
Main Point:
In Roland Barthes’ "The Rhetoric of the Image", Barthes examines how images communicate meaning through a complex system of signs, specifically focusing on advertising images. He argues that images can be read on multiple levels—denotative (literal) and connotative (cultural or symbolic)—and that these meanings are constructed through culturally coded messages. Barthes discusses how linguistic messages (like captions) help anchor the meaning of an image by limiting its interpretations, while also exploring how images carry cultural connotations that shape how viewers interpret them.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Denotative and Connotative Levels of Meaning:
Barthes explains that images operate on two levels: the denotative level, which is the literal, straightforward content of the image (what is actually depicted), and the connotative level, which refers to the cultural or symbolic meanings that are interpreted based on societal norms and values.
Example: In an advertisement for pasta, the image may show ingredients like tomatoes and pasta (denotation), but it also evokes Italian culture, freshness, and home-cooked meals (connotation).
Polysemy and Anchorage:
Barthes discusses how images are polysemous, meaning they can have multiple interpretations. To avoid confusion, anchorage is used, often in the form of text, to direct the viewer toward a specific interpretation and limit the number of possible meanings.
Example: A caption in an advertisement for fruit might say “fresh from the garden,” guiding the viewer to associate the image with naturalness, rather than scarcity or artificiality.
Cultural Codes in Image Interpretation:
The connotative meaning of an image is constructed through cultural codes, which are shared understandings that influence how viewers interpret visual signs. These codes vary based on social, historical, and personal contexts.
Example: In the Panzani advertisement analyzed by Barthes, the use of colors (red, yellow, green) and the string bag evoke the idea of Italianicity—a culturally coded idea of Italian life, food, and tradition.
Summary for Learning:
Barthes’ essay argues that images communicate through both their literal content and the symbolic meanings they evoke. Advertisements, for instance, are constructed using a system of culturally coded signs, and their meanings can be guided by the use of text or captions, which anchor specific interpretations. The idea that images are polysemous—open to multiple readings—highlights the complexity of visual communication, where both denotation and connotation play key roles. By understanding these cultural codes, viewers can better interpret the deeper, often hidden, meanings conveyed by images.
Main Point:
In Roland Barthes’ "The Rhetoric of the Image", Barthes examines how images communicate meaning through a complex system of signs, specifically focusing on advertising images. He argues that images can be read on multiple levels—denotative (literal) and connotative (cultural or symbolic)—and that these meanings are constructed through culturally coded messages. Barthes discusses how linguistic messages (like captions) help anchor the meaning of an image by limiting its interpretations, while also exploring how images carry cultural connotations that shape how viewers interpret them.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Denotative and Connotative Levels of Meaning:
Barthes explains that images operate on two levels: the denotative level, which is the literal, straightforward content of the image (what is actually depicted), and the connotative level, which refers to the cultural or symbolic meanings that are interpreted based on societal norms and values.
Example: In an advertisement for pasta, the image may show ingredients like tomatoes and pasta (denotation), but it also evokes Italian culture, freshness, and home-cooked meals (connotation).
Polysemy and Anchorage:
Barthes discusses how images are polysemous, meaning they can have multiple interpretations. To avoid confusion, anchorage is used, often in the form of text, to direct the viewer toward a specific interpretation and limit the number of possible meanings.
Example: A caption in an advertisement for fruit might say “fresh from the garden,” guiding the viewer to associate the image with naturalness, rather than scarcity or artificiality.
Cultural Codes in Image Interpretation:
The connotative meaning of an image is constructed through cultural codes, which are shared understandings that influence how viewers interpret visual signs. These codes vary based on social, historical, and personal contexts.
Example: In the Panzani advertisement analyzed by Barthes, the use of colors (red, yellow, green) and the string bag evoke the idea of Italianicity—a culturally coded idea of Italian life, food, and tradition.
Summary for Learning:
Barthes’ essay argues that images communicate through both their literal content and the symbolic meanings they evoke. Advertisements, for instance, are constructed using a system of culturally coded signs, and their meanings can be guided by the use of text or captions, which anchor specific interpretations. The idea that images are polysemous—open to multiple readings—highlights the complexity of visual communication, where both denotation and connotation play key roles. By understanding these cultural codes, viewers can better interpret the deeper, often hidden, meanings conveyed by images.
