Attendance only on guest speaker days and zoom sessions
Midterm - 30 multiple choice and true and false questions in the classroom, review session on the 24th
Gender in sociology
Is understood as a set of ideas that are socially constructed
Social differences ascribed to biological sex (more diverse than primarily binary social script)
Learned through social interaction
Would there be gender without social interaction
About power and social order
Intimately connected to politics
Ideas about what gender is are contested
Often doesn't translate well and reflects ideas formulated in English
Regularly used as a stand in for biological sex, and binary terms and thinking are still prevalent even though gender is not considered to be based on “essential” nature
If we learn gender via dominant social scripts, why do some of us not follow them?
The idea that gender is socially constructed can be seen as undermining certain right claims
Talking about gender as
A function of socialization and/or as identity (not necessarily mutually exclusive)
As identity, as a continuum
Assuming that any discussion of masculinity or femininity are also references to socially created categories - these are gender related ideas
Sociology of gender
Definition : the critical analysis of gendered meanings that are otherwise assumed to be natural or neutral
New, not everywhere
Brought into academia from activism, social movement first
Both the object of study and the analyst are gendered
A site of perpetual contestation - the development of the field is marked by its capacity to look at its own history critically
Inter-disciplinary
Why theorize gender
Gender is complex and imbued with power but still regularly assumed to be simple and natural. This hides all kinds of oppression, limitations, and possibilities
Many people impose ideas about gender unthinkingly and this continues to do damage
There is no real possible separation between theory and practice, there is no not theorizing option - there is only not being aware of, or accountable for, unspoken theory at work
Practice without theory can be
Nihilistic : reflection is a luxury
Relativist : why focus on the concepts and ideas too much when there are many ways of thinking about this issue
Alway Work
Sociology questions “naturalized” explanations - including evolutionary and essentialist
Questioning what gender is, the social norms that create gender etc
According to sociologists, social existence - existence among other humans - does a lot of the work to make us what we are
Sociology also aims to address social problems
Sociology excludes feminist and queer theories
Alway tries to unpack the lack of engagement of feminist theory
Studying gender challenges binaries
Gender theory challenges the dichotomous categories (sociology and other sciences have tended to use)
Binaries make us think in a hierarchy, dominance terms
Bell hooks also makes this argument, alway draws on her
Embedded at the core of western thought works
It pokes holes in the “sociological / social science canon”
The insights of gender theory point to the ways that many sociologists and other social scientists have ignored or not fully understood a significant part of history and social phenomena
Studying gender means seeing silences and gaps everywhere in our established knowledge
Challenges the training and expertises of the foundational works
Gender throy tends to critique the “founding fathers” of sociology - Marx, Weber and Durkheim
It displaces sociology’s original focus
Sociology has traditionally focused on trying to explain different pathways and outcomes of “modernization” or “development”
Gender norms as the key issue
Thinks that it puts gender theorist outside of its disciplin
Displaces sociology’s founding problematic (focus)
Challenging classical texts
Marx : critique of capitalism and theory that change is/will be driven by workers (without consideration of gendered unpaid labour)
Built onto by feminist economist
Charles Tilly : modernization is about states waging war (mainly actions of men)
Barrington Moore : democratization depends on aspects of class struggle between aristocrats, the bourgeoisie, and peasants (but “democratization” means that aristocratic men who own land can participate in gov)
Immanuel Wallerstein : modernization was achieved through colonial oppression/globalized exploitation (but no analysis of how this is gendered)
Gender theory blurs the boundaries of the discipline
Sociologists and other social scientists are often skeptical of inter-disciplinary studies or forms of “mixing”
They are often puritanical in the sense of attempting to keep the discipline “pure”
Gender theory (esp queer theory) is generally open to ideas of fluidity, blurred or mixed categories
Feminist, gender, and queer theory/studies often seek to work across disciplines (critiquing the academy’s traditional boundaries that are often about self-justification)
It has (at times) taken an anti-academy position
Causing hostility to gender theory
Marginality, to some extent, has been a strategy of gender theorists
Part of the “ethos” of gendre studies is to remain with regular people and grounded in the world
It has sometimes had an anti-ivory tower perspective
Sometimes this is how clarity and critique forms - from seeing from “outside” and not being co-opted into the inner circle or a dominant position
It is politically committed
The “classical” idea of “objectivity” argues that you cannot be politically committed and be a good “scientist” to produce reliable knowledge, you have to be disinterested or dispassionate
Sandra harding has called this the view from nowhere
They dont really have a social position
Feminist and gender theroist argue this type of objectivity is both not necessary and not possible
What has gender theory offered to sociology
Feminist scholarship has reduced reliance on and acceptance of male experiences and perspectives, added to existing knowledge about social institutions and processes, introduced new topics and concepts, redirected inquiry about previously overlooked areas of social life ,and helped forge and maintain interdisciplinary linkages within the field of sociology
The effort to theorize more adequately the interrelationships between levels and categories of social reality (there is no micro vs macro analysis, public vs private realm)
A conceptual shift from either/or to both/and thinking
E.g the personal is political (you cant divide politics from the personal realm)
E.g the oppressor and the oppressed are not necessarily different people / groups (most people dont fit neatly into one category)
E.g bifurcated consciousness vs false or true consciousness ( a marxist concept) (false consciousness is when workers accept the oppression their under as they are lead to believe this is a normal situation, marxist feminist critqiues this as it doesnt afford alot of agency, the privileged theorists can always say when u agree with me u have a liberated consciousness and when u dont agree with me u have a false consciousness, abuse on the side of the theorists, alot of things can happen inside a person at the same time women can use to their advantage even if it is labelled false consciousness)
Changing treatment of power, resistance, and oppression
Power is reconceptualized as personal, inter-personal, omni-present, as is resistance
This expands our analysis of power from a unique focus on dominance
Introduce new ideas of how power works
Not struck between objectivism and relativism
Reliable or valuable knowledge is understood as not only produced through disinterested or dispassionate approaches and people but also not infinitely relative or particularist (where it becomes impossible to really know anything about the world)
Standpoint theory
Standpoint theory is the idea that all science is embedded in a particular time and place and influenced by politics
Standpoint theorists assert that the motivation of the researcher cannot define the quality or objectivity of the research, and that reliable science can be produced by those who have distinct political projects and personal motivations or pursuing the research.
