1. What is meant by “normal” and “abnormal?” What is meant by dysfunction? How
about malfunction?
Normal:
Statistically Normal - The average/mean or mode
Socially Normal - Conforming to the standard or the common type; usual for a particular context (socially normal) or person
Abnormal:
Statistically Abnormal - ex. Low or high IQ
Socially Abnormal - ex. Philately (collection of postage stamps)
Dysfunction:
An impairment in the function that is making it not happen (e.g. a heart attack is caused by the heart being impaired of its normal/regular functions)
Malfunction:
When a function is happening, but it's the wrong one (e.g. cancer, cells doing things that they shouldn’t)
a. In what situations does the dysfunction account of psychopathology fall
short?
Ex. Hallucinations in a cultural context (not a behavior disorder)
b. What is meant by the subjective distress account of psyIndividual’s verbal and
Non-verbal reports of pain, suffering, upset, etc
c. What might be one problem with relying on one’s report of distress to
categorize someone as mentally ill or not? Be sure to know what malingering is and in what situations it is likely to occur
Distress is not always considered a symptom of disorder
Ex. intense physical activity or reacting to bad news
Malingering - an individual who is pretending to have a disorder that they do not have
2. How do social norms influence the definition and diagnosis of mental illness?
Social norms evolve over time, leading to changes in what is considered a mental illness (ex. Homosexuality used to be in DSM)
“Normal” and “abnormal” mean different things in different cultures
Stigma surrounding mental illnesses
a. What functions do social and political factors serve?
Societies set norms for what is acceptable behavior
(ex. hyperactivity in children may be seen as normal in some cultures but as a symptom of ADHD in others)
Decisions on what constitutes a disorder often involve social and political debate
(ex. homosexuality was removed from the DSM in 1973 due to activism and shifting social attitudes rather than scientific discovery)
3. What is neurodiversity and how does it factor into our understanding of behavior
Disorders?
Neurodiversity: Variation in the human brain with respect to learning, attention, mood, sociability, and other mental processes and operations
Traditional models classify conditions like ADHD and autism as deficits based on deviations from the "normal" brain. The neurodiversity movement argues that these conditions are variations in cognitive processing rather than inherently pathological
Instead of seeing traits like hyperfocus in ADHD or intense pattern recognition in autism as impairments, neurodiversity highlights how these traits can be strengths in the right environments
4. What are the two components of the harmful dysfunction model and what are
some of the problems with this model? What term did Widiger and Sankis (2000)
propose instead and what does it mean?
Behavior disorders are comprised of two components
Harmfulness (Social): The impairment in function is seen to be harmful to the individual and/or society
Dysfunction (Biological): Breakdown or impairment in the natural function of behavior
Problems: Who decides what is harmful?
Widiger and Sankis proposed instead “Dyscontrolled Maladaptivity”
5. What is the purpose of classification; that is, why do we need a classification
system for behavior disorders?
Regarding mental health, classification systems provide:
Nomenclature for practitioners, to be able to define and speak to one another in the same language
Descriptive psychopathology - looking at the phenomenon and observing (have to be observing the same thing, talking about the same thing)
Epidemiology - to whom is this happening and where (could give us a sense of why)
Etiological theories - how does this start and develop over time?
Sociopolitical functions
Basis for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment
Ultimate goal is utility
6. Understand the different models of behavior disorders throughout time (e.g.,
biological, moral, supernatural), how they have influenced classification and their
current standing in terms of how they inform our understanding of behavior
disorders
Biological:
Suggests that behavioral disorders are caused by biological abnormalities, such as genetics, brain chemistry, and neuroanatomy
Led to DSM, diagnosis based on medical symptoms
Moral:
Developed in response to harsh asylum conditions, this model emphasized treating individuals with kindness, compassion, and humane care
Advocated for the removal of cruel and unusual treatments
Supernatural:
Behavioral disorders were believed to be caused by supernatural forces, such as demonic possession, witchcraft, or divine punishment
People did not get medical care, used religious practices etc.
