Discussion focused on state-led development in East Asia.
Importance of checking in and submitting assignments.
Recognition of the "burger of the day" submissions related to class topics.
Quizzes:
Quiz 3 is closed; Quiz 4 will be released after class.
No late submissions for quizzes; two lowest grades can be dropped.
Paper Due Dates:
Paper 1 assignment will be released after class, due on February 14th at 11:59 p.m.
Focused on differences in development and theories explaining why some countries develop while others do not.
Reviewed existing theories:
Cultural Theory
Geographic Theory
Institutional Theory (from Asimoglu and Robinson)
New theories introduced:
Modernization Theory (linear development and benefits like democratization)
Relative Backwardness Theory (unique development paths based on specific circumstances)
Dependency Theory (division between core and peripheral countries, hindering development in peripheral nations).
The term refers to high-performing economies in East Asia.
Key examples include:
Japan
South Korea
Taiwan
Singapore
Hong Kong
Notable economic growth especially in the 1980s and 1990s.
Pockets of development concentrated in Western Europe and North America.
The Asian Tigers exhibit unusual development trajectories compared to historical expectations.
Comparison of GDP growth rates shows Asian economies outperforming traditional developed regions like the OECD.
Interventionist State:
Strong government intervention in the economy.
Active roles in planning and incentivizing economic growth.
Autonomy:
Civil servants focused on economic goals rather than political affiliations.
Investment-Friendly:
Efforts to draw foreign and domestic investments.
Strategy to develop local industries by restricting imports of finished goods.
Aimed at building local capacity to produce domestic goods, especially automobiles.
Restrict Imports:
Stop foreign cars to give domestic industries breathing space.
Technology Transfer:
Import capital goods and technology to build a domestic manufacturing base.
Investment in R&D:
Focus on research and technological advancement.
Protectionism:
Use of tariffs to protect emerging industries until they are competitive.
Restrictions on final car imports led to the emergence of local brands like Kia and Hyundai.
Emphasis on internal production capabilities through technology and capital goods imports.
Tariffs serve as additional costs for importing goods, deterring foreign competition to nurture local industries.
Comparison of GDP from the 1960s ($1,250) to present high levels of development.
South Korea transformed from underdeveloped to advanced economy in approximately 70 years.
US Funding Post-Korean War:
Financial and technological assistance from the United States post-war.
Land Reform:
Redistribution of land to dismantle power of large landowners, enabling industrialization.
Government led by authoritarian figures to implement economic plans without resistance.
Investment in education and skilled labor to support industrial growth.
As domestic industries became competitive, the focus shifted to exporting goods rather than just protecting local markets.
Competition with foreign brands was essential for further growth.
Need to transition from a domestically protected market to one that competes globally.
Lessons from East Asia suggest that:
Development models need a combination of protectionism and export focus.
State intervention played a crucial role in creating competitive industries.
Authoritarian governance can sometimes facilitate rapid economic changes without public opposition.
Next lectures will explore Latin America's development and contrast the outcomes seen in East Asia.