Main Point:
In Roland Barthes' "Mythologies", particularly in excerpts like “The Great Family of Man” and “Wine and Milk”, Barthes examines how everyday cultural objects and practices are imbued with ideological meanings, transforming them into myths. These myths take culturally specific practices and present them as natural, universal truths, obscuring the historical and social conditions behind them. Barthes aims to deconstruct these myths and reveal the ways in which they reinforce dominant ideologies, particularly those of the bourgeoisie.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Myth as a Form of Speech:
Barthes argues that myth is a type of language, a system of communication that distorts reality by making social and cultural constructs appear as natural. This process of "naturalization" serves to depoliticize historical events, making them seem inevitable or unchangeable.
Example: In "The Great Family of Man," Barthes critiques a photography exhibition that portrays human experiences—such as birth, death, and work—as universal and timeless, ignoring the historical and social contexts that shape these experiences. The images reduce complex social realities to oversimplified, sentimental expressions of humanism.
The Bourgeois Norm as Universal:
Barthes often points to how bourgeois ideology disguises itself as "common sense" or natural law. This masking allows the bourgeoisie to perpetuate their worldview without appearing ideological.
Example: In "Wine and Milk," Barthes deconstructs how wine is mythologized in French culture as a symbol of natural vitality, masculinity, and Frenchness, despite its social and economic implications. It becomes a "totem drink" representing something culturally essential, though its production and consumption are tied to capitalist interests.
Depoliticization of Cultural Practices:
Myth serves to depoliticize culture, removing the social and historical context from cultural phenomena and turning them into mere objects of admiration or tradition. This allows cultural practices to be presented as neutral or benign, masking their deeper ideological functions.
Example: In "The Great Family of Man," the portrayal of birth and death as universal experiences ignores the social inequalities that shape these events. Barthes argues that by presenting these experiences outside their historical context, the exhibit hides the social injustices that are part of these human experiences.
Summary for Learning:
Barthes' Mythologies examines how everyday objects and cultural practices are transformed into myths that reinforce dominant ideologies. By presenting culturally specific phenomena as universal and natural, these myths obscure the social and historical conditions that produce them, depoliticizing them in the process. Barthes deconstructs these myths to reveal how they serve to reinforce bourgeois ideology, offering examples like the sentimentalized portrayal of humanity in "The Great Family of Man" and the symbolic status of wine in French culture. Understanding these mechanisms helps to critically examine how culture communicates ideology.
Main Point:
In Stuart Hall’s essay “Encoding/Decoding”, Hall presents a model for understanding mass communication by examining how media messages are produced and interpreted. He argues that media texts are encoded with meaning by their producers and then decoded by audiences, but the meanings derived by audiences may not align with the intended message. Hall introduces three decoding positions—dominant, negotiated, and oppositional—depending on the viewer's cultural and social context.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Encoding and Decoding Model:
Hall describes the communication process as one of encoding (production of messages) and decoding (reception and interpretation). The encoding process involves embedding preferred meanings into media texts, while decoding is the interpretation of these messages by the audience. However, there is no guarantee that the decoded meaning will match the encoded message.
Example: A news broadcast may be encoded with a particular political bias, but different viewers will decode it according to their own ideological positions.
Three Decoding Positions:
Hall identifies three possible positions from which audiences decode media messages:
Dominant-Hegemonic Position: The audience fully accepts the preferred reading encoded in the text.
Example: A viewer watches a government public service announcement and agrees with the message without questioning it.
Negotiated Position: The audience accepts parts of the preferred meaning but adapts it to fit their own context.
Example: A worker might agree with the need to control inflation but reject the idea that wage freezes are the best way to achieve this.
Oppositional Position: The audience completely rejects the preferred reading and interprets the message in an entirely different way.
Example: A viewer watches a news segment on economic policies and decodes the message as class oppression, rejecting the legitimacy of the news report.