7. Know the distinction between psychosis and neurosis
Psychosis: A severe mental disorder characterized by a break with reality
Individual may not know where they are at a given place in time
Individual may experience delusional thinking
These include manifestations of biological problems
Neurosis: A milder mental disorder characterized by distortions of reality
Consists of psychological disorders
Your sense of reality is still intact
More in the psychological realm not biological
8. What did Kreaplin view as the origin/cause of mental illness? What were the
guiding principles behind Kreaplin’s classification system? What did he
ultimately conclude with respect to this approach and why?
Caused by biological and genetic factors
Wanted to move beyond symptom approach
Instead use anatomical pathology and etiology
Ultimately concluded it’s nearly impossible
9. What was the history around the development of the DSM? Be able to discuss the
major discrepancies between the DSM-I/II and later editions of the DSM (starting
with DSM-III) including the influence of the neo-Kraepelinians
Four separate classification systems were around in the US, which American psychiatrists found embarrassing
Classification was inconsistent
10. Who were the neo-Kraepelinians and what did they stand for?
The neo-Kraepelinians were a group of psychiatrists in the late 20th century who sought to revive and modernize the work of Emil Kraepelin, a German psychiatrist known for his emphasis on empirical observation, classification, and biological explanations of mental illness
Wanted to reaffirm mental illness as under the purview of psychiatry and reaffirm
psychiatry as a new branch of medicine
11. What were the main critiques of the DSM?
Conception of mental illness
Co-occurrence of different diagnoses
Not therapeutically useful
Lengthy consultation process
12. What is aversive conditioning and how does it factor into anxiety?
Aversive conditioning terms:
US: unconditioned stimulus
Ex: hot pan
UR: unconditioned response (reflexive)
Ex: pulling your hand away if hot oil splashes on it
CS: conditioned stimulus
Ex: sound of food sizzling in pan
CR: conditioned response
Ex: jumping at the sound of food sizzling even if you don’t get splashed with hot oil
This process is classical conditioning for aversive (unpleasant) stimuli
What differentiates anxiety from an anxiety disorder?
Anxiety: A normal, adaptive response to stress/danger
Anxiety Disorder: Chronic, excessive, irrational anxiety
Usually without cause
Interferes with daily life
13. What are the two-factors of Mowrer’s two-factor theory of anxiety? What are
some of the problems that two-factor theory has in accounting for specific
phobias?
Two factor theory (classical + operant conditioning = learned associations and maintenance of behavior)
Factor 1 - Classical Conditioning
Ex: you pet dog and it bites you. You now learn that dogs bite. So the next time you see a dog, it will elicit a fear response
Factor 2 - Operant Conditioning
Ex: a dog bit you and you learned to fear them. Now, you avoid being in situations where dogs are present to maintain a sense of safety. This acts as a positive reinforcer for the avoidance behavior
a. Be able to identify the different pathways to fear acquisition
15. What is the difference between lumping and splitting with respect to anxiety
disorders? What is the rationale for lumping all anxiety disorders into one? What
would be lost in terms of information about specific disorders if this was done?
What is it that ultimately creates different topographies across the anxiety
disorders?
Lumping: Combining similar disorders into broader categories based on shared characteristics
Splitting: Separating disorders into distinct categories based on their unique features
Rationale: All anxiety disorders share key features (excessive fear, worry, physical arousal, avoidance behaviors)
What would be lost:
Differences in treatment response
Different triggers and fears
Comorbidity
Different anxiety disorders have different behavioral patterns, physiological response, neurobiological differences
16. What is the preparedness account of phobias and in what ways does it address
problems with two-factor theory accounts? How can two-factor theory also
account for these problems?