All knowledge is situated knowledge (alway)
All knowledge is politically committed knowledge (alway)
Stereotyped way of looking at knowledge
Value neutrality, diversity, and strong objectivity
Strong objectivity : diversity (applied to various aspects of the research or knowledge development process) can help us “maximize objectivity” - holding objectivity to a higher standard - without references to a “value-free” ideal
Diversity (in this usage) means we recognize we cannot see things neutrally and can only mitigate this problem by seeking a range of views, influences, collaborators, critics etc
Act Up
Activist movement during the AIDS crisis for medication
Many activists died during their fight
Forced phramcula companies and gov to change
A journey within the study of gender
Gender theorists are shifting into a less categorical perspective (away from “women”)
Queer Theory
Challenges the perceived coherence of sex, gender and sexuality
Chalelnges the nature of the categories as singular and fixed - people may identify in different ways over time and multiple ways at once, ror not really embrace any of the labels we have so far
Challenges the modernist idea that we all have “coherent” selves
Engages with ideas of power that relate toz “self-dicipline” or “self policing” based on norms
In this article, sociological thoery refers to the range of abstract general approaches and competing and complementary schools of thought that exist in the discipline of sociology
Social theories develop out of a need to explain and understand something in our social experience
Postmodernist social theory has developed as changes in the cultural, political, social, and economic bases of the modern world have called into question the adequacy, assumptions, and implications of long-dominant explanations
Feminist theory developed as changes in women’s situations and experiesaaances gave rise to a political movement that challenged prevailing explanations of women’s subordinate position in the social world
Seeks to describe and explain women’s experiences and situations in ways that inform efforts to end their subordination
Women centered
Offers explanations about how the social world is structured and critiques of how that world has been studied and understood
The impact of feminism on sociology has been far smaller than expected
Texts on sociological theory often make no mention of feminism or feminist theory
The generalizations of mainstream and feminist social theorist often have failed to account for, an indeed have excluded the experiences of many women
Feminism exposes sociology
The feminist theory has its origins and base in political movement - that is defined by an overriding political commitment - further taints its scholarly and scientific standing
Political identity makes it convenient for sociologists to deal with its primarily as a social movement and therefore to treat feminist theory as simply the ideology of a social movement
Gender upsets a vert basic opposition (of nature and culture) which has informed the discipline’s self understanding.
Requires reassessment of basic sociological categories and distinctions
Displaces the founding and defining, problematic of the discipline
The problematic of modernity and the problematic of gender postmodernist, feminist, and sociological theory
Postmodernist theory introduces a new set of social actors and is not clearly aligned with a social movement of the interests of a particular group
Not as easily subsumed, neutralized or dismissed
More often viewed as the viewpoint of the time
Sociology developed as a response to social and intellectual concerns aroused by the economic and political revolutions that created modern capitalist society
In its origins and its development - in its central concerns, categories, concepts and methods - sociology has sought to identify the nature, dynamics, problems, limits and possibilities of modernity
Feminist theorist focus on the sig of gender, on the range of gender roles and gender symbolis found in social life, and on how they either maintain social order or promote social change
Direct practical and theoretical attention to the changing, varied and intersecting forms and functions of hierarchy, oppression, difference and invisibility in all dimensions of the social world
The problematic of gender leads away from an exclusive focus on women to a more general concern with structures and practices of social inequality and social life
The discursive center of sociological and postmodernist theory is modernity; the discursive center of feminist theory is gender
On common issues / for critical encounters
Four issues
The effort to theroize more adequately the interrelationships between levels of social reality
The treatment of power, resistance, and oppression
Work on effecting a conceptual shift from either/or to both/and thinking
The effort to establish grounds for assessing knowledge claims that avoid the pitfalls of both objectivism and relativism
Defining power in terms of the ability of one person or group to prevail over others through various means focuses sociological attention on the actions of dominants
To posit the social as irreducibly heterogeneous is to render this project infeastible. Thus both feminism and sociology face the chalenge of recognizing and respecting individual subjects and differences among subjects and groups, while also developing generalizations that provide a basis for social analysis and critique
The article uses the insights of queer theory to push the monographs in an even “queerer” theoretical directions which involves taking more seriously the nonnormative alignments of sex, gender, and sexuality
Four monogrpahs are evaluated in light of the main tenets of queer theory as they have been developed in the past decade
Leila Rupp and Verta Taylor's (2003) Drag Queens at the 801 Caba ret,
Steven Seidman's (2002) Beyond the Closet: The Transformation of Gay and Lesbian Life,
Julie Bettie's (2003) Women without Class: Girls, Race, and Identity,
Mimi Schippers's (2000) Rockin 'out of the Box: Gender Maneuvering in Alter native Hard Rock
Examples of utilizing key components of a queer perspective in empirical research
Serve as templates for future queer work in the area of gender and sexuality
This experience does not invalidate the constructed nature of these categories. It simply attests to the ideological power of categorical thinking and the modernist assumptions of coherent selves
A queer analysis challenge this understanding of sexual identity by focusing on the historical constructed and contingent nature of the homosexual/heterosexual binary and the many ways in which individual desires, practices, and affiliations cannot be accurately defined by the sex of object choice
Most socioogist understand sexual and gender identities as products of the interaction between structure and agency
The gay liberation movement did not eliminate the category homosexual or make sex of object choice an irrelevant or unmarked social characteristic; it reversed the discourse by changing the meaning of the category from sick and deviant to healthy and normal
Juidth bulter - identiies are the effect of the repeated performance of certain cultural signs and conventions
Gendering sexuality : drag queens at the 801 cabaret
Drage queens perform cultural critique by highlighting the performativity of sexual and gender identities and the constructed natuer of the normative alignments between anatomical sex, gender roles and sexual identity
Sex and gender are seen as inseparable
Leading up to the second wave of the feminist movement, theorist and philosophers began to distinguish gender from sex
Second wave feminism
The gendered public / private divide : the idea that many aspects of women’s lives are (or should be seen as) more private than men’s lives
Paid work and domestic responsibilities
Reproductive rights
Men are allowed to just be the standard human, allowed to valislate and neutrality, women are only particular
Men are never just the other as they are allowed an neutral space
Can we think of consciousness without competition / battle
Women are defined by the negative
Humanity is male
Otherness is a fundamental category of human thought
Precursor to second wave feminism
De Beauvoir used to always be pictured and theorized in the context of her relationship with Jean-Paul Sartre. They were a couple and were coupled as theorists.
in Second Wave feminism, de Beauvoir gained salience in her own right. Her most famous idea is that “women are not born, they are made.”
She asserts that men are both particular and neutral or standard, while women are seen as only particular or different.
De Beauvoir believed that women often participated in making themselves into an ‘object’, or self-objectifying.
This meant conceptualizing oneself as existing to be seen and to be defined by the way men see you, rather than existing to do the seeing and participating in defining what you see.
Critized for not acknowledge the risks of breaking outside social norms (talks about her privileged life like its available to everyone)
saw women who were primarily in heterosexual couples, primarily living in nuclear families, and primarily not working in paid employment.
saw that women as a group were divided up among men and structurally dependent on them.
believed this resulted in more challenging solidarity structures and mobilization potential.
by the time her memoire comes out in 1958, this seems to be changing
Class privilege
Compared relationship between men and women to slave and slavemaster
Until the 18th century, people in western societies thought there was only one sex (and that women’s genitalia were the inverse of men’s).
From the 18th – 20th centuries, people embraced the ideology of extreme difference between two binary sexes.
(As Maria Mies argues, this coincided with industrialization, the deepening of the gendered division of labour, and the onset of intensive capitalism).
