Property Damage Standards:
Officers must keep property damage to a minimum during warrant executions.
Forcible entry is permitted if a door is locked or barricaded, or during searches covered by a warrant.
Property damage is only justified if it does not "shock the conscience."
Using Force:
Force may be necessary when executing arrest or search warrants.
Standards governing the use of deadly or non-deadly force apply when faced with resistance or potential attacks.
Search Timing:
Most search warrants specify they must be executed during the daytime.
Officers can obtain warrants for nighttime searches or special instructions to bypass this limit.
Scope and Manner of Searches:
Searches must be reasonable and proportional to the item sought.
For example, if searching for large stolen items like televisions, small spaces (drawers, cabinets) are off-limits.
Media Involvement:
Media members cannot accompany police on search warrant executions unless for law enforcement purposes (e.g., training documentation).
Warrant Requirement:
Generally, police must secure a warrant for searches under the Fourth Amendment.
Exceptions exist, including:
Exigent circumstances.
Stop and frisk.
Searches incident to lawful arrest.
Automobile searches.
Consensual searches.
Searches based on plain view.
Discovered crimes in an officer's presence.
Criteria for Legality:
Warrantless searches must be reasonable.
Actions based on prior behavior alone (e.g., previous drug dealing) do not justify searches without other supporting factors.
Post-Arrest Protocol:
Individuals subjected to warrantless arrests are entitled to a probable cause hearing to assess the legitimacy of the arrest.
Definition & Examples:
Exigent circumstances allow police to act without a warrant in emergencies. Examples include:
Hot pursuit: Immediate action to prevent escape or harm.
Danger of evidence destruction: Immediate entry to preserve evidence being destroyed.
Threats to others: Police may act without warrants to protect lives in dangerous situations.
Requirements for Hot Pursuit Justification:
Probable cause that the suspect is present.
Reasonable belief immediate apprehension is necessary.
Pursuit begins from a lawful position.
The offense must be serious (typically a felony).
Pursuit must occur before or closely following apprehension.
Examples of Urgency:
Police can intervene without a warrant if there’s reason to believe evidence (like drugs) will be destroyed.
Police Actions to Protect Life:
Examples include intervening in hostage situations or responding to domestic disturbances if lives are in danger.
Through-Wall Radar Technology:
Advanced technology allowing officers to detect movement within buildings without visual contact.
Raises Fourth Amendment concerns regarding privacy and search without warrants.
Definition and Protocol:
Involves detaining and patting down a suspicious individual.
Requires reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause.
Components:
Stop: Brief detention.
Frisk: Check for weapons.
Key Legal Precedents:
Terry v. Ohio (1968) established the basis for stop and frisk practices, determining reasonable suspicion suffices for limited searches for weapons.
Illinois v. Wardlow (2000): Presence in a high-crime area, combined with flight, can constitute reasonable suspicion.