33d ago

Chapter 8 - st 2

Chapter 8: Helping

Prologue: The Nature of Helping Behavior

  • Prosocial Behavior: Actions like caring, giving, volunteering, and donating that benefit individuals and society.

  • Social Responsibility Norm: A cultural belief that encourages assistance to those in need.

Why We Help

  • Goals of Helping:

    • Genetics: Helping behaviors are adaptive and ensure the propagation of one's genes.

    • Egoism: Assistance is provided for personal gains, classified into three types:

      1. Mood-based: Helping improves one’s mood.

      2. Material-based: Help leads to material rewards.

      3. Status-based: Recognition and respect are gained through helping.

    • Altruism: Helping others selflessly, aiming to benefit them without seeking personal gain.

Origins of Helping Behavior

  • Kin Selection: Preference for aiding genetic relatives which enhances the survival of similar genes.

  • Inclusive Fitness: Focuses on the survival of one's genes through direct offspring and relatives.

  • Group Selection: Helping behavior may evolve to support group survival.

  • Reciprocity: Engaging in mutual assistance creates a cycle of help.

    • Norm of Reciprocity: Encourages reciprocal help and discourages harming those who assist.

    • Direct Reciprocity: Expectation that help will be returned.

    • Indirect Reciprocity: Providing help without expecting anything in return, fostering a culture of support.

Individual Experiences

  • Development of Helping in Children: Evidence shows children as young as 18 months can display helping behaviors.

  • Operant Conditioning: Rewards increase the likelihood of future helping.

  • Social Learning: Observing and modeling prosocial behavior from others.

  • Prosocial Video Games: Some games are designed to encourage prosocial behavior in players.

When Do We Help?

  • Time Pressure: Can negatively impact the likelihood of helping (e.g., Good Samaritan Study).

  • Location: Rural areas see more helping behaviors compared to urban areas; length of community residence correlates with helping.

How Mood Affects Helping

  • Mood Management Hypothesis: Individuals help to elevate their mood, especially when feeling sad.

  • Negative State Relief Model: Observing someone in distress evokes sadness in the observer, motivating them to help.

  • Arousal: Cost-Reward Model: The intensity of the victim's distress influences the helper's response. Factors include:

    • Greater arousal leads to increased likelihood of helping.

    • Closer relationship between bystander and victim enhances motivation.

    • Bigger potential rewards compared to costs also increases helping behavior.

Helping in Emergencies

  • Kitty Genovese Case (1964): Highlights bystander apathy where witnesses failed to assist, often due to perceived apathy.

Characteristics of Emergencies

  • Emergencies are typically characterized by:

    • Actual or potential harm.

    • Rarity and unexpectedness.

    • Immediate action required for resolution.

The Empathy-Altruism Relationship

  • Empathic Concern: Emotion related to the welfare of others in need; fundamentally linked to altruistic behavior.

  • Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis: Asserts that feeling empathy leads to altruistic motivations for helping.

    • Antecedents: Recognizing the need for help and valuing the well-being of others.

Neuroscience of Empathy

  • Studies (Jackson et al., 2006) highlight brain activity differences when imagining personal versus others' suffering.

    • Temporo-parietal Junction (TPJ): Engaged when considering others’ pain, not one's own.

    • Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC): Activated during both self and other conditions.

Personal Factors Affecting Helping

  • Heroic Altruism: Traits such as empathy and a strong moral obligation encourage heroic acts amidst serious risk.

  • Prosociality: A person's disposition towards engaging in helping behaviors.

    • Prosocialness Scale: Considers traits like agreeableness and accepting others as equals.

Gender & Helping: Who Helps More?

  • Helping can be either:

    • Individually-oriented (typically men): More action in risky situations.

    • Collectively-oriented (typically women): Generally more relational and communal in helping approaches.

Who Gets Helped?

  • Gender Dynamics: Women tend to receive more help compared to men.

  • Victim Attractiveness: More attractive individuals receive more assistance.

  • Similarity: A higher degree of similarity between helper and person in need increases the likelihood of help.

  • Personal Responsibility: Perceptions of personal responsibility can decrease helping, influenced by the Just-World Hypothesis.

Shared Identity and Helping

  • Shared Identity Effect: Belonging to the same social group fosters helping behaviors and interventions.

Helping Across Cultures

  • Individualism vs. Collectivism: Collectivist societies typically show more helping behaviors.

  • Cultural Embeddedness: Focus on family and ingroup versus individualism affects helping dynamics; helping for strangers is less common in collectivist cultures.

Final Thoughts: A Broader View of Helping

  • Perspectives on human nature include both selfish and cooperative behaviors.

