Chapter 8 CJS

Chapter 8: Police and the Rule of Law

Property Damage Considerations

  • Property Damage Standards:

    • Officers must keep property damage to a minimum during warrant executions.

    • Forcible entry is permitted if a door is locked or barricaded, or during searches covered by a warrant.

    • Property damage is only justified if it does not "shock the conscience."

Appropriate Use of Force

  • Using Force:

    • Force may be necessary when executing arrest or search warrants.

    • Standards governing the use of deadly or non-deadly force apply when faced with resistance or potential attacks.

Time Constraints with Search Warrants

  • Search Timing:

    • Most search warrants specify they must be executed during the daytime.

    • Officers can obtain warrants for nighttime searches or special instructions to bypass this limit.

Limitations on Searches

  • Scope and Manner of Searches:

    • Searches must be reasonable and proportional to the item sought.

    • For example, if searching for large stolen items like televisions, small spaces (drawers, cabinets) are off-limits.

Media Restrictions

  • Media Involvement:

    • Media members cannot accompany police on search warrant executions unless for law enforcement purposes (e.g., training documentation).


Warrantless Searches and Arrests

  • Warrant Requirement:

    • Generally, police must secure a warrant for searches under the Fourth Amendment.

    • Exceptions exist, including:

      • Exigent circumstances.

      • Stop and frisk.

      • Searches incident to lawful arrest.

      • Automobile searches.

      • Consensual searches.

      • Searches based on plain view.

      • Discovered crimes in an officer's presence.

Reasonableness of Warrantless Actions

  • Criteria for Legality:

    • Warrantless searches must be reasonable.

    • Actions based on prior behavior alone (e.g., previous drug dealing) do not justify searches without other supporting factors.

Probable Cause Hearings

  • Post-Arrest Protocol:

    • Individuals subjected to warrantless arrests are entitled to a probable cause hearing to assess the legitimacy of the arrest.

Exigent Circumstances

  • Definition & Examples:

    • Exigent circumstances allow police to act without a warrant in emergencies. Examples include:

      • Hot pursuit: Immediate action to prevent escape or harm.

      • Danger of evidence destruction: Immediate entry to preserve evidence being destroyed.

      • Threats to others: Police may act without warrants to protect lives in dangerous situations.

Legal Requirements for Hot Pursuit

  • Requirements for Hot Pursuit Justification:

    1. Probable cause that the suspect is present.

    2. Reasonable belief immediate apprehension is necessary.

    3. Pursuit begins from a lawful position.

    4. The offense must be serious (typically a felony).

    5. Pursuit must occur before or closely following apprehension.

Threats to Evidence

  • Examples of Urgency:

    • Police can intervene without a warrant if there’s reason to believe evidence (like drugs) will be destroyed.

Threats to Others

  • Police Actions to Protect Life:

    • Examples include intervening in hostage situations or responding to domestic disturbances if lives are in danger.


Technology in Law Enforcement

  • Through-Wall Radar Technology:

    • Advanced technology allowing officers to detect movement within buildings without visual contact.

    • Raises Fourth Amendment concerns regarding privacy and search without warrants.

Stop and Frisk Procedures

  • Definition and Protocol:

    • Involves detaining and patting down a suspicious individual.

    • Requires reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause.

    • Components:

      • Stop: Brief detention.

      • Frisk: Check for weapons.

Landmark Cases and Their Impact

  • Key Legal Precedents:

    • Terry v. Ohio (1968) established the basis for stop and frisk practices, determining reasonable suspicion suffices for limited searches for weapons.

    • Illinois v. Wardlow (2000): Presence in a high-crime area, combined with flight, can constitute reasonable suspicion.

robot