Actual human bodies (and their diversity) have not changed.
Lorber suggests that continuing to produce knowledge, do research, or make public policy based on socially imagined categories is misleading.
She suggests we look for empirical patterns in different types of behaviour and experience and then see if those patterns map onto gender and sex categories (rather than starting with gender and sex categories and looking for similarities within categories and differences between them).
Lorber argues for a ‘no fixed sex or gender categories’ approach to research and the production of knowledge.
Biology is ideology
Western ideology takes biology as the cause, and behaviour and social statuses as the effects, and then proceeds to construct biological dichotomies to justify the "naturalness" of gendered behavior and gendered social statues
Patriarchy as a system of social leadership, decision-making, and organization
Origins of patrarichy : women as farmers
The advent of settled agriculture (an invention attributed to women) was a key moment in the development of a division of labour (earlier hunter-gatherer societies were more gender equal).
Women were more likely to be agriculturalists and gatherers, due to having an earlier responsibility to provide food for others
Pastoralism
men tended to look after cattle and they needed weapons to protect their herds.
Learning to make and use weapons made men more powerful.
They then targeted women (who tended to be agriculturalists and gatherers) because they had more fixed assets to steal and less ability to evade attack.
The persecution and burning of the midwives as witches was directly connected to the emergence of modern society; the professionalization of medicine, the rise of medicine as a “natural science”, the rise of science and of modern economy
The persecution of the witches was a manifestation of the rising modern society and not as is usually believed a remnant of the irrational dark middle ages
Responsible for abortion, infertility and sexual intercourse without conception
The witch trials provided employment and money for a host of lawyers, advocates, judges, councils
Critic of marx, marxist feminist
Monopoly of arms
She then links the modernization process and the drive toward capital accumulation to the further gender division of labour
Mies sees capitalism as continuing a pre-existing patriarchal pattern – pre-capitalist relations were also patriarchay
Tries to come up with origins for patriarchy
Mens tasks are seen as truly human (more imp), women dont have to put any work in, there is no labour its what women naturally do
Invention of housewife and breadwinner relationship is late in history
Naturalized every aspect of raising a child that we think it happens on autopliot
Super exploitation
People like marx and angles talk about the exploitation of workers (underpaid, pushed to work long hours so someone else can make money off of it)
This exploitation on non wage labourers which then wage labour exploitation is then possible
Context of rubin’s essay
Expansion of sexual/erotic communities during turn of the century urbanization processes and during the world wars
1950s post war backlash
1960s-1970s second wave feminism and the sexual revolution
1960s-1990s cold war politics linked to “purging” LGBTQ personnel from civil services in western countries
1980s - a period of reaction to second wave feminism and the sexual revolution of the 1960s and 70s
Characterized by a kind of sex panic that created a host of new laws and perspectives
Concerned about the direction of feminist theory
Aruges that certain tools / beliefs are used to justify the oppression of some sexualities (sexual essentialism)
LGBTQ purges
LGBTQ gov personnel were cast as social and political subversives and seen as targets for blackmail by communist regimes seeking classified information
Characterizations were justified by arguments that people who engaged in sam-sex relations suffered from a character weakness and had something to hide because of their sexuality
The RCMP investigated large numbers of people. Many of them were fired, demoted or forced to resign - even if they had no access to security info
PM Trudeau apologized in 2017
Canadian gov settled a class action suit for 145 million CAD in 2018
Sexuality has a history
Foucault : sexualities have been shaped by
An increased interest in studying, talking about and analyzing sex
Distinct sexualities have been shaped by different social interests (and reactions to them) over time
Rubin : cont sexual persecution against emergent identity groups has its roots in the industrialization process - people migrated to cities and formed communities in ways that were previously impossible
Sexuality as a system of power
Sex negativity : generalized sense of suspicion towards sex/sexuality
The fallacy of misplaced scale : the underlying idea that sexual “immorality” is a kind of sin worse than others
The hierarchical valuation of sex acts
Heterosexual sex between married people is at the top of a pyramid of sexual practices, which ranks sexuality on a scale of acceptability
Elsewhere, rubin calls rewarded sexualities “the charmed circle of sexuality”
The domino thoery of sexual peril
Part of the slippery slop logical fallacy the idea that there is a line between order and chaos and we are forever in danger of falling into chaos
Complexity and nuance are afforded to favoured sexualities
The lack of a concept of benign sexual variation
Sexuality variation is assumed to be dangerous, leaving us without a functional framework for assessing actual harm (or lack thereof)
A critique of rubin’s “benign sexual variation”
Rubin fails to thoroughly conceptualize key aspects of two central concepts
The power within the sexual power system lacks a robust theorizing of interpersonal power dynamics
Through the word consent is used, it is not defined or discussed carefully
The power in the system of power she has conceptualized in quite institutional
For her, power is coming from those who make the rules (the state, religious standards, social norms upheld by the socially powerful)
She is not consistently clear about what it means for sexual ariation to be actually be benign
She never provides a direct definition or a framework for determining what sexual practices can be considered harmless
Sometimes laws are designed to provide a blanket protection for those who are most vulnerable to harm, partly because the concept of consent (or the lack of it) is so difficult to evidence/prove/conceptualize
Consequences of analytical gaps
To be clear, extensive information exists about the harms of sexual abuse of a child by an adult
Statuory rape laws exist today due to patterns of documented harm experienced by minors
History of sex being viewed as deviant (masturbation as a sin, dangerous, prostitution etc) and laws against it especially in the US
Sexual essentialism - the idea that sex is a natural force that exists prior to social life and shapes institutions
Micheal foucault’s the history of sexuality
Sex negativity - western cultures view sex to be a dangerous desrtuctive negative force
Moral panic - the political moment of sex in which diffuse attitudes are channeled into political action and from there into social change
Link between porn and crime and sexual deviance - male privilege
Most sex law does not distinguish between consensual and coercive behaviour
In law consent is a privilege enjoyed only by those who engage in the highest status sexual behvaiour
Meant to be a critique of heterosexual assumptions within feminism
Should not be surpised at the inclusion of trans women
Bio. men have one innate orientation a sexual one that draws them to women where women are sexual towards men and reproductive towards children
Compulsory heterosexuality
Feminist separatism - women choosing to separate from ostensibly male-defined, male-dominated institutions, relationships, roles and activities
Motherhood as sa political institution
Characteristics of male power
To deny women ones own sexuality or to force male sexuality upon them
To command or exploit their labour to control their produce
To control or rob them of their children
To confine them physically and prevent their movement
To use them as objects in male transactions
To cramp their creativeness
To withhold from them large areas of the society’s knowledge and cultural attainments
Porn creates a climate in which sex and violence are interchangeable and widens the range of behaviour considered acceptable from men in heterosexual intercourse
Lesbian existence (both the fact of the historical presence of lesbians and our continuning creation of the meaning of that existence ) and lesbian continuum (a range through each woman’s life and through history of woman-identified experience)
Two case studies that examine how nontransgender people, gender normals, interact with transgender pepole to highlight the connections between doing gender and heteronormativity
By contrasting public and private interactions that changed from nonsexual to sexualized to sexual show how gender and sexuality are tied together
The criteria for membership in a gender category are significantly different in social versus (hetero) sexual circumstances
While gender is presumed to reflect biological sex in all social interactions, the importance of doing gender in a way that represents the shape of one’s genitals is heightened in sexual and sexualized situations
Responses to perceived failures to fulfill gender criteria in sexual and sexualized relationships are themselves gendered
Theorizing heterosexuality did not become central to feminist sociology rather queer theory
Transgender people disrupt cultural expectations that gender identity is an immutable derivation of biology
In social situations, transgender people have cultural genitalia that derive from their gender presentation
The relationship between heterosexuality and gender oppression remains undertheorized in social science research
Researches how “gender normals” refect to transgender people
Doing gender in a way that does not reflect biological sex can be perceived as a threat to heterosexuality
Cisgender men and women attempt to repair these potential ruptures through the deployment of normatively gendered tactics that reify gender and sexual difference, these simultaneously negate the authenticity of trans people gender and sexual identitiyies and reaffirm heteronormative assumptions
Transmen as seen as on eo fthe guys at the workplace - connection between doing gender and maintaining heteronormativity
Adrienne Rich - Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence
questions how heterosexuality has come to be understood as being the most common sexuality (as people believe it is
Never questioned
Terms get used as if they arent problematic
Why species survival, impregnation, emotional/erotic relationships have become so ridgid
heterosexuality is not just an incidental sexual orientation
Arguement about women
Needs to be studied as a political institution
Heterosexuality is an institution that has to be actively maintained.
