Reminder for students to log their attendance on Moodle.
Title: Attachment Theory
Course: Human Development
Presented by: Dr. Katie McArthur (she/her)
Lecture Series Overview:
Lecture 1: Cognitive Development
Lecture 2: Attachment Theory
Lecture 3: Parenting
Lecture 4: Adolescence
By the end of this lecture, students will be able to:
Describe key research underlying attachment theory.
Identify contributions of Bowlby and Ainsworth to attachment theory.
Understand the limitations of attachment theory.
Attachment is defined as:
"A deep and enduring emotional bond that connects one person to another across time and space."
Focus of developmental psychologists:
Early relationships with attachment figures influence social and emotional development of children.
“Cupboard Love” (Freud):
Child's drive centers around feeding, where the mother is seen primarily as a source of food.
Drive Reduction Learning Theory:
Mother perceived as associated with food, leading to attachment driven by need fulfillment.
Attachment is not solely based on food; it involves psychological and emotional comfort.
Evidence comes from various sources, including ethological research.
Conducted by Harry Harlow (1958):
Rhesus monkeys raised without mothers, placed in cages with a "wire mother" (nutrition) and a "cloth mother" (contact comfort).
Preference for the cloth mother highlights the significance of emotional bonding over mere provisioning of food.
Research by Lorenz (1966):
Study on imprinting in animals, establishing a critical period for forming attachments; this concept was thought to be irreversible once past the critical timeframe.
Highlighted biological mechanisms for attachment in birds.
John Bowlby (1907-1990):
Psychoanalyst who developed attachment theory in the 1940s, deviating from traditional psychoanalytic thought.
Influenced by his personal childhood experiences and research in psychiatric settings.
Rutter et al (1998; 2011):
Research on Romanian orphanages suggesting a critical period for attachment formation.
Bowlby (1944):
Conducted retrospective studies linking lack of attachment to ongoing relationship difficulties and behavioral issues (Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis).
Skeels & Dye (1939):
Study comparing orphans raised in "normal" institutions versus a women's care home directed to show the importance of maternal figures.
Robertson & Robertson (1971):
Findings that children separated from mothers adapted better with attentive substitute caregivers.
Bowlby et al (1956):
Observed no behavioral or social differences in children hospitalized under age 4 compared to control groups.
Evans & Kelley (2002):
Concerns highlighted maternal employment impairing maternal roles; however, emotional deprivation was also addressed.
Mendolia (2014):
Findings indicating children of working mothers did not exhibit higher rates of smoking, low self-esteem, or reduced educational attainment by age 16.
Central conclusion (Bowlby, 1953):
Essential for mental health is a warm, continuous relationship with a primary caregiver that provides satisfaction and enjoyment.
Emphasizes social context, health, and economic factors regarding attachment.
Advocated integrating the context in which mothers operate to assist their children effectively.
Quote: "If a community values its children, it must cherish their parents" (Bowlby, 1951).
Bowlby proposed a critical period for attachment between 6 months and 3 years, during which continuous love and care are crucial.
Concept of "Monotropy":
Highlighting the importance of attachment to one primary caregiver, with detrimental effects of separation.
Mary Ainsworth (1913-1999):
Collaborated with Bowlby in developing attachment theory and conducted the first empirical studies on mother-child attachments focused on the concept of the secure base.
Ainsworth conducted observational studies of mothers and infants (under 2 years), starting in Uganda and later in the US.
Introduced the concept of a secure base where the mother enables the child to balance closeness and autonomy.
Maternal sensitivity is linked to the developmental quality of attachment.
Ainsworth's observational framework:
Infants (12 months old) observed in 20 minutes across 8 stages involving mother, stranger, and interactions in a playroom setting.
Findings from Ainsworth (1973) categorized attachment as:
Secure attachment.
Insecure attachment (further categorized into insecure-avoidant and insecure-ambivalent)
Disorganized attachment later added by Main & Solomon (1986).
Indicators of secure attachment:
Infant plays, interacts with the stranger, may show distress upon separation but is easily comforted upon mother’s return.
Strongly linked to sensitive caregiving (Grossman et al, 1985).
Traits include:
Distant behavior in mother's presence, emotionless play, superficial interactions, and ignoring mother upon her return.
Associated with impatient or unresponsive caregiving (Isabella, 1993).
Identified behaviors:
Difficulty adjusting to new environments, extreme distress upon separation, and minimal interaction with strangers.
Linked to inconsistent caregiving (Isabella, 1993).
Notable patterns include:
Lacking organized methods for dealing with stress; displaying inconsistent behaviors and a wary stance towards the mother.
Result of frightening caregiving practices, origins of which are complex (Bernier & Meins, 2008).
Research indicates:
Stability of attachment patterns over time; securely attached infants often show favorable outcomes in later life (Main & Cassidy, 1988; Schneider et al, 2001).
Key points:
Cultural biases observed in attachment patterns (Grossman et al, 1985; Rothbaum et al, 2000).
Attachment is relational, not an individual trait; children may vary attachment security depending on parental figures (Goossens & van Ijzendoorn, 1990; Sroufe, 1985).
The role of child temperament may be underestimated (Kagan, 1994).
Resilience is defined as:
"Normal development under difficult conditions."
Findings indicate:
Attachment styles can change over time; children with limited maternal support early may still achieve secure attachments later (Beijersbergen, 2012).
Maltreatment can affect attachment security but doesn't definitively dictate attachment style (van Ijzendoorn et al, 2011).
Findings from Harlow's isolation studies show:
Disturbed behavior in isolated monkeys, leading to aggression, and withdrawal.
Lasting effects beyond extended separations indicated developmental challenges in social interactions and parenting.
Examined previously isolated young monkeys:
Initially withdrawn and socially dysfunctional, exhibited recovery with peer interactions, particularly with younger healthy peers.
Shift toward recognizing the importance of alloparenting (e.g., grandparental influence).
Notable findings:
Presence of any supportive adult is crucial for resilience against trauma (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2015).
Support reduces postpartum depression in new mothers (Kendall-Tackett, 2017).
D.W. Winnicott’s view (1964/1965):
Emphasizes a mother’s sensitive responsiveness, allowing infants to face manageable frustrations.
Aiming for a "good enough" mother fosters balanced growth and independence.
Data from British Youth Panel (1994-2006):
Highlights that employed mothers do not necessarily compromise child engagement.
Improvements noted in quality time spent, surpassed 1974 levels despite professional commitments.
Important terminology includes:
Secure attachment
Insecure attachment (avoidant, ambivalent, disorganized)
Secure base
Resilience
Monotropy vs. alloparenting
The good enough mother
Dr. Katie McArthur
Email: katherine.mcarthur@glasgow.ac.uk
Office Hours: Tuesdays 11-1 (Online or Room 423, 62 Hillhead Street)
Reminder to log attendance on Moodle.