lecture recording on 12 March 2025 at 14.34.55 PM

Overview

  • The lecture covers key information regarding the upcoming individual research project and group project for business law.

Exam Preparation

  • Test Day: Scheduled for Monday.

  • Materials Required: Scantron, pencil, index card for notes (front and back).

  • Discussion on Schedule Confusion: Students clarify their times and realize a change was made without everyone being aware.

Individual Research Project

  • Purpose: Each student must submit an individual project involving two case briefs followed by a compare and contrast.

  • Structure Requirements:

    • Two separate briefs addressing two listed cases.

    • A final compare and contrast section does not allow for AI use; failure to comply will result in an automatic failure.

    • Students are encouraged to discuss ideas and drafts with peers but must write their own work.

  • Project Timeline: Assigned early in the semester with a deadline far into the future, allowing ample time.

  • IRAC Method:

    • I - Issues: Legal questions central to the appeal.

    • R - Rules: Legal precedents and justifications that the court utilized. Must reference relevant case law.

    • A - Analysis: A narrative analyzing the application of the facts to the law encompassing all examined issues. This constitutes the majority of the grade.

    • C - Conclusion: Summarizes the court's decision; this section is straightforward and can be paraphrased.

  • Aim for Comprehensive Understanding: Students must understand legal reasoning, not just facts. Include relevant facts leading to the court's decisions in the analysis.

Finding Legal Cases

  • Resources for Research:

    • Students can access Westlaw through the university's library website.

    • Also mention alternatives such as Google, FineLaw.com, or Caselaw.com.

    • Notes on the importance of headnotes in Westlaw that outline significant issues concerning cases.

Specific Legal Cases

  • Cases to Brief:

    • Starzinski vs. Capital Public Radio

    • Kajabi vs. Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group

    • Each case needs an earlier appellate or supreme court reference, along with counsel for parties involved.

    • Emphasis on understanding the legal principles, issues, and comparative contractual applications.

Project Expectations

  • Workload:

    • Complete drafts of the briefs well in advance of the due date.

    • Encourage students not to cram; thorough preparation is key.

  • Drafting Order: Students should start with Starzinski, which is simpler, then proceed to Kajabi.

    • Full drafts are to be submitted separately but graded in context of each other.

Group Project

  • Collaboration: Groups must choose one case from Starzinski and complete a brief using the IRAC method.

  • Presentation: Prepare a presentation detailing the chosen case’s significance to Starzinski's decision rather than presenting all IRAC components.

  • Individual Contributions: Each group must submit a page detailing each member’s contributions to ensure accountability.

  • Final Thoughts: Importance of identifying key issues and rules efficiently, with multiple group members contributing in various capacities to avoid over-reliance on individual efforts.

robot