It is constantly reinforced as ‘compulsory’, especially for women.
Section II: Rich argues that heterosexuality is an institution maintained by a variety of forces. She believes that these forces wrench women’s erotic and emotional energies from themselves and other women towards men and heterosexuality
Like simone debeauvoir theory about becoming a woman
If its so natural why do we work so hard to keep it in place
An institution that has to be maintained
The options for social acceptability and stability/safety are presented in terms of heterosexual romantic love, partnership, and nuclear, hetero-normative family
Non-coupled women, women in relationships with other women, or women non-dependent on men have often been mocked or more overtly socially sanctioned.
Lesbian, single, communal, etc. lives are made invisible, or appear unlikely, unrealistic, or fraught with difficulty (more than for heterosexual couples)
A wide range of forms of violence also maintain men’s sexual access to women and access to women’s labour
Compulsory heterosexuality is also achieved through a process of male-identification for girls/women:
Male perspectives are far more common in popular art
Male perspectives have informed our conceptualizations of family, state support, harm and fault/culpability, etc. in law and society
Women come to prioritize the opinions, perspectives, authorities, pleasures, companionship, etc. of men over other women and themselve
Lesbian existence: the historical and contemporary presence of lesbian life, against the grain of hetero-normativity.
Lesbian continuum: includes women’s experiences, not only sexual attraction between women but also other types of bonding: sharing of a rich inner life; giving and receiving support; marriage resistance, etc.
All heterosexual sex is rape
Heteronormativity and hetrosexuality is innately oppressive
Previously in soci. Gender was defined as
A set of traits that emanate naturally from biological sex
The outward expression of an interior self (noting that the interior self may not map onto social expectations associated with biological sex)
Roles that people are taught (socialized) into playing (much like the role of ‘student’) – a package of expectations (usually taught early in life), that people conform to (or not)
External, structural, and institutional regulation (e.g., through law, etc.
Structuralist theory
Risman and Davis
As sociologist began to specialize in gender, the focus on how individuals internalize gender was problematized. There were two very different theoretical alternatives developed within a sociological framework to move the analysis of gender beyond a focus on individuals : those who worked in an interactionist tradition, a framework which came to be known as doing gender and those who were based in more inequality literatures, the new structuralists
Doing gender
Draws on sociology Irving Goffman
When humans interact with each other, we assume that each person has an ‘essential nature’, which we look for to understand and ‘stabilize’ the interaction
To signal to each other and organize the interaction or make it intelligible, we engage in ‘displays’
Displays as highly conventionalized behaviors structured as two-part exchanges
Gender displays (or signals of masculinity and femininity) are some of the most common and foundational organizing signals that people provide to make an interaction legible
West and Zimmerman
‘Doing Gender’ refers to the interactional process of crafting gender identities that are then presumed to reflect and naturally derive from biology.
They argue that gender is a set of doings, but importantly, that this is about interaction with other
works because of a three-part sex/gender system: sex, sex category, and gender
Sex category: the regular, everyday mental classifications that people make based on assumptions about bodies
We are always doing gender, it is unavoidable
Habitus
Sociological term that refers to people’s embodied traits and behaviours
We act in a certain way because of our lived experiences and not solely by the force of external social structures
We speak, think and act how we do not because of clear rules or punishments but because we slowly developed cultural competency through socialization
E.g accents, beliefs, manners, temperament
Gender performance and drag
Ambiguities in performers in drag balls - some are mocking or having fun with gender, many embody these standards aspirationally
So, while drag performances do challenge normative gender expectations in some ways, this is not necessarily because the performance intends to be critical of normative gender
Some of the ways that ‘doing gender’ queers original meanings and creates more social space for less rigid performance may be via ‘failing’ to perfectly replicate. (Butler believes this is true far beyond the drag ball
All gender is performative
Critique of west and zimmerman
largely confined within the gender binary, neglecting how non-binary (persons who identify with neither male nor female identities) or gender fluid (persons who fluctuate between gender categories or express multiple at once) individuals actively construct their gender identity on a daily basis.
West and Zimmerman do not appear to imagine a world in which people might wish to conform to a non-binary gender
Barbee and shrock (2019) “un/gendering social selves”
investigates a process they term “un/gendering social selves,” meaning how non-binary people define and present themselves in their daily lives to avoid binary classification from others.