Polysemy and the Complexity of Meaning:
Hall emphasizes that media texts are polysemic, meaning they can have multiple interpretations depending on the social, cultural, and ideological background of the audience. This creates a range of potential meanings that are negotiated through the decoding process.
Example: A commercial for a luxury car may be seen by one viewer as aspirational and by another as an example of excessive consumerism.
Summary for Learning:
Stuart Hall’s “Encoding/Decoding” introduces a non-linear communication model where media producers encode messages with intended meanings, but audiences decode them based on their social and cultural contexts. The three decoding positions—dominant, negotiated, and oppositional—explain how individuals engage with media texts, either accepting, modifying, or rejecting the intended message. Hall’s framework highlights the complex and active role of audiences in meaning-making, challenging traditional models that assume a passive reception of media content.
SCREENING: Color Adjustment (Links to an external site.dir. Marlon Riggs, 1992)
Week 5: The Gaze
Main Point:
In Laura Mulvey’s “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, Mulvey explores how traditional Hollywood cinema reinforces the male gaze by positioning women as passive objects of visual pleasure for active male spectators. Drawing from psychoanalytic theory, Mulvey argues that women in cinema are objectified through "scopophilia" (pleasure in looking) and narcissistic identification, creating a visual structure that upholds patriarchal power. She calls for a new kind of filmmaking that challenges these conventions and disrupts the male-dominated ways of looking.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
The Male Gaze and Scopophilia:
Mulvey argues that in mainstream cinema, men are active viewers (the "bearers of the look"), while women are passive objects meant to be looked at. This dynamic is central to what she terms the male gaze, which controls the narrative and the way the audience views female characters.
Example: In Vertigo (1958), Scottie’s obsessive control over Madeleine reflects the male gaze. He shapes her appearance and actions to match his fantasy, reducing her to an object of his visual pleasure.
Narcissism and Identification:
Mulvey also draws on psychoanalytic theory, particularly Lacan’s concept of the mirror stage, to explain how male viewers identify with male characters on screen. This identification reinforces the viewer's ego, allowing them to live vicariously through the protagonist's control over women and events.
Example: In Rear Window (1954), Jeffries, the male protagonist, becomes a stand-in for the male audience, watching others from a distance and controlling the narrative through his gaze.
Women as Fetish and Threat:
Mulvey suggests that women in film often embody a dual role: as a fetishized object of beauty and as a symbol of castration anxiety for male characters. Men respond to this anxiety either by punishing the woman (sadistic voyeurism) or fetishizing her to neutralize the threat.
Example: In Marnie (1964), Marnie is both fetishized for her beauty and punished for her crimes, embodying the dual role Mulvey describes.
Summary for Learning:
Mulvey’s “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” critiques traditional Hollywood cinema for reinforcing patriarchal power through the male gaze, where men are active participants, and women are passive objects of visual pleasure. Drawing on psychoanalysis, she explains how male viewers identify with male protagonists and how women are fetishized or punished to alleviate the male fear of castration. Films like Vertigo, Rear Window, and Marnie exemplify these dynamics, where women are either controlled or objectified, reinforcing male dominance in the cinematic experience.
Main Point:
In bell hooks' “The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectators”, hooks examines how Black women develop an oppositional gaze to resist and critique the absence and misrepresentation of Blackness in mainstream cinema. She highlights how Black female spectators, denied positive representations in media, cultivate a critical way of viewing that challenges the dominant white, patriarchal lens. hooks' analysis also points to the power of looking as a form of resistance, whereby Black women reclaim their agency by not passively consuming the images presented to them.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
The Oppositional Gaze as a Tool for Resistance:
hooks introduces the idea of the oppositional gaze, a form of resistance developed by Black female spectators. This gaze emerges from the experience of being misrepresented or not represented at all in mainstream media, leading Black women to watch films critically, often from a distance, to counter the dominant narrative.
Example: In her essay, hooks describes how Black viewers critiqued shows like Amos 'n' Andy and mainstream representations of Blackness, recognizing the stereotypes while also developing independent Black cinema in response.