Often offered as an additional theory of fear acquisition with an evolutionary advance, makes a lot of evolutionary assumptions (whereas two-factor theory does not)
Preparedness Theory: Individuals are predisposed to fear certain things over others due to evolutionary pressures
17. What characteristics of the first panic attack may predispose individuals to future
attacks? What is meant by panic disorder being a “fear of fear”?
If you had panic attack in a place where there’s:
Impaired functioning (e.g., driving)
Entrapment (e.g., air travel)
Negative social evaluation (e.g., Mr. Holt thought it would be bad to explain to everyone what’s going on)
If you had one in the past where you distant from home, and you’re distant from home it’s a cue for anxiety
18. What aspects of an initial panic attack are associated with the development of
agoraphobia?
Agoraphobia: Conceptualized as a fear of being in places in which escape might be difficult/help unavailable incase of a panic attack; or symptom development that might be
incapacitating or embarrassing
“I’m afraid I’m gonna have panic in a place I don’t want to have panic”
19. What is the key feature of GAD (not just the label, be sure to understand the
phenomenon and its function)?
THE INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCES CHRONIC AND UNCONTROLLABLE WORRY THAT IS EXCESSIVE (IN RESPONSE TO A MINOR EVENT) AND UNREALISTIC (UNFOUNDED CONCERNS
Has 3 primary functions
Problem-solving
Motivation
Emotional Processing
20. Know the information linking temperament and attachment style to Social
Anxiety Disorder
Infants with an inhibited temperament more frequently develop into children and adolescents who avoid novel or unfamiliar people, objects, and situations
Leads to insecure attachment and avoidant behavior
Diagnostic Criteria for each Disorder
GAD
EXCESSIVE ANXIETY AND WORRY (APPREHENSIVE EXPECTATION),
OCCURRING MORE DAYS THAN NOT FOR AT LEAST 6 MONTHS, ABOUT A
NUMBER OF EVENTS OR ACTIVITIES (SUCH AS WORK OR SCHOOL PERFORMANCE)
INDIVIDUAL FINDS IT DIFFICULT TO CONTROL THE WORRY
ASSOCIATED WITH THREE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING SIX SYMPTOMS (Only 1 symptom needs to be present for children)
RESTLESSNESS, OR FEELING KEYED UP OR ON EDGE
BEING EASILY FATIGUED
DIFFICULTY CONCENTRATING OR MIND GOING BLANK
IRRITABILITY
MUSCLE TENSION
SLEEP DISTURBANCE
Panic Disorder
RECURRENT AND UNEXPECTED (“OUT OF THE BLUE”) PANIC ATTACKS*
AT LEAST ONE OF THE ATTACKS HAS BEEN FOLLOWED BY 1 MONTH (OR MORE) OF 1 (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING:
PERSISTENT CONCERN ABOUT HAVING ADDITIONAL ATTACKS
WORRY ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE ATTACK OR ITS CONSEQUENCES (E.G., LOSING CONTROL, “GOING CRAZY”)
A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR RELATED TO THE ATTACKS
SETTING FOR INITIAL PANIC ATTACK CRITICAL
LIKELY RESULT OF IMPAIRED FUNCTIONING (E.G., DRIVING)
ENTRAPMENT (E.G., AIR TRAVEL)
NEGATIVE SOCIAL EVALUATION (E.G., IN THE THEATRE, RESTAURANT, ETC.)
DISTANCE FROM SAFETY (E.G., UNFAMILIAR LOCALES)
BARLOW’S (1998) “ALARM THEORY”
IF THE PANIC ATTACK IS A TRUE ALARM, THEN THE RECURRENCE OF PANIC ATTACKS IS LESS LIKELY
IF THE PERSON CANNOT IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT THAT INDUCED PANIC (A FALSE ALARM), THE RECURRENCE OF A PANIC ATTACK BECOMES MORE LIKELY
SAD
Median age is 13 years, onset occurring between 8 and 15 for 75% of cases
A marked fear or anxiety about one or more social or performance situations in which the person is exposed to possible scrutiny by others (e.g., social
interactions, performing)
Individual fears acting in embarrassing or humiliating ways (e.g., showing symptoms of anxiety)
Exposure to feared social situation almost invariably provokes anxiety
Feared social or performance situations are avoided or endured with intense anxiety or distress
The fear or anxiety is out of proportion to the actual threat posed by the social situation and to the sociocultural context
Fear causes significant distress or impairment in the person’s normal routine, occupation, social activities/relationships, or there is marked distress about phobia
Fear, anxiety, or avoidance is persistent (typically lasting for 6 months or more).
