Unit 3: Parties, Elections, & Interest Groups Notes
POLITICAL PARTIES
Definition
Group of ppl joined together (in the sake of government)
AKA Coalition
like minded individuals whose main goal is to make policy
“Factions”
5 functions **See handout**
Nominate candidates
Influence policy
Unite government
Create balance
Inform citizens
Can be thought of in 3 parts:
In the electorate (people — mostly those who can vote)
As an organization (working for the party)
In government (elected officials)
Why do we have a 2-Party System??
Historical basis
Electoral system
Force of tradition
Consensus—most ppl accept it
Membership
Broad based = minimal fee
Reasons for joining
Parents
Major events
Economic status
Age, residence, level of education
Party Platform
Mission statement
Set of beliefs
What values the party is founded on
2 Party System in American History
US has been 2 party system since the beginning
Dems vs. GOP (Grand Old Party . . . AKA Republicans)
Since the 1800s, the 2 parties have switched dominance
The New Era (1968-present) has become a “divided gov” which in turn creates gridlock
Functions/What Do They Do?
Pick candidates via a nomination
Run campaigns
Establish an image
Articulate policies
Compete for votes, connect citizens w gov
Coordinate policy making
Voters want certain issues addressed and adopted by gov —m things that benefiot them the most
Parties want to win by selecting policies that are widely favored
Nobody votes for loser, only for winners
Centrist policies win out
3rd/Minor Parties
4 types
Ideological:
Ideologies that are also parties
EX: Libertarian Party
Single Issue:
One single issue that is causing the rest of society’s problems
Fixing that will fix everything else
EX: Prohibition Party, The Rent is Too Damn High Party
Economic Protests:
Show up in recessions or depressions (tough economic times)
EX: TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party
Splinter:
Splintering off from one of the two main parties
EX: Bull Moose Party (Teddy Roosevelt)
Importance
Can play the role of a spoilers/skewers, also critics and innovators
EX: Ralph Nader stole Al Gore’’s thunder in 2000
Ross Perot hurt H.W. Bush in 1992
Can be a major factor in close elctions
Not a real threat
Only 8 have won any electoral votes
Some successes:
1996 and 1992: Ross Perot’s Reform Party
1968: George Wallace’s American Independent Party
1924: Robert LaFollettfe’s Progressive Party
1912: Teddy Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party
Jesse Ventura’s Revolution:
Brough left wing and right wing philosophies choice, prochoice and pro capital punishment
Brought out new voters, age 18-26
Manipulated the media to his advantage of free publicity
Other parties ran half hearted campaigns
Future of Parties
Many voters regard themselves as independents
Increasing split ticket voting
Candidates are less dependent on their party because of social media and technology
Free/cheaper publicity
Party Dealignment = people shifting away for both parties
Affects democrats more
ELECTION PROCESS
Getting Nominated
Self announcement
Frontloading = scheduling primaries and caucuses early in order to weed out the weak candidates
Caucus = group of like minded ppl who get together to pick a candidate (type of primary)
Bracket style selection of candidate
IOWA
Early January, kicks off primary season
Candidates must do well or money will dry up
Winners need to be ideologically extreme
Winners often regret statements in Iowa/NH (EX: Howard Dean)
10 southern states counter w/ super tuesday in march
Primaries = when parties pick a candidate to run in general election
Closed —> only party members can vote
Open —> any registered voter can participate
Most (like MI) have rules where you cannot vote for both parties
Blanket —>
Goal of winning primary is to get a certain # of delegates to send to national convention
Money & The Election Process
Campaign Finance
Golden rule of politics = “those who have the gold, rule”
FEC (federal election commission) established by law in 1974 to regulate campaign finances
Requires transparency in spending and fundraising
Government matches funds up to $75 mil
Limited individual contributions to $2,000 per candidate (no limit on total spending during an election cycle)
Buckley vs. Valeo supreme court case
Challenged FEC
Loopholes —> “soft money”
Indirect money for a candidate
Led to creation of 527 groups or PACs
527s are independent organizations that run ads that are not sponsored by a political party of candidate
Hard money = direct money to candidate
McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act (2002)
Banned soft money to parties from corporations
No money from people under 18
Banned issue advocacy ads by non PACs during the 30 days before primaries or 60 days before general elections
Individuals can now give $2,700/candidate/election
$95,000 maximum (for total candidates you give to)
Challenged in court; upheld in McConnell vs. FEC
See graphic organizer
Role and Reputation of Interest Groups
An organization of people with shared policy goals, entering policy process at several points to try to achieve these goals in many arenas
Congress
Congressional hearings
Lobbying congressional leaders
Judicial
Arguing before the supreme court
Executive
Working with executive agencies
Also at local, state, and federal levels
SIGS are policy specialists where as political parties are policy generalists
Theories of Interest Group Politics
Pluralist Theory
Elite Theory
Hyper-pluralist Theory
What Makes a Successful Interest Group?
