L1 Lecture 2 Attachment - Tagged

Page 1: Attendance

  • Reminder for students to log their attendance on Moodle.

Page 2: Introduction to Lecture

  • Title: Attachment Theory

  • Course: Human Development

  • Presented by: Dr. Katie McArthur (she/her)

Page 3: Overview of Developmental Psychology Course

  • Lecture Series Overview:

    • Lecture 1: Cognitive Development

    • Lecture 2: Attachment Theory

    • Lecture 3: Parenting

    • Lecture 4: Adolescence

Page 4: Intended Learning Outcomes

  • By the end of this lecture, students will be able to:

    • Describe key research underlying attachment theory.

    • Identify contributions of Bowlby and Ainsworth to attachment theory.

    • Understand the limitations of attachment theory.

Page 5: Definition of Attachment

  • Attachment is defined as:

    • "A deep and enduring emotional bond that connects one person to another across time and space."

  • Focus of developmental psychologists:

    • Early relationships with attachment figures influence social and emotional development of children.

Page 6: Why Do Infants Attach? - Early Theories

  • “Cupboard Love” (Freud):

    • Child's drive centers around feeding, where the mother is seen primarily as a source of food.

  • Drive Reduction Learning Theory:

    • Mother perceived as associated with food, leading to attachment driven by need fulfillment.

Page 7: Attachment Bond Evidence

  • Attachment is not solely based on food; it involves psychological and emotional comfort.

  • Evidence comes from various sources, including ethological research.

Page 8: Harlow’s Monkeys Study

  • Conducted by Harry Harlow (1958):

    • Rhesus monkeys raised without mothers, placed in cages with a "wire mother" (nutrition) and a "cloth mother" (contact comfort).

    • Preference for the cloth mother highlights the significance of emotional bonding over mere provisioning of food.

Page 9: Critical Period for Imprinting

  • Research by Lorenz (1966):

    • Study on imprinting in animals, establishing a critical period for forming attachments; this concept was thought to be irreversible once past the critical timeframe.

  • Highlighted biological mechanisms for attachment in birds.

Page 10: John Bowlby’s Contributions

  • John Bowlby (1907-1990):

    • Psychoanalyst who developed attachment theory in the 1940s, deviating from traditional psychoanalytic thought.

    • Influenced by his personal childhood experiences and research in psychiatric settings.

Page 11: Human Research on Attachment

  • Rutter et al (1998; 2011):

    • Research on Romanian orphanages suggesting a critical period for attachment formation.

  • Bowlby (1944):

    • Conducted retrospective studies linking lack of attachment to ongoing relationship difficulties and behavioral issues (Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis).

Page 12: Studies on Maternal Deprivation

  • Skeels & Dye (1939):

    • Study comparing orphans raised in "normal" institutions versus a women's care home directed to show the importance of maternal figures.

  • Robertson & Robertson (1971):

    • Findings that children separated from mothers adapted better with attentive substitute caregivers.

  • Bowlby et al (1956):

    • Observed no behavioral or social differences in children hospitalized under age 4 compared to control groups.

Page 13: Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis Insights

  • Evans & Kelley (2002):

    • Concerns highlighted maternal employment impairing maternal roles; however, emotional deprivation was also addressed.

  • Mendolia (2014):

    • Findings indicating children of working mothers did not exhibit higher rates of smoking, low self-esteem, or reduced educational attainment by age 16.

Page 14: Bowlby’s Conclusions

  • Central conclusion (Bowlby, 1953):

    • Essential for mental health is a warm, continuous relationship with a primary caregiver that provides satisfaction and enjoyment.

Page 15: Bowlby’s Social Context Perspective

  • Emphasizes social context, health, and economic factors regarding attachment.

  • Advocated integrating the context in which mothers operate to assist their children effectively.

  • Quote: "If a community values its children, it must cherish their parents" (Bowlby, 1951).

Page 16: Bowlby’s Critical Period

  • Bowlby proposed a critical period for attachment between 6 months and 3 years, during which continuous love and care are crucial.

  • Concept of "Monotropy":

    • Highlighting the importance of attachment to one primary caregiver, with detrimental effects of separation.

Page 17: Mary Ainsworth’s Role

  • Mary Ainsworth (1913-1999):

    • Collaborated with Bowlby in developing attachment theory and conducted the first empirical studies on mother-child attachments focused on the concept of the secure base.

Page 18: Ainsworth's Research Methodology

  • Ainsworth conducted observational studies of mothers and infants (under 2 years), starting in Uganda and later in the US.

