The lecture covers key information regarding the upcoming individual research project and group project for business law.
Test Day: Scheduled for Monday.
Materials Required: Scantron, pencil, index card for notes (front and back).
Discussion on Schedule Confusion: Students clarify their times and realize a change was made without everyone being aware.
Purpose: Each student must submit an individual project involving two case briefs followed by a compare and contrast.
Structure Requirements:
Two separate briefs addressing two listed cases.
A final compare and contrast section does not allow for AI use; failure to comply will result in an automatic failure.
Students are encouraged to discuss ideas and drafts with peers but must write their own work.
Project Timeline: Assigned early in the semester with a deadline far into the future, allowing ample time.
IRAC Method:
I - Issues: Legal questions central to the appeal.
R - Rules: Legal precedents and justifications that the court utilized. Must reference relevant case law.
A - Analysis: A narrative analyzing the application of the facts to the law encompassing all examined issues. This constitutes the majority of the grade.
C - Conclusion: Summarizes the court's decision; this section is straightforward and can be paraphrased.
Aim for Comprehensive Understanding: Students must understand legal reasoning, not just facts. Include relevant facts leading to the court's decisions in the analysis.
Resources for Research:
Students can access Westlaw through the university's library website.
Also mention alternatives such as Google, FineLaw.com, or Caselaw.com.
Notes on the importance of headnotes in Westlaw that outline significant issues concerning cases.
Cases to Brief:
Starzinski vs. Capital Public Radio
Kajabi vs. Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group
Each case needs an earlier appellate or supreme court reference, along with counsel for parties involved.
Emphasis on understanding the legal principles, issues, and comparative contractual applications.
Workload:
Complete drafts of the briefs well in advance of the due date.
Encourage students not to cram; thorough preparation is key.
Drafting Order: Students should start with Starzinski, which is simpler, then proceed to Kajabi.
Full drafts are to be submitted separately but graded in context of each other.
Collaboration: Groups must choose one case from Starzinski and complete a brief using the IRAC method.
Presentation: Prepare a presentation detailing the chosen case’s significance to Starzinski's decision rather than presenting all IRAC components.
Individual Contributions: Each group must submit a page detailing each member’s contributions to ensure accountability.
Final Thoughts: Importance of identifying key issues and rules efficiently, with multiple group members contributing in various capacities to avoid over-reliance on individual efforts.