  • Morality plays a key role in encouraging helping, though humans delineate actions determined by various influencing factors.


knowt logo

Chapter 8 - st 2

Chapter 8: Helping

Prologue: The Nature of Helping Behavior

  • Prosocial Behavior: Actions like caring, giving, volunteering, and donating that benefit individuals and society.

  • Social Responsibility Norm: A cultural belief that encourages assistance to those in need.

Why We Help

  • Goals of Helping:

    • Genetics: Helping behaviors are adaptive and ensure the propagation of one's genes.

    • Egoism: Assistance is provided for personal gains, classified into three types:

      1. Mood-based: Helping improves one’s mood.

      2. Material-based: Help leads to material rewards.

      3. Status-based: Recognition and respect are gained through helping.

    • Altruism: Helping others selflessly, aiming to benefit them without seeking personal gain.

Origins of Helping Behavior

  • Kin Selection: Preference for aiding genetic relatives which enhances the survival of similar genes.

  • Inclusive Fitness: Focuses on the survival of one's genes through direct offspring and relatives.

  • Group Selection: Helping behavior may evolve to support group survival.

  • Reciprocity: Engaging in mutual assistance creates a cycle of help.

    • Norm of Reciprocity: Encourages reciprocal help and discourages harming those who assist.

    • Direct Reciprocity: Expectation that help will be returned.

    • Indirect Reciprocity: Providing help without expecting anything in return, fostering a culture of support.

Individual Experiences

  • Development of Helping in Children: Evidence shows children as young as 18 months can display helping behaviors.

  • Operant Conditioning: Rewards increase the likelihood of future helping.

  • Social Learning: Observing and modeling prosocial behavior from others.

  • Prosocial Video Games: Some games are designed to encourage prosocial behavior in players.

When Do We Help?

  • Time Pressure: Can negatively impact the likelihood of helping (e.g., Good Samaritan Study).

  • Location: Rural areas see more helping behaviors compared to urban areas; length of community residence correlates with helping.

How Mood Affects Helping

  • Mood Management Hypothesis: Individuals help to elevate their mood, especially when feeling sad.

  • Negative State Relief Model: Observing someone in distress evokes sadness in the observer, motivating them to help.

  • Arousal: Cost-Reward Model: The intensity of the victim's distress influences the helper's response. Factors include:

    • Greater arousal leads to increased likelihood of helping.

    • Closer relationship between bystander and victim enhances motivation.

    • Bigger potential rewards compared to costs also increases helping behavior.

Helping in Emergencies

  • Kitty Genovese Case (1964): Highlights bystander apathy where witnesses failed to assist, often due to perceived apathy.

Characteristics of Emergencies

  • Emergencies are typically characterized by:

    • Actual or potential harm.

    • Rarity and unexpectedness.

    • Immediate action required for resolution.

The Empathy-Altruism Relationship

  • Empathic Concern: Emotion related to the welfare of others in need; fundamentally linked to altruistic behavior.

  • Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis: Asserts that feeling empathy leads to altruistic motivations for helping.

    • Antecedents: Recognizing the need for help and valuing the well-being of others.

Neuroscience of Empathy

  • Studies (Jackson et al., 2006) highlight brain activity differences when imagining personal versus others' suffering.

    • Temporo-parietal Junction (TPJ): Engaged when considering others’ pain, not one's own.

    • Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC): Activated during both self and other conditions.

Personal Factors Affecting Helping

  • Heroic Altruism: Traits such as empathy and a strong moral obligation encourage heroic acts amidst serious risk.

  • Prosociality: A person's disposition towards engaging in helping behaviors.

    • Prosocialness Scale: Considers traits like agreeableness and accepting others as equals.

Gender & Helping: Who Helps More?

  • Helping can be either:

    • Individually-oriented (typically men): More action in risky situations.

    • Collectively-oriented (typically women): Generally more relational and communal in helping approaches.

Who Gets Helped?

  • Gender Dynamics: Women tend to receive more help compared to men.

  • Victim Attractiveness: More attractive individuals receive more assistance.

  • Similarity: A higher degree of similarity between helper and person in need increases the likelihood of help.

  • Personal Responsibility: Perceptions of personal responsibility can decrease helping, influenced by the Just-World Hypothesis.

Shared Identity and Helping

  • Shared Identity Effect: Belonging to the same social group fosters helping behaviors and interventions.

Helping Across Cultures

  • Individualism vs. Collectivism: Collectivist societies typically show more helping behaviors.

  • Cultural Embeddedness: Focus on family and ingroup versus individualism affects helping dynamics; helping for strangers is less common in collectivist cultures.

Final Thoughts: A Broader View of Helping

  • Perspectives on human nature include both selfish and cooperative behaviors.

  • Morality plays a key role in encouraging helping, though humans delineate actions determined by various influencing factors.