Money
Access to politicians with cash distributed by PACs
Usually give money to incumbents
Someone in office who is re-running
Intensity
Single issue groups
EX: NRA, abortion
Size
Free-Rider Problem: some people don’t join interest groups because they benefit from the group’s activities without officially joining
Smaller are easier to organize and more focused on issue but get less money
Larger group are harder to keep organized and have more free-riders but get more dues, etc.
Good Leaders
Prominent leader helps the reputation of the group
Enhances their ability to attain goals
Political Action Committees (PACs)
Political ($) arms of SIGs which have a major stake in public policy
Used to be the only way for corps and unions to make large donations before CU vs. FEC
Most associated with economic interest…unions and corporations
$5,000 max to individual candidates
PROS
Help finance elections
Increase knowledge of members
Encourage voting and participation
Links public with it representatives
CONS
Pressure to make contributions
Too much influence on public officials
Funds go to incumbents
Over 60% are business related
Hyperpluralism
Super PACs
Don’t have to register w/ FEC
Don’t have to disclose how much money is being spent and where it comes from
Independent political committees that support a candidate w/ unlimited, often anonymous, donations from companies, unions, or individuals
Can’t contribute directly to a candidates, most ads are negative
People running PACs typically closely connected to the candidate the PAC supports
POLITICAL PARTIES
Definition
Group of ppl joined together (in the sake of government)
AKA Coalition
like minded individuals whose main goal is to make policy
“Factions”
5 functions **See handout**
Nominate candidates
Influence policy
Unite government
Create balance
Inform citizens
Can be thought of in 3 parts:
In the electorate (people — mostly those who can vote)
As an organization (working for the party)
In government (elected officials)
Why do we have a 2-Party System??
Historical basis
Electoral system
Force of tradition
Consensus—most ppl accept it
Membership
Broad based = minimal fee
Reasons for joining
Parents
Major events
Economic status
Age, residence, level of education
Party Platform
Mission statement
Set of beliefs
What values the party is founded on
2 Party System in American History
US has been 2 party system since the beginning
Dems vs. GOP (Grand Old Party . . . AKA Republicans)
Since the 1800s, the 2 parties have switched dominance
The New Era (1968-present) has become a “divided gov” which in turn creates gridlock
Functions/What Do They Do?