The Politics of Looking:
hooks argues that historically, the act of looking has been political for Black people, particularly for enslaved individuals who were often punished for looking at their oppressors. In cinema, the gaze has been a site of power and control, with Black women learning to critically engage with or reject the white patriarchal gaze imposed on them by mainstream media.
Example: hooks refers to how Black men were punished or even lynched for "looking" at white women, which contrasts with their objectifying and dominating the white women in cinema. Black women’s act of looking, therefore, becomes an act of defiance.
Intersection of Race, Gender, and Representation:
hooks points out that mainstream feminist film theory often neglects to address the unique experience of Black female spectatorship. Feminist criticism has traditionally focused on gender, failing to account for how race and racism further complicate the cinematic representation of women. Black women, hooks argues, must navigate both their race and gender when engaging with media.
Example: hooks critiques films where Black women are portrayed in ways that support white female empowerment while marginalizing Black experiences, such as Gone with the Wind or Imitation of Life.
Summary for Learning:
bell hooks' “The Oppositional Gaze” highlights the critical and resistant stance of Black female spectatorship in response to their marginalization and misrepresentation in mainstream cinema. The oppositional gaze allows Black women to assert agency by rejecting and challenging the white, patriarchal cinematic gaze, while also advocating for alternative representations through independent Black cinema. hooks emphasizes that the intersection of race and gender must be considered in any discussion of spectatorship, as Black women’s experiences of looking differ significantly from those of both Black men and white women.
SCREENING: Vertigo(dir. Alfred Hitchcock, 1958);
screening: Lip (Links to an external site.dir. Tracey Moffatt, 1999, 10 min.)
Week 6: Counter-Cinema
Main Point:
Julio García Espinosa’s “For an Imperfect Cinema” argues for a cinema that prioritizes political engagement and social relevance over technical perfection. He calls for films that serve the people, fostering participation and collective creation, rather than catering to the tastes of an elite audience focused on aesthetic beauty.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Imperfect Cinema’s Social Role:
Espinosa emphasizes that cinema should reflect the struggles and experiences of ordinary people. The aim is not technical excellence but to inspire political consciousness and social change.
Example: A low-budget documentary about a workers' strike may be more impactful in sparking social action than a polished Hollywood film with no social message.
Participation and Collaboration:
Imperfect cinema encourages active participation, not just from filmmakers but also from audiences. Viewers should engage with the content, challenge it, and even contribute to the filmmaking process.
Example: Community filmmaking projects where local residents contribute to the narrative or production process reflect Espinosa’s vision of participatory cinema.
Rejection of Elitist Aestheticism:
Espinosa critiques traditional cinema for being elitist and detached from real social issues, favoring beauty and technical mastery over meaningful content. He believes that imperfect cinema should disrupt this elitist tradition.
Example: The notion that only high-budget, technically perfect films are “worthy” of artistic recognition is rejected in favor of raw, socially-driven cinema, even if it lacks polish.
Summary for Learning:
Espinosa’s essay calls for a revolutionary cinema that embraces imperfections to reflect the real-world struggles of ordinary people. Imperfect cinema values political engagement and participation over technical or aesthetic perfection, challenging the elitism of mainstream film. Its purpose is to inspire social change and allow the masses to take part in creating meaning.
Main Point:
In Peter Wollen’s "Godard and Counter-Cinema: Vent d'Est", Wollen examines how Jean-Luc Godard’s films, particularly Vent d’Est, break with traditional Hollywood cinema to create a “counter-cinema.” Wollen outlines the characteristics of counter-cinema, which oppose the classical norms of narrative flow, identification with characters, and visual pleasure, instead focusing on disruption, estrangement, and ideological critique.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Narrative Intransitivity:
Wollen contrasts narrative transitivity (the continuous flow of a cause-and-effect story) with narrative intransitivity, where events are fragmented and digressive. Godard disrupts traditional storytelling by breaking the linear flow, creating gaps and interruptions in the narrative.
Example: In Vent d’Est, the story lacks a coherent sequence, instead presenting disjointed flashes of events, forcing the viewer to actively reconstruct meaning.