participants described manipulating their appearance to neutralize any gender signifiers that could be read on their bodies. For example, participants discussed consciously choosing their clothing, accessories, or makeup so that their appearance does not solely fit into one gender category
By identifying how individuals “un/gender” embodiment and discourse, Barbee and Schrock show that individuals still actively construct their gender even when those individuals do not conform to binary gender categories. Like West and Zimmerman originally theorized about men and women, non-binary individuals also “do gender” even in their efforts to neutralize their gender identity
Meaning for social change
Social movements like feminism can provide new ideologies and ideas to help question the forces of external regulation
New social ideas can cause socializing processes to become more flexible and less ideologically normative about gender
Individuals can reflect on how they ‘do gender’ and challenge expectations
These changes can make ‘doing gender’ less rigidly ‘accountabl
Aims to advance a new understanding of gender as a routine accomplishment embedded in everyday interaction
Critical assessment of existing perspectives on sex and gender and the introduction of important distinctions among sex, sex category and gender
Recognition of the analytical independence of these concepts is essential for understanding the interactional work involved in being a gendered person in society
Drag, cross dressing and transsexualism place women at the object of hatred and appropriation, nothing in the identification that is respectful or elevating
Places drag as misogyny, makes male homosexuality about women
Drag is nothing but the displacement and appropriation of women and thus is based in a misogyny
Paris is burning about african american and latino men who perfomed in drag balls in harlem in the 80s
Feminists are depicted as promoting agendas that are not important to a majority of indigenous communities
Esp. those who are fighting for self-determiniation and sovereignty
Dominant genealogies and etymologies of feminism are a colonial entrapment that helps to sustain mainstream feminist ideologies, feminist colonial practices, white supremacy, and colonial patriarchy
Suffragists’ adamant claims to white superiority and indigenous savagery laid the groundwork for their individual advancement as white women into settler regimes of power
The heteropatriarchical state is the violent actor
Early moments of feminism controlled gender and sexuality
Critiques
The rhetoric of a nostalgic past that evades the real work and responsibilities it took and takes to maintain healthy communities
The rhetoric of tradition that is used to exclude or discipline bodies
The construction of culture as stagnant and not accounting for continued growth since time immemoiral
The belief of state permanence
Legitimacy and ongoing sustainability of capitalism in its current forms
The rheotic of sovereignty that puts aside rights of some of its citizens and expects compliance even against ones own interests
Many black female intellectuals have made creative use of their marginality (outsider within status) to produce Black feminist thought that reflects a special standpoint on self, family, and society
Characteristics
Black women’s self-definition and self valuation
The interlocking nature of oppression
The importance of Afro-American women’s culture
Suggests that black women might draw upon these key themes as outsiders within to generate a distinctive standpoint on existing sociological paradigms and that other sociologists would also benefit by placing greater trust in the creative potential of their own personal and cultural biographies
Inside relationship - black women as domestic workers to white families
affluent white people writing about thier “black mothers”
Stress the sense of self-affirmation they experienced at seeing white power demystified - advantages of racism
Knew they would never belong, remained as outsiders
Outsider within
Special standpoint on self, family and society for Afro-American Women
Black women’s ideas have been honed at the juncture between movements for racial and sexual equality and contends that afro-american women have been pused by “their marginalization in both arenas” to create black feminism (E. Frances White)
Benefits of the outsider within status
Simmel’s definition of “objectivity” as a “peculiar composition of nearness and remoteness, concern and indifference”
The tendency for people to confide in a stranger in ways they never would with each other
The ability of the stranger to see patterns that may be more difficult for those immersed in the situation to see
Mannheim labels the strangers in academia as marginal intellectuals, arguest that the critical poster may be essential to the creative development of academic disciplines themselves
Key themes in Black feminist thought
Definition suggests that its impossible to separate the structure and thematic contents of thought from the historical and material conditions shaping the lives of its producers - black feminist thought produced by black women recorded by others
Definition assumes that black women posses a unqiue standpoint on, or perspective of, their experiences and that there will be certain commonalities of perception shared by black women as a group
Black women may produce certain commonalities of outlook, the diversity of class, region, age and sexual orientation shaping individuals black women’s lives has resulted in different expressions of these common themes
Standpoint exists yet might not be clear to black women
The meaning of self definition and self valuation
Self definition involves challenging the political knowledge-validation process that has resulted in externally-defined, stereotpucal images of afro-american womanhood
Self valuation stresses the contents of Black women’s self definitions - namely, replacing externally-derived images with atuehtntic black female images
The insistence on Black female self-definition reframes the entire dialogue from one of determining the technical accuracy of an image, to one stressing the power dynamics underlying the very process of definition itself
Question what has been said, the credibility and intentions of who possesses the power to define
The theme of Black female self-valutation addresses the actual content of these self-definitions
Deining and valuing one’s consciousness of one’s own self-defined standpoint in the face of images that foster a self-definition as the objectified “other” is an important way of resisting the dehumanization essential to systems of domination
Other than the assumed norm of white male behvaiour (negative other) - virtual antithesis of positive white male images
Their value in allowing afro-american women to reject internalized, psychological oppression
The interlocking nature of oppression
Black feminist have possessed an ideological commitmnet to addressing interlocking oppression yet have been excluded from arenas that would have allowed them to do so
This viewpoint shifts the entire focus of investigation from one aimed at explicating elements of race or gender or class oppression to one whose goal is to determine what links are among these systems
Either or thinking
Shows an alternative humanist vision of societal organization
The importsnace of afro-american women’s culture
Uncovered previously unexplored areas of the Black female experience and identified concrete areas of social relations where Afro-American women create and pass on self-definition and self-valuations essential to coping with the simultaneity of oppression they experience
Connection between
Choices available to Black mothers resulting from their placement in historically specific political economies
Black mothers perceptions of their children’s choice are compared to what mothers thought those choices should be
Actual strategies employed by black mothers both inraising their children and in dealing with institutions that affected their children’s lives
The focus on black womens culture is significant as
Relationship between oppressed people’s consciousness of oppression and the action they take in dealing with oppressive structures may be far more complex than the suggested by existing social theory
Problematic nature of existing conceptualizations of the term activism
An analystical model exploring the relationship between oppression, consciousness, and activism is implicit in the way Black feminists have studied Black women’s culture
Researchers stress the interdependent relationship between the interlocking oppression that has shaped Black women’s choices and Black women’s actions in the context of those choices
Researchers rarely describe Black women’s behaviour without attention to the opportunity structures shaping their subject’s lives
Black women’s consciousness becomes a critical part of the relationship between the working of oppression and Black women’s actions
Dialectical relationship
The sociological significance of Black feminist thought
The content of Black women’s ideas has been influenced by and contributes to on-going dialogues in a variety of sociological specialities
The process by which these specific ideas were produced by this specific group of individuals
Two elements of sociological paradigms
Consists of the thought itself and its producers and practitioners
Sociology as a paradigm
Systems of knowledge are never complete
Important fact/theory relationship
Group insiders have similar worldviews
Process of becoming an insider
Black women and the outsider within status
To become sociological insiders, black women must assimilate a standpoint that is quite different than their own
Black women would have to accept certain fundamental and self-devaluing assumptions
White males are more worthy of study because they are more fully human than everyone else
Dichotomous oppositional thinking is natural and normal
Would have to act in accordance with their place in a white male worldview
Two types of anomalies
Black female sociologists typically report the omission of facts or observations about afro-american women in the sociological paradigms they encounter
Afro-american women in academia are frequently struck by the differences between their own experiences and sociological descriptions of the same phenomena
Emerged in the 1960s and 1970s in response to both second wave feminism and the civil rights and black power movements
But with roots in earlier anti-slavery and labour movements
Held close connections to lesbian feminism
Retained close, but at times contentious, relationships with other movements
Other feminists
Civil rights leaders
Anti colonial freedom struggles
Outsider within : connection to standpoint theory
Standpoint theory is the idea that all science is embedded in a particular time and place and influenced by politics
Partitica hill holdings
Hill collins
Benefits
Simmel's definition of "objectivity" as "a peculiar composition of nearness and remoteness, concern and indifference"
the tendency for people to confide in a "stranger" in ways they never would with each other;
the ability of the "stranger" to see patterns that may be more difficult for those immersed in the situation to see.”
