The Constitutional Basis for Judicial Power
The Founders agreed a stronger national government outweighed potential liberty infringements, including legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Four features ensure a powerful judiciary:
Separate branch in the Constitution
Hierarchical authority among courts
[[judicial review]]
The Supreme Court can strike down actions violating the Constitution, justified via the [[supremacy clause]].
Lifetime appointments for federal judges
Judges are appointed, not elected, ensuring impartiality.
Linked to other branches: president appoints, Senate confirms, Congress funds.
Senators must support nominees from their state ([[senatorial courtesy]]). The Senate Judiciary Committee considers, and the full Senate confirms.
[[Judicial Review]]
Marbury v. Madison
Established judicial review: the Supreme Court can declare laws unconstitutional.
Federal Supremacy
[[McCulloch v. Maryland]] (1813) and [[Gibbons v. Ogden]] (1824)
Supreme Court has final word over state laws and courts.
Judges are not elected; they can approach conflicts neutrally.
Prisoner’s Dilemmas: Impartial courts ensure contract enforcement.
Coordination Problems: Judicial review ensures a single interpretation of the law.
Cases are civil or criminal. A #plaintiff files charges; the #defendant faces them.
[[Civil Cases]]: result from suing for failure to uphold civil code.
Losers pay damages, not arrested.
Civil cases over $75,000 involving multiple states may be heard in federal or state courts.
Two common types: #contracts and #torts
[[contract cases]]: violation of an agreement between parties
[[tort cases]]: injury due to negligence or malfeasance
[[Public Law]]: involves government power or citizen rights
[[constitutional law]]: determines if government actions align with the Constitution
Congress can't abrogate constitutional rulings without an amendment.
[[administrative law]]: disputes over administrative agencies’ authority
[[Class Action Lawsuits]]: filed by a group of individuals to prevent coordination problems
[[Criminal Cases]]: government charges a person with a crime against society
Federal Jurisdiction
Constitution mentions Supreme Court, but Congress expands judicial system via [[The Judiciary Act]] of 1789.
Lower-level courts solve disputes; their decisions stand unless controversial.
Nearly 99% of cases are in state courts: cases start in a [[trial court]], appeal to [[state court of appeals]], then to state supreme court.
U.S. government cases are heard in federal courts.
Military operates under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
[[Article III]] gives Supreme Court [[appellate jurisdiction]] in federal cases and [[original jurisdiction]] in cases involving ambassadors/states.
[[appellate jurisdiction]]: cases appealed from lower court
[[original jurisdiction]]: cases taken directly to federal court
[[District Courts]](Federal Trial Courts): lowest level of federal judiciary with [[original jurisdiction]]
[[Circuit Courts]](Federal Appellate Courts): divided into 12 circuits, each with [[appellate courts]] that can overrule lower courts
The [[Supreme Court]]: has [[original jurisdiction]] in limited cases per [[Article III]]; hears cases between states, federal disputes, and constitutionality of a law
Rules of Access: courts require a case or controversy, standing, and mootness. Courts are passive; they wait for lawsuits.
Supreme Court hears about 1% of cases. [[writ of certiorari]] ([[rule of four]]) signifies Court's acceptance.
Controlling the Flow of Cases: [[solicitor general]] and [[federal law clerks]] shape flow of cases.
Solicitor generals screen cases and can file [[amicus curiae]] briefs; law clerks research legal issues
Courts apply statues and precedents ([[stare decisis]]). Interpretations are subject to Congressional review.
Decisions serve as precedents, leading to [[common law]]. A tie lets the lower-courts decision stand.
Standard Procedure
Briefs and Oral Arguments: interested parties file amicus curiae briefs; arguments followed by questions aiming to comprehend opposing perspectives; justices disclose individual perspectives
Private Discussion (The Conference): justices take preliminary vote to arrive at a decision
Opinion Writing: justices assign task of writing a formal opinion to clarify their ruling.
Majority Opinion: the chief justice often writes the majority opinion, shaping legal interpretation.
Concurring & Dissenting Opinions: Justices write concurring opinions to specify their reasoning; dissenting opinions explain disagreement with the Court’s ruling
[[The Legal Model]]: justices focus solely on facts, precedent, Constitution, and Founders' intent ( [[judicial restraint]]).
[[The Strategic Model]]: justices consider factors beyond facts/precedent, consulting political context.
[[The Attitudinal Model]]: justices base opinions on political predispositions ([[judicial activism]]).
lower courts apply principles; executive branch enforces decisions; State legislators/Governors implement decisions; unsympathetic agencies may obstruct
Public Approval: from the Court’s reputation of being “above politics”
Marginalized Groups: Court is seen as a friend due to civil rights cases
[[Congress]]: Can recraft legislation (statutory ruling) or initiate a constitutional amendment (constitutional ruling) if unhappy with the Court’s decision.
The Executive Branch: president nominates justices and enforces the Court's decision