Federalism: The division of power between national, state, and local governments.
Characteristics: Sunlight on creativity, cooperation, conflicts, and chaos.
Jose Antonio Vargas: Undocumented immigrant pulled over for speeding during election night.
Outcome of the Stop: The sheriff let him go, showcasing the anxiety faced by many undocumented individuals.
Statistics: Approximately 11 million undocumented individuals in the U.S. face detention and deportation risks.
Sanctuary Cities: Over 500 cities and 7 states have declared sanctuary statuses, allowing undocumented individuals access to essential services without inquiry into legal status.
Argument for Sanctuaries: Protect human rights and community safety.
Opposition: Undocumented immigrants are seen as a drain on resources, job markets, and societal cohesion.
Purpose of the Chapter: Understand federalism, its historical evolution, strengths, weaknesses, and contemporary challenges.
Conflict in Federalism: Competing authorities often lead to a lack of consensus on issues like immigration, law enforcement, and public services.
Constitutional Authority: Federal government holds primary control over immigration policies.
Changes Under Trump Administration: Executive power expanded within ICE to combat illegal immigration.
Texas Example: State laws versus city protections for undocumented individuals.
Impact of the Biden Administration: Policies shifted from deportation freezes to legal challenges against enforcement lapses.
Uniqueness: U.S. federalism contrasts with other countries by intertwining powers, leading to a tangled jurisdictional landscape.
Historical roots trace back to the founding debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Roles of Local Governments: Local authorities have both power and dependency on state governments, revealing complexities in governance.
Dillon's Rule: Local governments can only exercise powers expressly granted by states.
Power Sharing: National, state, and local governments share responsibilities, leading to overlapping authorities and unclear boundaries.
Public Sentiment: Americans tend to trust local governments more than state or federal levels due to perceived proximity and accountability.
Dual Federalism (1789-1933): Clear lines existed between state and national roles. Each level operated independently.
Functions: National focused on defense, foreign relations; states handled local governance including education and law enforcement.
Cooperative Federalism (1933-1981): Roles blurred with collaboration following the New Deal.
Example: Federal grants led to shared programs, blurring lines between governmental responsibilities.
Contested Federalism (1981-2024): Shifting power dynamics, conflicting responsibilities among federal, state, and local governments.
Progressive vs. New Federalism: National standards versus local control; parties switch positions based on political climate.
Climate Change & Healthcare: Different levels of government handle various aspects, leading to conflicts in policies, regulations, and priorities.
Example: States and municipalities often act independently to address climate change goals, contrasting national efforts.
Devolution and Unfunded Mandates: The ongoing push towards transferring responsibility to states, often with inadequate funding to implement federal standards.
Courts play a critical role in deciding federalism disputes over the balance of power between national and state authorities.
Historic rulings often lean toward expanding national power, but recent years show a trend toward reinforcing state powers.
Key Supreme Court Cases: Significant decisions have both favored state authorities (e.g., health care decisions) and affirmed national aims (e.g., civil rights).
Nationalism is a complex sentiment that aids in maintaining unity but can lead to divisive forms of identity politics.
Civic voluntarism reflects citizen engagement and cooperativeness in addressing public policy issues.
American federalism marks a persistent interplay between fragmentation and unity. Challenges revolve around the balance between local responsiveness and national standards.
The future of federalism holds tensions that reflect broader political and social issues within American society.