NEGOTIATION IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT
Source: virtual Benilde
Topics Include:
Introduction
The negotiation option
The puzzle of civil war termination
The study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Historical Context:
Prior to WWII, interstate conflict was dominant in international relations.
Post-Cold War saw a shift to intrastate violence and intercommunal conflicts.
Current Trends:
Civil wars have decreased in frequency and violence over the past two decades.
Supported by studies, including the Human Security Report (Mack, 2005).
Numerous conflicts have been resolved via negotiation, e.g., in Bosnia, Northern Ireland, and South Africa.
Two Major Trends:
Decline in the onset of wars — understanding factors affecting this decline is crucial (Marshall & Gurr, 2005).
Increased interest in negotiated settlements.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Negotiation Feedback:
Growing preference for negotiation as a means of resolving disputes.
Driven by better understanding of interest-based negotiations (Fisher et al., 1991).
Focused on achieving ‘win-win’ solutions.
Historical Development:
Post-WWII saw growth in international institutions (e.g., UN, regional bodies) promoting multi-party negotiations.
Sovereignty Concerns:
States prioritize sovereignty and are reluctant to be governed by international legal institutions (Bilder, 1997).
As a result, bargaining remains the default option in disputes.
Post-WWII Dynamics:
International negotiation and diplomacy became primary methods for dispute resolution.
Influenced by advancements in nuclear technology.
Crisis Management:
Nuclear brinksmanship led to diplomatic relations and discussions to reduce tensions through agreements on arms control.
Strategic Calculations:
Realist theories highlight that balance of power, military stalemates, and domestic pressures affect negotiation prospects (Organski, 1968; Stein, 1990).
Democratic Peace Theory:
Democratic states have a tendency to resolve conflicts peacefully (Russett, 1993).
Exceptions exist with weak democracies exhibiting aggressive behaviors (Mansfield & Snyder, 1995).
Democratic Trends:
The increase in democratic states enhances the preference for diplomacy in international relations (Huntington, 1993).
Democratic Surges:
Huntington's theory on democratic waves illustrates the rise and decline of democracies globally (1800-2003).
Sovereignty & Human Rights Violations:
Sovereignty hinders challenges to status quo unless human rights are violated.
Justification for Interventions:
Interventions in conflicts often occur under humanitarian pretenses but should be a last resort after negotiation options have been exhausted.
Example: Croatian army's actions leading to independence of regions.
Intrastate Conflicts:
Civil wars saw a rise during the Cold War, with a notable decline later on.
Key Observations:
Long civil wars often end through negotiations as neither side achieves a decisive military victory (Licklider, 2005).
Cold War Context:
The end of the Cold War led superpowers to seek negotiated resolutions to end costly proxy wars.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Negotiation Intermediaries:
Small and medium-sized powers seek to mediate conflicts and facilitate negotiations.
Examples: Norway, Australia, and Switzerland.
Community Initiatives:
Organizations like the Community of Sant’ Egidio have been active mediators in various conflicts, facilitating discussions and negotiations at multiple levels.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Classification of Approaches:
Communication-based approaches emphasize dialogue and trust-building.
Realist approaches focus on utility and strategic advantages in negotiations.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Emphasis on Trust:
Changing perceptions through negotiation to foster trust and enable concessions.
Involvement of civil leaders is essential for sustainability.
Foundations of Dialogue:
Initiating informal dialogues helps build relationships before formal negotiations.
Facilitating Negotiation:
Third parties establish communication channels and frame discussions to break impasses and promote mutual understanding.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Utility Maximization:
Realists view negotiation through utility calculations, influencing behaviors and outcomes.
Factors include perceived prospects of military victory vs. negotiated settlements.
Critical Timing:
Successful negotiation requires the parties to be exhausted and seeking alternatives to continued violence.
External pressure and incentives can improve negotiation acceptance.
Careful Introduction of Benefits:
Inducements must be managed carefully to avoid unintended consequences that could undermine negotiations.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Trust & Risk in Bargaining:
Communication-based perspectives favor dialogue to build trust.
Realists argue for negotiations only when violent options are exhausted.
Conflict Phases:
Conflicts evolve through phases: rising tensions, confrontation, violence, and de-escalation.
De-escalation Dynamics:
Post-agreement may include ceasefires and formal settlements, occasionally reverting to violence.
Discussion Scenario:
Analyzing the role of the U.S. in Ukraine-Russia relations and public perception dynamics.
Key Points from Meeting:
Agreement on U.S. access to Ukraine's mineral resources in exchange for support.
Importance of security guarantees highlighted by Zelensky.
Visual Insight:
Recording of the meeting showcasing negotiation dynamics over Ukraine's situation
Summit Attendees:
Various leaders gathered to discuss commitments to Ukraine amidst ongoing tensions.
Focus Areas:
Leaders working on ceasefire plan, with emphasis on U.S. negotiations without EU involvement.
Three-Phase Structure:
Suggested phases focusing on pressure on Russia, ceasefire, and overall peace agreement.
Visual Resource:
Relevant video on Finnish President's perspectives on negotiations.
Discussion Points:
Importance of European involvement and guarantees for ceasefire reliability.
Summary of Topics:
Introduction
Negotiation option
Puzzle of civil war termination
Study of negotiation
Communication-based approaches
Realist approaches
Negotiation and the conflict cycle
Conclusion
Protagonist Behavior:
Increasing tendency for parties to negotiate due to battlefield stalemates and prolonged violence.
Third-party Assistance:
Abundance of negotiation facilitators aids resolution processes.
Successful engagement involves broad societal involvement for sustainable trust.
Cited Work:
Negotiation and International Conflict by Fen Osler Hampson, Chester A. Crocker, Pamela R. Aall