Overview of the purpose of the video:
Preparation for Analysing Data Takeaway Paper and Psychobiology Workshop.
Focus on understanding the experiment conducted with computerized rats and its analysis.
Importance of learning concepts in the experimental context.
Types of Learning:
Humans and animals learn facts and associations in their environment.
Associative Learning: Learning associations between stimuli and events.
Classical Conditioning:
Also known as Pavlovian conditioning.
Passive learning about associations (e.g., Pavlov's dogs associating bell with food).
Operant Conditioning:
Named after B.F. Skinner.
Active learning where actions lead to consequences (also called instrumental conditioning).
Focus on behavior shaping by its outcomes.
Skinner Box:
A controlled environment for studying behavior; contains a lever and food cup.
Rats learn to associate lever pressing with sugar delivery.
Positive Reinforcement:
Behavior is more likely to occur due to positive outcomes, like receiving food (sugar).
Negative Reinforcement:
Behavior is more likely to occur to avoid negative outcomes, such as foot shocks or unpleasant sounds.
Thorndike's Laws:
Law of Effect: Behaviors leading to positive outcomes are likely to recur.
Frequencies of behaviors strengthen these learned associations.
Consequences:
Can either reinforce (increase likelihood) or deter (reduce likelihood) behavior.
Reinforcement Types:
Positive outcomes (e.g., sugar) and negative outcomes (e.g., avoiding shocks) both reinforce behavior.
Definition: Rules dictating how often and when reinforcement occurs.
Different Schedules:
Ratio Schedules:
Reinforcement based on number of responses.
Fixed Ratio (FR): A consistent number of responses (e.g., FR-6).
Variable Ratio (VR): Average number of responses varies (e.g., VR-6).
Interval Schedules:
Reinforcement based on the time elapsed.
Fixed Interval (FI): Same time must pass (e.g., FI-8 seconds).
Variable Interval (VI): Average time varies (e.g., VI-8 seconds).
Effects on Behavior:
Higher rates of responses observed under ratio schedules compared to interval schedules.
Objective: Explore whether ratio training is more effective in terms of cost-benefit (more pressing, less food).
Hypothesis: Training under ratio schedules leads to more lever presses but fewer food rewards compared to interval training.
Use of Virtual Rats (Sniffy):
Sniffy represents a virtual rat in an operant conditioning scenario.
Motivation: Sniffy is consistently hungry.
Procedure:
Four groups of ten virtual rats trained under different schedules after initial continuous reinforcement phase.
Schedules: Fixed Ratio 6, Variable Ratio 6, Fixed Interval 8, Variable Interval 8.
Dependent Variables: Number of lever presses and food rewards over a 10-minute timeframe.
Data Collection: Monitored rat behavior to gather data for analysis in take-home assignments.
View Sniffy's behavior under the different schedules in provided video, "Sniffy in the Experiment."