Representing the role of an outsider
Value neutrality, diversity and strong objectivity
Strong Objectivity: Diversity (applied to various aspects of the research or knowledge development process) can help us ‘maximize objectivity’ – holding objectivity to a higher standard – without reference to a ‘value-free’ ideal.
Diversity (in this usage) means we recognize we cannot see things neutrally and can only mitigate this problem by seeking a range of views, influences, collaborators, critics, et
Self definition and self valuation
Against and aiming to counter “controlling images”
The interlocking nautre of oppression
Aware of/rooted in theorizing and thinking through the ways that different forms of oppression interact
The importance of black women’s culture
Focused thematically on studying, defining and understanding the influence of black women’s culture
Too focused on (white) middle class issues
Many black women did not relate easily to the second wave feminist focus on the problems of middle class suburban life
They critiqued this vision for being classist, heteronormative and generated by white solipism
Assumed greatest struggle was enforced domesticity
Second wave feminism created a vision of women who were all full time housewives and stay at home mothers
Often assumed that the greatest need of women was to break out of the private and enter the public
Resistance against compulsory housewife-ization was not central to black women’s feminist agenda
Saw traditional family as largely oppressive
White feminists often saw home/traditional family as oppressive, and something to be escaped
Black feminists tended to
Have a less nuclear vision of family in the first place
See black family and kinship relations as under threat from a state that was bent on criminalizing its members and breaking it apart. Family was to be fought for, not solely against
Did not properly address pay gap and working conditions
Due to assumptions about women as largely unpaid (non-breadwinners) and financially dependent on mne, second wave feminism did not initially focus on working conditions
A singular focus on bringing women out of the private sphere missed the point about the oppressive nature of the underpaid/exploited work many Black women experienced
Focused on legal solutions - viewed the state as a largely positive force
For white women, having the state take a more active role in protecting them inside their homes and in family law was a key solution (e.g addressing domestic violence and child custody issues)
Many black women experienced the state as largely predatory and wanted less state surveillance and monitoring of their families
For example, they feared the strengthened domestic violence laws and more assertive policing of family spaces could be another excuse to over police black men
Combahee river collective
Black feminist lesbian organization that was active between 1974 and 1980.
Created as there was a sense that both the feminist movement and the civil rights movement didnt reflect the particular needs of black women and lesbians
The collective joined together to develop the collective statement, which was a key document in developing contemporary black feminism
The main argument is that black lesbian women have been forced to choose movements that then often erased them - the civil rights movement wsa often male-oriented and heteronormative, while the feminist movement was driven by straight, white women and centered their perspective
Statement is well known as it carefully articulated this problem
Black feminist contribution to feminism
Criticism made the movement stronger
Working toward an anti-racist mass feminism
Links to indigenous feminism
Argue that the way we talk about feminism is euro-centric and tends to de-center work done by non-white people
Organzied around a “politics of refusal” including
Refusing rights via citizenship/state protection
Refusing invasive research and surveillance via academic study
Resfusing “controlling images” of pathology
Intersectionality
The interconnected nature of social categorization such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, understood as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of privilege, discrimination or disadvanage
Emerged as a critic of white solipsism and heteronormativity in feminism and male domiance in racial equality movement
The development of intersectionality theory
Patricia Hill Collins (1990), Angela Davis (1981), the women of the Combahee River Collective (1977) (origin of some of the core ideas) , Audre Lorde (1984), and Kimberlé Crenshaw (1991) all theorized how race, gender, class, and sexuality shape social experiences.
Hill Collins (1990) and Crenshaw (1989, 1991), in particular, theorized how these dimensions worked together.
Hill Collins outlined what she called a ‘matrix of domination’ (1990, 18) and spoke of ‘interlocking institutions’ (277), while Crenshaw developed theory using the term ‘intersectionality’ (1991, 149)
KIMBERLÉ CRENSHAW
interacting axes of identity might co-produce new oppressions that are more than the sum of their parts, and
part of this oppression is rooted in the illegibility of this position to others and therefore the inability of systems to recognize or address these forms of harm
Patricia Hill Collins
Matrix of Domination
Structural domian of power
Social institutions that produce the laws and policies we live under
organizes oppression in society. Collins argues that the organization of interlocking, large-scale social institutions reproduce the subordination of Black women
Hegemonic domain of power
Ideology and culture which produce the narratives that shape how we view people
refers to the system of ideas developed by a dominant group that justifies their practices. Through ideology, culture, and consciousness, the beliefs of the dominant group get normalized as common sense ideas that support their position
Disciplinary Domain of power
Bureaucratic organizations and authority figures that enforce the laws and policies
manages oppression. The organizational practices of social institutions manage power relations and control certain subpopulation
Interpresonal domain of power
Individuals who decide how to act with others in everyday social interaction
routinized daily practices of interaction at the microlevel of social organization, through which individuals uphold the subordination of othe
Patricia Hill Collins
Since its development, gender theorists working in this tradition have most commonly begun with the concept of intersectionality more or less as proposed by Crenshaw
Alternative conceptualizations are often simply understood as less popular synonyms
However, Hill Collins’ concept of the matrix of domination is notably different from Crenshaw’s intersectionality
Intersectionality focuses on how oppressions work together to produce specific injustices, while the concept of the matrix domination
Benefits of intersectionality
Four analytic benefits of intersectionality as a research / analysis paradigm
Simultaneity
Complexity
Irreducibility
Inclusivity
Critiques of Intersectionality theory
Used to take a snapshot rather than a history
Early visual metaphors of a matrix, a traffic junction, or a nexus may have enabled static usages, since these metaphors do not conjure notions of history or change
The popularizing of intersectionality theory within legal studies may also have contributed to a practice of reading “scenarios” or “cases rather than histories
Consequently, intersectionality theory is often applied to a snapshot rather than tracing an emergence over time in a specific context - can result in a “thin” or misleading analysis
The attraction and risk of simple metaphors
Intersectionality’s popularity may rest on its accessible but at times over-simplified metaphors.
This at times appears to make it ‘too portable’, and ironically, perhaps not as good at dealing with complexity as some have claimed
The Pitfalls of Popularity
The use of intersectionality has crowded out other useful concepts in gender theory, including those that produce powerful historical analyses (for example, patriarchy
The tendency to prioritize an acis of difference / produce a reference category
While often not doing so explicitly, the laundry list of axes of difference imagined by intersectionality theory often leads to intersectionality theorists prioritizing a category to be the focus of analysis, while simultaneously relying on an (often unspoken) reference category.
The reference or ‘unmarked’ category is left unanalyzed, in effect using intersectionality to explain how nondominant groups are ‘different’ from ‘normal’.
This practice reproduces the problematic understanding of the dominant group as the normative standard.