Estrangement:
Wollen highlights Godard’s use of estrangement techniques (derived from Brecht) to prevent emotional identification with characters. Characters may directly address the audience, and voices may float away from the characters, breaking the traditional viewer-character connection.
Example: In Vent d’Est, Godard uses estrangement by having characters address the camera directly, disrupting the immersive experience and prompting the viewer to think critically about the message.
Foregrounding the Mechanics of Film:
Godard’s counter-cinema makes the mechanics of filmmaking visible, exposing the process of production rather than hiding it. This is a move away from cinema’s illusion of seamless reality.
Example: In Vent d’Est, Godard shows the camera itself in the frame and scratches the surface of the film, calling attention to the medium rather than letting the viewer forget they are watching a constructed work.
Summary for Learning:
Peter Wollen’s "Godard and Counter-Cinema" highlights the ways Godard challenges traditional Hollywood filmmaking by using narrative intransitivity, estrangement, and foregrounding the mechanics of film. In works like Vent d’Est, Godard breaks the linear narrative flow, prevents emotional identification with characters, and exposes the filmmaking process itself. These techniques invite the audience to engage critically, creating a revolutionary counter-cinema that opposes the passive consumption of mainstream films.
Main Point:
In “Speaking Nearby,” Trinh T. Minh-ha discusses the concept of speaking “nearby” a subject rather than “about” it, emphasizing the importance of indirect communication in filmmaking and cultural representation. She advocates for a more reflective and participatory approach to storytelling that resists objectifying the subject and instead acknowledges the complexity of cultural narratives and the position of the filmmaker.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Speaking Nearby vs. Speaking About:
Trinh introduces the idea of "speaking nearby," which emphasizes the importance of not objectifying or claiming ownership over the subject. Instead of positioning oneself as an authority, this approach involves speaking reflectively and acknowledging one's limitations in fully representing the subject.
Example: In her film Surname Viet Given Name Nam, Trinh uses non-linear narrative and interviews with Vietnamese women to present their stories, allowing their voices to emerge without framing them through a singular, authoritative perspective.
Poetic Language and Reflexivity:
Trinh highlights the importance of poetic language and reflexivity in filmmaking, where the filmmaker engages in self-reflection and avoids presenting cultural truths as fixed or absolute. This challenges traditional documentary methods that often seek to “capture” reality in a rigid, authoritative manner.
Example: In Reassemblage, Trinh uses fragmented images and sound to disrupt the audience’s expectations of ethnographic film, forcing them to confront their assumptions about representation.
Critique of Traditional Ethnography:
Trinh critiques traditional ethnographic methods for their tendency to objectify cultures and people, treating them as “others” to be studied and understood from an outsider's perspective. She advocates for a more participatory, fluid approach that allows for multiple voices and interpretations.
Example: Trinh’s films often eschew clear-cut explanations and instead offer open-ended reflections on culture and identity, encouraging viewers to engage with the material in a critical, self-reflective manner.
Summary for Learning:
Trinh T. Minh-ha’s “Speaking Nearby” promotes a filmmaking approach that resists objectifying its subjects, advocating for speaking nearby—an indirect, reflective engagement with cultural representation. By using poetic language and reflexivity, Trinh critiques traditional ethnography, calling for a more participatory, non-authoritative approach to storytelling. Her films like Reassemblage and Surname Viet Given Name Nam exemplify this method, challenging viewers to think critically about the nature of representation and their own role in interpreting cultural narratives.
Main Point (Simplified):
In "Speaking Nearby," Trinh T. Minh-ha explains how to talk about other cultures without claiming authority or ownership over them. Instead of "speaking about" and objectifying people, filmmakers should speak nearby, allowing for multiple perspectives and respecting the complexity of the subject. She encourages a reflective, poetic approach to filmmaking.
Key Concepts (Simplified):
Speaking Nearby: Don't act like you know everything about the subject—speak indirectly and thoughtfully.
Reflexivity: Be self-aware as a filmmaker and avoid giving fixed answers.
