UNIT 3- CIVIL RIGHTS/ CIVIL LIBERTIES
CIVIL LIBERTIES
legal and constitutional rights that protect individuals from arbitrary acts of gov (speech, press, religion, fair trial)
selective incorporation
the Supreme Court uses due process clause of the 14th amendment to apply the specific rights of the bill of rights to the states and local Govs
selective- used when describing the piece by piece/ right by right concept of the incorporation doctrine
incorporation is a choice made by the court- judicial activism
barron v Baltimore- established the precedent that the bill of rights does not apply to states or local Govs
gitlow v New York
-often called the first incorporation case
-gitlow’s conviction was upheld but the court ruled that freedom of the press and speech are fundamental rights and liberties proved by the due process clause of the 14th amendment and the states cannot impair these rights
1ST AMENDMENT- RELIGION
establishment clause- prohibits an establishment of a national religion- separation between church and state
free exercise clause- prohibits gov from interfering w the practice of religion
ALL RIGHTS ARE LIMITED BY THE GOV
supreme court cases
engel v vitale
Wisconsin v yoder
lemon v kurtzman
Oregon v smith- jammed the use of illegal drugs in religious ceremonies
Reynolds v US- banned polygamy bc court did not want religious beliefs to supersede the laws of the land
CIVIL LIBERTIES
1ST AMENDMENT- FREE SPEECH- ALWAYS LIMITS ON FREEDOMS
schenck v US- clear and present danger
New York Times v Sullivan- written statements are only libelous when they are both false and purposely malicious
-libel- written defamation that falsely attacks a person’s good name and reputation
-slander- spoken defamation that falsely attacks a person’s good name and reputation
obscenity- immoral or indecent words or actions
roth v US- obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech
miller v California- created tests for obscenity and solidifies that obscenity is not protected
symbolic speech
tinker v des moines
-upheld freedom of speech In a school
-students and teachers do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech at the school house
texas v johnson- flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the 1st amendments
prior restraint- attempt to limit freedom or press by preventing material from being published
-near v Minnesota + New York Times company v US- court ruled that prior restrain is a violation of the 1st amedmemt protection of freedom of press
4TH AMENDMENT
wolf v colorado- incorporated the 4th amedment (not exclusionary rule)
mapp v Ohio- incorporated the exclusionary rule (evidence obtained by illegal searches or seizures from being admitted in court
6TH AMEDMENT
Gideon v wainwright- incorporated the right to an attorney
miranda v arizona- police must inform criminal suspects of their constitutional rights- read them their miranda rights when arrested
RIGHTS TO PRIVACY- THE RIGHT TO BE LEFT ALONE
Griswold v Connecticut
-ruled that the law criminalizing the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy
roe v wade- desision to obtain an abortion should be protect by the right to privacy IMPLIED by the bill of rights
CASES
Marbury v Madison 1803
McCulloch v maryland 1819
schenck v marland 1919
brown v board of education 1954
baker v Carr 1961
engel v vitale 1962
Gideon v wainwright 1963
tinker v des moines 1969
New York Times co v US 1971
Wisconsin v yoder 1972
shaw v reno 1993
US v Lopez 1995
citizens united v federal election commission 2010
mcDonald v chicago 2010
RACIAL EQUALITY
dred Scott v sandford
the reconstruction amendments
plessy v ferguson- separate but equal
brown v board of education- overturned separate but equal using the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment
civil rights act of 1964
ended Jim Crow segregation
prohibited discrimination in employment on basis of race, color, national origin religion, or gender
created the equal employment opportunity commission to monitor and enforce protections against job discrimination
eliminated the poll tax- 24th amendment
VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965
outlawed literacy tests and other discriminatory practices that had been responsible for disenfranchisement
provided for federal oversight of voter registration in areas w a history of discriminatory voting practices
reduced the owner of states in election (states generally had power over elections)
improved the voter registration disparity between whites and blacks
increased minority voting
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
a policy requiring federal agencies, universities, and most employers to take positive steps to remedy the effects of past discrimination
cases- university of California v bake, greater v Bollinger, Gratz v Bollinger
court has ruled against quota systems while affirming the right of organizations to use race as one factor among other is admissions and hiring policies
OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS POLICY
letter from Birmingham jail
14th amendment’s equal protection clause as well as other constitutional provisions have often been used to support the advancement of equality
civic participation in a representative democracy
the leadership and events associated w civil rights are evidence of how the equal protection clause can support and motivate social movements
what is a social movement?