Pick candidates via a nomination
Run campaigns
Establish an image
Articulate policies
Compete for votes, connect citizens w gov
Coordinate policy making
Voters want certain issues addressed and adopted by gov —m things that benefiot them the most
Parties want to win by selecting policies that are widely favored
Nobody votes for loser, only for winners
Centrist policies win out
3rd/Minor Parties
4 types
Ideological:
Ideologies that are also parties
EX: Libertarian Party
Single Issue:
One single issue that is causing the rest of society’s problems
Fixing that will fix everything else
EX: Prohibition Party, The Rent is Too Damn High Party
Economic Protests:
Show up in recessions or depressions (tough economic times)
EX: TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party
Splinter:
Splintering off from one of the two main parties
EX: Bull Moose Party (Teddy Roosevelt)
Importance
Can play the role of a spoilers/skewers, also critics and innovators
EX: Ralph Nader stole Al Gore’’s thunder in 2000
Ross Perot hurt H.W. Bush in 1992
Can be a major factor in close elctions
Not a real threat
Only 8 have won any electoral votes
Some successes:
1996 and 1992: Ross Perot’s Reform Party
1968: George Wallace’s American Independent Party
1924: Robert LaFollettfe’s Progressive Party
1912: Teddy Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party
Jesse Ventura’s Revolution:
Brough left wing and right wing philosophies choice, prochoice and pro capital punishment
Brought out new voters, age 18-26
Manipulated the media to his advantage of free publicity
Other parties ran half hearted campaigns
Future of Parties
Many voters regard themselves as independents
Increasing split ticket voting
Candidates are less dependent on their party because of social media and technology
Free/cheaper publicity
Party Dealignment = people shifting away for both parties
Affects democrats more
ELECTION PROCESS
Getting Nominated
Self announcement
Frontloading = scheduling primaries and caucuses early in order to weed out the weak candidates
Caucus = group of like minded ppl who get together to pick a candidate (type of primary)
Bracket style selection of candidate
IOWA
Early January, kicks off primary season
Candidates must do well or money will dry up
Winners need to be ideologically extreme
Winners often regret statements in Iowa/NH (EX: Howard Dean)
10 southern states counter w/ super tuesday in march
Primaries = when parties pick a candidate to run in general election
Closed —> only party members can vote
Open —> any registered voter can participate
Most (like MI) have rules where you cannot vote for both parties
Blanket —>
Goal of winning primary is to get a certain # of delegates to send to national convention
Money & The Election Process
Campaign Finance
Golden rule of politics = “those who have the gold, rule”
FEC (federal election commission) established by law in 1974 to regulate campaign finances
Requires transparency in spending and fundraising
Government matches funds up to $75 mil
Limited individual contributions to $2,000 per candidate (no limit on total spending during an election cycle)
Buckley vs. Valeo supreme court case
Challenged FEC
Loopholes —> “soft money”
Indirect money for a candidate
Led to creation of 527 groups or PACs
527s are independent organizations that run ads that are not sponsored by a political party of candidate
Hard money = direct money to candidate
McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act (2002)
Banned soft money to parties from corporations
No money from people under 18
Banned issue advocacy ads by non PACs during the 30 days before primaries or 60 days before general elections
Individuals can now give $2,700/candidate/election
$95,000 maximum (for total candidates you give to)
Challenged in court; upheld in McConnell vs. FEC
See graphic organizer
Role and Reputation of Interest Groups
An organization of people with shared policy goals, entering policy process at several points to try to achieve these goals in many arenas
Congress
Congressional hearings
Lobbying congressional leaders
Judicial
Arguing before the supreme court
Executive
Working with executive agencies
Also at local, state, and federal levels
SIGS are policy specialists where as political parties are policy generalists
Theories of Interest Group Politics
Pluralist Theory
Elite Theory
Hyper-pluralist Theory
What Makes a Successful Interest Group?
Money
Access to politicians with cash distributed by PACs
Usually give money to incumbents
Someone in office who is re-running
Intensity
Single issue groups
EX: NRA, abortion
Size
Free-Rider Problem: some people don’t join interest groups because they benefit from the group’s activities without officially joining
Smaller are easier to organize and more focused on issue but get less money
Larger group are harder to keep organized and have more free-riders but get more dues, etc.
Good Leaders
Prominent leader helps the reputation of the group
Enhances their ability to attain goals
Political Action Committees (PACs)
Political ($) arms of SIGs which have a major stake in public policy
Used to be the only way for corps and unions to make large donations before CU vs. FEC
Most associated with economic interest…unions and corporations
$5,000 max to individual candidates
PROS
Help finance elections
Increase knowledge of members
Encourage voting and participation
Links public with it representatives
CONS
Pressure to make contributions
Too much influence on public officials
Funds go to incumbents
Over 60% are business related
Hyperpluralism
Super PACs
Don’t have to register w/ FEC
Don’t have to disclose how much money is being spent and where it comes from
Independent political committees that support a candidate w/ unlimited, often anonymous, donations from companies, unions, or individuals
Can’t contribute directly to a candidates, most ads are negative
People running PACs typically closely connected to the candidate the PAC supports