Critique of Ethnography: Ethnographic films often misrepresent cultures by treating them as objects to be studied. Trinh argues for a more respectful approach.
Summary:
Trinh promotes a reflective, respectful style of filmmaking where the filmmaker doesn't pretend to know everything about the subject. She calls for allowing multiple viewpoints and not oversimplifying cultures.
SCREENING: ReassemblageLinks to an external site. (dir. Trinh T. Minh-ha, 1982)
Week 8: Print Media and the Nation
Main Point:
In Imagined Communities, Benedict Anderson argues that nations are socially constructed communities, imagined by the people who perceive themselves as part of them. Nationalism, according to Anderson, emerged with the decline of religious and dynastic communities and the rise of print capitalism, which allowed people to develop shared identities through media.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Imagined Communities:
Nations are "imagined" because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, but they still believe in their shared connection.
Example: People in different regions of a country might never meet, but they share a sense of belonging through common language, history, and media.
Print Capitalism:
The development of printing technology, especially newspapers and books in vernacular languages, helped spread national consciousness by creating a shared sense of time and space among readers.
Example: Newspapers helped people in distant places feel connected to national events, building a sense of collective identity.
Decline of Religious and Dynastic Rule:
The decline of religious authority and monarchies opened the way for nations to be seen as new sources of identity. This shift allowed nationalism to rise in the place of previous loyalties.
Example: As the divine right of kings lost significance, people started imagining themselves as part of a nation with shared civic responsibilities.
The main point of Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities is that nations are not naturally formed but are created in people’s minds. Even though people in a nation may never meet, they still feel connected through shared experiences like reading the same newspapers or speaking the same language. Nationalism grew as people shifted away from old identities tied to religion or kings, and started imagining themselves as part of a larger community.
Summary for Learning:
In Imagined Communities, Anderson explains how nations are not natural entities but social constructs formed through shared media, language, and historical experiences. The development of print media played a crucial role in shaping national consciousness, replacing older sources of identity tied to religion and monarchy. Nationalism arose as people imagined themselves connected to others through their shared reading and common experiences.
Week 9: Technologies of Mass Reproduction: Photography, Film
Main Point:
In Walter Benjamin’s “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility”, Benjamin argues that advances in technology, particularly in film and photography, have altered the nature of art. As art becomes easier to reproduce, its aura—the sense of uniqueness and authenticity associated with original works—diminishes. This transformation shifts art’s role from being tied to ritual and tradition to being more accessible, political, and focused on mass exhibition.
20% Most Important Information (Using the 20/80 Rule):
Technological Reproducibility:
The ability to easily reproduce art through technology changes how it is experienced. The original aura or uniqueness of a work of art diminishes with mass reproduction, allowing for greater accessibility but reducing the connection to tradition.
Example: A painting like the Mona Lisa can now be viewed online or in prints, so its aura as a singular, original artwork fades as it becomes more widely available.
The Shift from Cult Value to Exhibition Value:
Traditionally, art was associated with religious or ritual significance (cult value), but with technological reproducibility, it becomes more about exhibition value—art is now meant to be seen by as many people as possible.
Example: Religious statues or paintings that were once hidden or reserved for sacred rituals are now displayed in museums or reproduced for the general public.
Art and Politics:
The reproducibility of art, particularly in media like film, gives it a powerful role in politics and social change. Film can be used to reach large audiences and convey political messages, challenging traditional hierarchies and ideologies.
Example: Films such as Battleship Potemkin use visual storytelling to communicate revolutionary ideas, making art a tool for political action.
Summary for Learning:
Walter Benjamin’s essay argues that as technology allows art to be easily reproduced, its aura—the uniqueness tied to its original form—diminishes, making art more about exhibition and accessibility. This shift transforms art into a tool for political and social engagement, especially through media like film, where the reproducibility allows for widespread dissemination of ideas.
SCREENING:Modern Times (dir. Charlie Chaplin, 1936)
NoteStudied by 39526 peopleNoteStudied by 242 peopleNoteStudied by 1 personNoteStudied by 206 peopleNoteStudied by 22 peopleNoteStudied by 55 people