a widely shared demand for change in some aspect of the social or political order
other policies
civil rights act of 1964
voting rights act of 1965
Americans w disabilities of 1990
equal rights amendment
24th amendment
26th amendment
title IX of the education amendment act of 1972
fair housing act 1968
executive order 11246
civil rights act of 1991
Lilly Ledbetter fair pay act of 2009
obergefell v Hodges 2015
CIVIL LIBERTIES
legal and constitutional rights that protect individuals from arbitrary acts of gov (speech, press, religion, fair trial)
selective incorporation
the Supreme Court uses due process clause of the 14th amendment to apply the specific rights of the bill of rights to the states and local Govs
selective- used when describing the piece by piece/ right by right concept of the incorporation doctrine
incorporation is a choice made by the court- judicial activism
barron v Baltimore- established the precedent that the bill of rights does not apply to states or local Govs
gitlow v New York
-often called the first incorporation case
-gitlow’s conviction was upheld but the court ruled that freedom of the press and speech are fundamental rights and liberties proved by the due process clause of the 14th amendment and the states cannot impair these rights
1ST AMENDMENT- RELIGION
establishment clause- prohibits an establishment of a national religion- separation between church and state
free exercise clause- prohibits gov from interfering w the practice of religion
ALL RIGHTS ARE LIMITED BY THE GOV
supreme court cases
engel v vitale
Wisconsin v yoder
lemon v kurtzman
Oregon v smith- jammed the use of illegal drugs in religious ceremonies
Reynolds v US- banned polygamy bc court did not want religious beliefs to supersede the laws of the land
CIVIL LIBERTIES
1ST AMENDMENT- FREE SPEECH- ALWAYS LIMITS ON FREEDOMS
schenck v US- clear and present danger
New York Times v Sullivan- written statements are only libelous when they are both false and purposely malicious
-libel- written defamation that falsely attacks a person’s good name and reputation
-slander- spoken defamation that falsely attacks a person’s good name and reputation
obscenity- immoral or indecent words or actions
roth v US- obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech
miller v California- created tests for obscenity and solidifies that obscenity is not protected
symbolic speech
tinker v des moines
-upheld freedom of speech In a school
-students and teachers do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech at the school house
texas v johnson- flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the 1st amendments
prior restraint- attempt to limit freedom or press by preventing material from being published
-near v Minnesota + New York Times company v US- court ruled that prior restrain is a violation of the 1st amedmemt protection of freedom of press
4TH AMENDMENT
wolf v colorado- incorporated the 4th amedment (not exclusionary rule)
mapp v Ohio- incorporated the exclusionary rule (evidence obtained by illegal searches or seizures from being admitted in court
6TH AMEDMENT
Gideon v wainwright- incorporated the right to an attorney
miranda v arizona- police must inform criminal suspects of their constitutional rights- read them their miranda rights when arrested
RIGHTS TO PRIVACY- THE RIGHT TO BE LEFT ALONE
Griswold v Connecticut
-ruled that the law criminalizing the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy
roe v wade- desision to obtain an abortion should be protect by the right to privacy IMPLIED by the bill of rights
CASES
Marbury v Madison 1803
McCulloch v maryland 1819
schenck v marland 1919
brown v board of education 1954
baker v Carr 1961
engel v vitale 1962
Gideon v wainwright 1963
tinker v des moines 1969
New York Times co v US 1971
Wisconsin v yoder 1972
shaw v reno 1993
US v Lopez 1995
citizens united v federal election commission 2010
mcDonald v chicago 2010
RACIAL EQUALITY
dred Scott v sandford
the reconstruction amendments
plessy v ferguson- separate but equal
brown v board of education- overturned separate but equal using the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment
civil rights act of 1964
ended Jim Crow segregation
prohibited discrimination in employment on basis of race, color, national origin religion, or gender
created the equal employment opportunity commission to monitor and enforce protections against job discrimination
eliminated the poll tax- 24th amendment
VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965
outlawed literacy tests and other discriminatory practices that had been responsible for disenfranchisement
provided for federal oversight of voter registration in areas w a history of discriminatory voting practices
reduced the owner of states in election (states generally had power over elections)
improved the voter registration disparity between whites and blacks
increased minority voting
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
a policy requiring federal agencies, universities, and most employers to take positive steps to remedy the effects of past discrimination
cases- university of California v bake, greater v Bollinger, Gratz v Bollinger
court has ruled against quota systems while affirming the right of organizations to use race as one factor among other is admissions and hiring policies
OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS POLICY
letter from Birmingham jail
14th amendment’s equal protection clause as well as other constitutional provisions have often been used to support the advancement of equality
civic participation in a representative democracy
the leadership and events associated w civil rights are evidence of how the equal protection clause can support and motivate social movements
what is a social movement?
a widely shared demand for change in some aspect of the social or political order
other policies
civil rights act of 1964
voting rights act of 1965
Americans w disabilities of 1990
equal rights amendment
24th amendment
26th amendment
title IX of the education amendment act of 1972
fair housing act 1968
executive order 11246
civil rights act of 1991
Lilly Ledbetter fair pay act of 2009
obergefell v Hodges 2015