The Pitfalls of Portability
his is becoming increasingly salient as people lead more transnational lives, in which both within-country and between-country structures shape a person’s social positioning. They may have majority status and significant privilege in one context and minority status and far less privilege in another(60 – 1).
The tendency for intersectionality to be used to analyze a set of ‘diversity categories’ based on imported metaphors can result in scholars applying a framework that is effectively pre-populated with content on how difference works, and which axes of difference most significantly structure oppression
Harder in practice than in theory
Potential to reify categories
Tendency to assume the internal stability of the categories being used (key differences are between categories, not within, and categories stay the same).
Can become a way of ‘reifying’ categories – making them appear more solid than they are.
Drift away from a focus on how power works
Intersectionality theory tends to produce analyses that document what oppression looks like.
While Hill Collins originally incorporated four domains (or mechanisms) of power into her matrix of domination, this is not the version of intersectionality theory that has been widely embraced.
While some theorists argue that intersectionality theory remains inextricably linked to analysis of power, in practice it is often more focused on analyzing the hybridization of categories of identity
Re-claiming intersectionality
Some of the tools to address these problems exist within intersectionality theory:
Hill Collins developed a power-attentive matrix of domination.
She also made strong claims about the situatedness of her theories in the lives and histories of Black American women (Hill Collins 1990).
It may be that if intersectionality theory were consistently re-embedded in its origins as a power-conscious framework derived from deep attention to situated knowledge, it could yet address at least some of these issue
Intersectionalist has become the predominant way of conceptualizing the relation between system of oppression which construct our multiple identities and our social locations in hierarchies of power and priviledge
Aims to clarify the origins of intersectionality as a metaphor, and its theorization as a provisional concept in Kimberle Williams Crenshaw’s work followed by its uptake and mainstreaming as a paradigm by feminist theorists in a period marked by its widespread and rather unquestioned - if, at times, superficial and inattentive - usage
Four analytic benefits of intersectionality as a research paradigm : simultaneity, complexity, irreducibility and inclusivity
Common feminist theory to claim that oppression is not a singular process or a binary political relation, but multiple, converging, or interwoven systems - cant be captured through an analysis of gender alone
Intersectionality theory has been celebrated as the most important contribution that women’s studies has made so far
Origins in black feminist thought, by lesbian women of colour
Anti discirminatory laws for black women only relate to things that are also affected by black men or white women
Crenshaw - monistic definition of discrimination (excluse cat of sex and race) render the simultaenous experience of gendered racism invisible and legal claims of “compound” discrimination inadmissible
Legal concepts of discrimination must be revised
Discrimination must be reconceptualized in terms of the concrete experiences of black women
Hill collins
Intersectionality can be used to study micro, meso and macro level social phenomena
Individuals and groups maintain connections across countries so that social lives are constructed in transnational spaces
Transnational spaces are composed of tangible geographic spaces that exist across multiple nation-states and virtual spaces
Three difficulties of defining masculinity
No description without a standpoint
To list what men and women do requires that people be already sorted into the categories of men and women
To define masculinity as what men empirically are is to rule out the usage in what we call some women masculine and some men feminine
Masculinity is always liable to internal contradiction and historical disruption
Three hold model of the structure of gender distinguishing relations of
Power relations
Production relations
Gender divisions of labour (the economic consequences)
Cathexis (emotional attachment)
Emotional energy being attacked to an object (freudian terms)
The practices that shape and realize desire are thus an aspect of the gender order
Hegemony
Antonio gramsci’s analysis of class relations
Refers to the cultural dynamic by which a group claims and sustains a leading position in social lie
Masculinity : can be defined as the configuration of gender practice which embodies the currently accepted answer to the problem of the legitimacy of patriarchy, which guaratees/is taken to guarantee the dominant position of men and the subordination of women
Relates to cultural dominance in the society as a whole
In the 1980s research on men shifted from studying the male sex role and masculinity as a singular trait to studying how men enact diverse masculinities
Examines men’s behaviour as gendered beings in many contexts, from intimate relationships to the workplace to global politics
As kids children are called baby when they are being immature and boy/girl when being rewarded affirming gender and approval from others with doing gender properly
Transmen of colour are less likely to be respected and more likel to face harassment
Hybrid masculinity - men’s selective incorporation of performances and identity elements associated with marginalized and subordinated masculinities and feminities
Three distinct consequences associated with recent changes in performances and politics of masculinitiy that works to obscure the tenacity of gendered inequality
Symbolically distance men from hegemonic masculinity
Situate the masculinities available to young, white, heterosexual men as somehow less meaningful than the masculinities associated with various marginalized and subordinate others
Fortify existing social and symbolic boundaries in ways that often work to conceal systems of power and inequality in historically new ways
Hybrid masculinity as a way to look at the contemporary changes
Hybrid masculinity have at least three distinct consequences that shape, reflect and mask inequalities
May place discursive (not meaningful) distance between certain groups of men and hegemonic masculinity
Fortify social and symbolic boundaries and inequalities
The emergence of hybrid masculinities indicate that normative constraints are shifting but that these shifts have largely taken place in ways that have sustained existing ideologies and systems of power and inequality
Weather and how they are perpetuating and or challenging systems of gender and sexual inequality
Some are skeptical of whether hybrid masculinities represent anything beyond local variation
Others argue that hybrid masculinities are both culturally pervasive and indicate that inequality is lessening and possibly no longer structures men’s identities and relationships
The majority of the research and theory supports the notion that hybrid masculinities are widespread but signs of increasing levels of gender and sexual equality - hybrid masculine forms illustrate the flexibility of systems of inequality - represent significant changes in the expression of systems of power and inequality through fall short of challenging them
Inclusive masculinities
Anderson 2009
Contemporary transformations in men’s behaviours and beliefs are widespread and are best understood as challenging systems of gender and sexual inequality
Homohysteria is decrsing
Concerns three issues
Popular awareness of gay identity
Cultural disapproval of homosexuality
The cultural association of masculinity with heterosexuality
Dialectical pragmatism
Theorize the consequences of the changes Messner described
The ability of hegemonic masculinities to appropriate elements of subordinate and marginalized others in ways that work to recuperate existing systems of power and inequality
Kindergarten commando
A masculinity foreground muscle, toughness and the threat of violence followed with situationally appropraite symbolic displays of compassion
The masculinities tradition theorizes gender as an independent structure of domination; consequently, feminities that complement hegemonic masculinities are treated as passively compliant in the reproduction of gender
Patricia Hill Collins views cultural ideals of hegemonic femininity as simultaneously raced, classed and gendered
Women striving to approximate hegemonic cultural ideals of femininity as actively complicit in reproducing a matrix of domination
Hegemonic feminities reference a powerful location in the matrix from which some women draw considerable individual benefits while shoring up collective benefits along dimensions of advantage
In the process, they engage in intersectional domination of other women and even some men
Our analysis re-enforces the utility of analyzing femininities and masculinities from within an intersectional feminist framework
Becky / Miss Ann - white woman priviledge personified
Masculinities tradition (Connell) – sees femininity as passive and complementary to masculinity.