Phobias
MARKED AND OUT OF PROPORTION FEAR WITHIN AN ENVIRONMENTAL OR SITUATIONAL CONTEXT TO THE PRESENCE OR ANTICIPATION OF A SPECIFIC OBJECT OR SITUATION
EXPOSURE TO THE PHOBIC STIMULUS PROVOKES AN IMMEDIATE ANXIETY RESPONSE, WHICH MAY TAKE THE FORM OF A SITUATIONALLY BOUND OR SITUATIONALLY PREDISPOSED PANIC ATTACK
THE PERSON RECOGNIZES THAT THE FEAR IS OUT OF PROPORTION
THE PHOBIC SITUATION(S) IS AVOIDED OR ELSE IS ENDURED WITH INTENSE ANXIETY OR DISTRESS
THE AVOIDANCE, ANXIOUS ANTICIPATION OR DISTRESS IN THE FEARED SITUATION(S) INTERFERES SIGNIFICANTLY WITH THE PERSON'S NORMAL ROUTINE, OCCUPATIONAL (OR ACADEMIC) FUNCTIONING, OR SOCIAL ACTIVITIES OR RELATIONSHIPS, OR THERE IS MARKED DISTRESS ABOUT HAVING THE PHOBIA
Review Session Questions
Anxiety Disorders:
Fear of negative evaluation and scrutiny by others are crucial parts of this diagnosis
Social Anxiety Disorder
When stimulus response pairings are learned slowly over time
Insidious Acquisition
Mowrer’s idea (if you can experience it, it can be conditioned and behaviors are maintained through reinforcement and punishment)
Two Factor Theory
Idea that all anxieties are developed by same processes
Lumping
People fear procedures that have bodily sensations similar to the ones experienced during panic attacks
Cognitive Feature
Defining Behavior Disorders:
The model that says behavior disorders are a choice
The Moral Model
Potential components of behavior disorder, none of them necessary
Subjective distress, abnormality, dysfunction
The difference between malfunction and dysfunction
In notes
History of Classification and Diagnosis
What is the ultimate goal of a classification system?
Utility
Conflict between different schools of psychiatry led to the DSM 3 being described as
Theoretically Agnostic
Researcher that sent assistants to psych wards to show
David Rosenhan
A function of classification, looking at or observing a phenomenon
Descriptive Pathology
Access to insurance coverage is an example of this purpose of classification
Sociopolitical
Conditioning and Learning:
Fear can develop without direct experience with the given stimulus
Vicarious Conditioning (modeling)
Parents told you fast food was poisonous, you never eat fast food
Instructional Transference
When bodily sensations become conditioned and elicit further arousal
Interoceptive Conditioning
An initially neutral stimulus that first has no associated response then becomes
Conditioned Stimulus
A stimulus that elicits a reflexive response
Unconditioned Stimulus
Other:
An individual who is pretending to have a disorder they don’t have
Malingering
Normal and natural differences in brain functioning from person to person
Neurodiversity
Disorder that changed the trajectory of psychiatry during the 1800s by providing empirical evidence against assumptions about mental illness (found syphilis in the brain)
Dementia Paralytica
Idea of defense mechanisms are associated with this psychiatrist
Freud
Biological impulses give rise to behavioral motivations and behavior disorders represent defense mechanisms
Kraeplinian