  • Introduced the concept of a secure base where the mother enables the child to balance closeness and autonomy.

  • Maternal sensitivity is linked to the developmental quality of attachment.

Page 19: The Strange Situation

  • Ainsworth's observational framework:

    • Infants (12 months old) observed in 20 minutes across 8 stages involving mother, stranger, and interactions in a playroom setting.

Page 20: Categories of Attachment Quality

  • Findings from Ainsworth (1973) categorized attachment as:

    • Secure attachment.

    • Insecure attachment (further categorized into insecure-avoidant and insecure-ambivalent)

    • Disorganized attachment later added by Main & Solomon (1986).

Page 21: Characteristics of Secure Attachment

  • Indicators of secure attachment:

    • Infant plays, interacts with the stranger, may show distress upon separation but is easily comforted upon mother’s return.

    • Strongly linked to sensitive caregiving (Grossman et al, 1985).

Page 22: Insecure Avoidant Attachment

  • Traits include:

    • Distant behavior in mother's presence, emotionless play, superficial interactions, and ignoring mother upon her return.

    • Associated with impatient or unresponsive caregiving (Isabella, 1993).

Page 23: Insecure Ambivalent Attachment

  • Identified behaviors:

    • Difficulty adjusting to new environments, extreme distress upon separation, and minimal interaction with strangers.

    • Linked to inconsistent caregiving (Isabella, 1993).

Page 24: Characteristics of Disorganized Attachment

  • Notable patterns include:

    • Lacking organized methods for dealing with stress; displaying inconsistent behaviors and a wary stance towards the mother.

    • Result of frightening caregiving practices, origins of which are complex (Bernier & Meins, 2008).

Page 25: Attachment Styles and Stability

  • Research indicates:

    • Stability of attachment patterns over time; securely attached infants often show favorable outcomes in later life (Main & Cassidy, 1988; Schneider et al, 2001).

Page 26: Limitations of Attachment Theory

  • Key points:

    • Cultural biases observed in attachment patterns (Grossman et al, 1985; Rothbaum et al, 2000).

    • Attachment is relational, not an individual trait; children may vary attachment security depending on parental figures (Goossens & van Ijzendoorn, 1990; Sroufe, 1985).

    • The role of child temperament may be underestimated (Kagan, 1994).

Page 27: Concept of Resilience

  • Resilience is defined as:

    • "Normal development under difficult conditions."

  • Findings indicate:

    • Attachment styles can change over time; children with limited maternal support early may still achieve secure attachments later (Beijersbergen, 2012).

    • Maltreatment can affect attachment security but doesn't definitively dictate attachment style (van Ijzendoorn et al, 2011).

Page 28: Evidence of Resilience: Harlow’s Monkeys

  • Findings from Harlow's isolation studies show:

    • Disturbed behavior in isolated monkeys, leading to aggression, and withdrawal.

    • Lasting effects beyond extended separations indicated developmental challenges in social interactions and parenting.

Page 29: Harlow’s Later Resilience Studies

  • Examined previously isolated young monkeys:

    • Initially withdrawn and socially dysfunctional, exhibited recovery with peer interactions, particularly with younger healthy peers.

Page 30: New Developments in Attachment Theory

  • Shift toward recognizing the importance of alloparenting (e.g., grandparental influence).

  • Notable findings:

    • Presence of any supportive adult is crucial for resilience against trauma (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2015).

    • Support reduces postpartum depression in new mothers (Kendall-Tackett, 2017).

Page 31: Winnicott’s Contributions

  • D.W. Winnicott’s view (1964/1965):

    • Emphasizes a mother’s sensitive responsiveness, allowing infants to face manageable frustrations.

    • Aiming for a "good enough" mother fosters balanced growth and independence.

Page 32: Maternal Employment Impact

  • Data from British Youth Panel (1994-2006):

    • Highlights that employed mothers do not necessarily compromise child engagement.

    • Improvements noted in quality time spent, surpassed 1974 levels despite professional commitments.

Page 33: Key Terms in Attachment Theory

  • Important terminology includes:

    • Secure attachment

    • Insecure attachment (avoidant, ambivalent, disorganized)

    • Secure base

    • Resilience

    • Monotropy vs. alloparenting

    • The good enough mother

Page 34: Contact Information

  • Dr. Katie McArthur

    • Email: katherine.mcarthur@glasgow.ac.uk

    • Office Hours: Tuesdays 11-1 (Online or Room 423, 62 Hillhead Street)

  • Reminder to log attendance on Moodle.

robot