A

The Judicial Branch

The Constitutional Basis for Judicial Power

A Strong National Government
  • The Founders agreed a stronger national government outweighed potential liberty infringements, including legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

  • Four features ensure a powerful judiciary:

    1. Separate branch in the Constitution

    2. Hierarchical authority among courts

    3. [[judicial review]]

    • The Supreme Court can strike down actions violating the Constitution, justified via the [[supremacy clause]].

    1. Lifetime appointments for federal judges

Judiciary Appointments
  • Judges are appointed, not elected, ensuring impartiality.

  • Linked to other branches: president appoints, Senate confirms, Congress funds.

  • Senators must support nominees from their state ([[senatorial courtesy]]). The Senate Judiciary Committee considers, and the full Senate confirms.

Early Court Cases That Expanded Judicial Power
  • [[Judicial Review]]

    • Marbury v. Madison

    • Established judicial review: the Supreme Court can declare laws unconstitutional.

  • Federal Supremacy

    • [[McCulloch v. Maryland]] (1813) and [[Gibbons v. Ogden]] (1824)

    • Supreme Court has final word over state laws and courts.

How the Judiciary Solves Collective Dilemmas
  • Judges are not elected; they can approach conflicts neutrally.

  • Prisoner’s Dilemmas: Impartial courts ensure contract enforcement.

  • Coordination Problems: Judicial review ensures a single interpretation of the law.

Types of Court Cases
  • Cases are civil or criminal. A #plaintiff files charges; the #defendant faces them.

    • [[Civil Cases]]: result from suing for failure to uphold civil code.

    • Losers pay damages, not arrested.

    • Civil cases over $75,000 involving multiple states may be heard in federal or state courts.

    • Two common types: #contracts and #torts

      • [[contract cases]]: violation of an agreement between parties

      • [[tort cases]]: injury due to negligence or malfeasance

    • [[Public Law]]: involves government power or citizen rights

      • [[constitutional law]]: determines if government actions align with the Constitution

      • Congress can't abrogate constitutional rulings without an amendment.

      • [[administrative law]]: disputes over administrative agencies’ authority

    • [[Class Action Lawsuits]]: filed by a group of individuals to prevent coordination problems

    • [[Criminal Cases]]: government charges a person with a crime against society

The Organization of the American Judicial System
  • Federal Jurisdiction

    • Constitution mentions Supreme Court, but Congress expands judicial system via [[The Judiciary Act]] of 1789.

    • Lower-level courts solve disputes; their decisions stand unless controversial.

    • Nearly 99% of cases are in state courts: cases start in a [[trial court]], appeal to [[state court of appeals]], then to state supreme court.

    • U.S. government cases are heard in federal courts.

    • Military operates under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

    • [[Article III]] gives Supreme Court [[appellate jurisdiction]] in federal cases and [[original jurisdiction]] in cases involving ambassadors/states.

    • [[appellate jurisdiction]]: cases appealed from lower court

    • [[original jurisdiction]]: cases taken directly to federal court

    • [[District Courts]](Federal Trial Courts): lowest level of federal judiciary with [[original jurisdiction]]

    • [[Circuit Courts]](Federal Appellate Courts): divided into 12 circuits, each with [[appellate courts]] that can overrule lower courts

    • The [[Supreme Court]]: has [[original jurisdiction]] in limited cases per [[Article III]]; hears cases between states, federal disputes, and constitutionality of a law

How a Case Arrives to the Supreme Court
  • Rules of Access: courts require a case or controversy, standing, and mootness. Courts are passive; they wait for lawsuits.

    • Supreme Court hears about 1% of cases. [[writ of certiorari]] ([[rule of four]]) signifies Court's acceptance.

  • Controlling the Flow of Cases: [[solicitor general]] and [[federal law clerks]] shape flow of cases.

    • Solicitor generals screen cases and can file [[amicus curiae]] briefs; law clerks research legal issues

Judicial Decision Making
  • Courts apply statues and precedents ([[stare decisis]]). Interpretations are subject to Congressional review.

    • Decisions serve as precedents, leading to [[common law]]. A tie lets the lower-courts decision stand.

  • Standard Procedure

    • Briefs and Oral Arguments: interested parties file amicus curiae briefs; arguments followed by questions aiming to comprehend opposing perspectives; justices disclose individual perspectives

    • Private Discussion (The Conference): justices take preliminary vote to arrive at a decision

    • Opinion Writing: justices assign task of writing a formal opinion to clarify their ruling.

    • Majority Opinion: the chief justice often writes the majority opinion, shaping legal interpretation.

    • Concurring & Dissenting Opinions: Justices write concurring opinions to specify their reasoning; dissenting opinions explain disagreement with the Court’s ruling

Models of Judicial Decision Making
  • [[The Legal Model]]: justices focus solely on facts, precedent, Constitution, and Founders' intent ( [[judicial restraint]]).

  • [[The Strategic Model]]: justices consider factors beyond facts/precedent, consulting political context.

  • [[The Attitudinal Model]]: justices base opinions on political predispositions ([[judicial activism]]).

Decision Implementation
  • lower courts apply principles; executive branch enforces decisions; State legislators/Governors implement decisions; unsympathetic agencies may obstruct

Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court
  • Public Approval: from the Court’s reputation of being “above politics”

  • Marginalized Groups: Court is seen as a friend due to civil rights cases

Relationships with Other Branches of Government
  • [[Congress]]: Can recraft legislation (statutory ruling) or initiate a constitutional amendment (constitutional ruling) if unhappy with the Court’s decision.

  • The Executive Branch: president nominates justices and enforces the Court's decision