Intersectional feminism (Collins) – argues that femininities are actively complicit in reinforcing racial, class, and gender inequalities.
Proposes the concept of hegemonic femininities, which allow privileged women to gain benefits while sustaining oppression of marginalized women (and some men).
The “femininity premium” describes the individual advantages women can obtain by performing hegemonic femininities.
Women in hegemonic positions also participate in intersectional domination, reinforcing racial, class, and sexual hierarchies.
Contrasts gender order (Connell) with matrix of domination (Collins), arguing the latter provides a better framework for understanding power.
Masculinities Theory (Connell)
Gender relations are structured around male dominance.
Introduced the concept of “emphasized femininity”, which:
Is passive, subordinate, and compliant.
Exists to complement and sustain hegemonic masculinity.
Fails to account for women’s active role in sustaining other forms of oppression.
Intersectional Feminism (Collins)
Gender, race, class, and sexuality are interlocking systems of oppression.
Hegemonic femininities reinforce multiple axes of domination simultaneously.
Collins argues hegemonic femininity is:
Actively complicit in social inequality.
Tied to racial, class, and sexual privilege (e.g., white, affluent, heterosexual women benefit the most).
A key mechanism for reinforcing power structures.
Hegemonic Femininity vs. Emphasized Femininity
Feature Emphasized Femininity (Connell) Hegemonic Femininity (Collins)
Agency Passive, compliant Active, complicit
Role in Domination Supports masculinity indirectly Directly enforces oppression across race, class, and gender
Intersectionality Ignores race/class differences Recognizes racialized/classed femininities
Power Exists only in relation to men Grants women power over other women and marginalized men
Hegemonic femininity allows privileged women to benefit from gendered expectations while reinforcing racial and class inequalities.
Hegemonic Femininity and Social Power
Some women perform hegemonic femininities to gain power.
This benefits them individually but oppresses other groups.
The “femininity premium” refers to the personal gains from adhering to hegemonic femininity:
Better treatment by men (marriage prospects, job opportunities).
Social protection (law enforcement favors white women, e.g., Emmett Till case).
Higher social status (beauty, respectability, wealth).
However, there is also a “femininity tax”:
Restricts women’s autonomy (sexuality, careers).
Upholds male dominance, limiting women’s collective power.
Intersectional Domination: How Hegemonic Femininities Enforce Inequality
Privileged women use femininity as a tool to dominate others:
Race: White femininity reinforces racism (e.g., Carolyn Bryant in the Emmett Till case).
Class: Wealthy women police social boundaries (e.g., excluding working-class and racialized women from elite spaces).
Sexuality: Heterosexual femininity reinforces heteronormativity (e.g., stigma against queer women).
Jordan Peele’s Get Out as an example:
Character Rose Armitage weaponizes her white femininity to lure Black men into danger.
Shows how white femininity is used to manipulate and oppress.
Tactics and Trades: How Women Navigate the Matrix of Domination
Women in privileged positions engage in “patriarchal bargains”:
They trade gender equality for racial/class privilege.
Aligning with hegemonic masculinity allows them to gain power over marginalized groups.
Key Intersectional Tactics:
Performing beauty norms → Gains femininity premium but reinforces white beauty standards.
Claiming victimhood (e.g., white women’s tears) → Invokes protection from white men but harms marginalized groups.
Policing other women → Rich white women gatekeep social status (e.g., controlling who is “respectable”).
Femininity is not passive – it is a tool of power and domination.
Hegemonic femininities are intersectional – they uphold racial, class, and gender inequalities simultaneously.
The femininity premium motivates complicity – women who approximate ideal femininity gain social benefits at the expense of others.
Privileged women use femininity as a weapon – e.g., white women using racism for personal advantage.
Understanding femininities within the matrix of domination provides a better framework than a gender-only analysis.
Arlie Hochschild’s The second shift: working families and the revolution at home argued that the revolution towards gender equality in the US has been stalled due to
Women continue to do most of the second shift
Primarily focuses on this
Insufficient flexibility in the workplace for accommodating family caregiving needs
A deficit of public sector benefits (paid parental leave)
Since publication issues remain
Leisure gap at home
Studied 50 heterosexual married couples with full time jobs and young children
Areas of stability in the gender structure and areas of transformation in the past quarter center
Deepseated cultural understanding of gender infuse all levels of analysis : macro-level policies, family and work institutions and personal experiences of gender, intimacy and moral commitments
Show the paths forward for new research on how new economic developments (economic insecurity, flexibilization {increasingly reliance on temporary and contract labour} and the widening social class divide continue to affect intimacy at home
Housework as viewed as less of a burden for women
Economy of gratitude - wives evaluate fairness of housework spilt based on experiences of other wives, and husbands with husbands
The article explores changes and continuities in these issues over the past 25 years.
Creates a leisure gap where women work significantly more total hours (paid + unpaid) than men.
Good jobs assume an ‘ideal worker’ model: full-time, continuous employment without family responsibilities.
Couples develop narratives to justify inequality in domestic labor (e.g., splitting tasks unevenly but calling it ‘equal’).
Gender norms still influence career paths and division of labor at home.
In 1950: 33% of working-age women in paid work, 1980: 52% → 2013: 57%.
Mothers’ participation rose significantly (e.g., 47% of mothers with children under 6 worked in 1980 vs. 64% in 2013).
Gender wage gap decreased: 1970 (62.3 cents per male dollar) → 1989 (70.1 cents) → 2013 (82.1 cents).
‘Work devotion schema’ persists, rewarding long hours and commitment over work-life balance.
Lower-income men disengaging from family roles, leaving single mothers financially strained.
Unstable, low-wage work creates economic precarity for families.
Increasing reliance on contract and temporary labor reduces job security.
Low-income workers face unpredictable schedules, making caregiving difficult.
Workers using work-life balance policies (e.g., parental leave, reduced hours) are penalized in their careers.
Particularly affects men who take caregiving roles, as workplace culture equates flexibility with lack of commitment.
Long hours associated with masculinity and career success.
Professional men feel pressure to overwork, impacting family life.
Social expectations shape perceptions of fairness in relationships (e.g., women feel ‘grateful’ if their husband helps at home, even if unequally distributed).
Higher-income couples can outsource household labor (e.g., hiring domestic workers), whereas lower-income women bear the full burden of paid and unpaid work.
Feminist movement and entrance of women in the work force
Criticsm of the notion that women entering the work force would liberate them from male domination
Saying to working class women that feminism isnt for them
Working for low wages did not liberate poor and working class women
Wage gap / women still dont get equal pay
73 cents to the dollar
Work has benefits on self esteen and positive participation in community compared to stay at home work
Home was relaxing to women only when men and children were not present
Spends time tending to others, home is a workplace
Poverty as a central woman issue
Dismantling the welfare system deprives indigent women
Return to patriarchal male-dominated households