Today's lecture focused solely on bird examples.
Recap of previous lecture: Discussed social behavior and cooperation vs. conflict.
Natural selection operates at the gene level, not individual level.
Importance of considering costs and benefits when analyzing behaviors.
Core principle: Natural selection aims to increase reproductive success of genes.
Toy Example: Offspring demand more resources than parents are willing to provide.
Questions:
How much should offspring demand from parents?
How much should parents provide?
Intuition suggests offspring should demand infinitely; however, reality differs.
Provisioning Rates:
Let provisioning be denoted as p.
Increased resources improve offspring fitness but reduce resources available to parent.
Natural Selection's Goal:
Maximize the difference between benefit and cost.
Offspring's gene controls resource demand, affecting its fitness.
The gene's success depends on its presence in sibling offspring, with a relatedness coefficient of 0.5.
Parent's gene controls resource provision, also with a relatedness of 0.5 affecting costs and benefits.
The result is a formula: 0.5 imes ext{Benefit} - 0.5 imes ext{Cost} for both parent and offspring perspectives.
Optimal provisioning from offspring perspective is higher than from parents, indicating a conflict.
Species: Threatened bird from New Zealand.
Male and female provide resources to a single offspring.
Without resource supplementation, unlikely to produce multiple broods.
Experimental Setup:
Some parents and offspring supplemented with carotenoids.
Predictions:
Offspring with carotenoid supplementation should receive more food.
Parents supplemented should respond less to offspring's increased demand.
Result: Higher provisioning correlates with intensified begging signals from offspring.
Examining which parents should provide care in monogamous breeding systems.
Biparental Care: About 40 out of 100 studied shorebird species provide care from both parents.
Cost vs. Benefit:
Benefits of remating vs. costs of current brood quality.
Hypothesis: Higher male care predominates due to differing remating opportunities based on sex ratios.
Experimental Design:
Observation of survival rates when one parent is deserting.
Findings: Male desertion leads to significantly lower brood survival compared to female desertion.
Male survival rates lower when left unattended; shows higher associated costs.
Graph of Hatching Dates vs. Female Care reveals that females tend to provide more care late in the breeding season.
Brood Size Impact: Early in the season, larger broods receive more care; no impact in late season.
Cost of deserting increases with larger broods.
Late-season females provide more care despite brood size, indicating that benefits of desertion are perceived to be lower at that time.
Parent-offspring conflict and the varying ecological contexts can elucidate different behaviors.
Conflict resolution relies heavily on understanding relative costs and benefits.
Next Lecture Preview: Only one bird image guaranteed and more insights into patterns of behavior in animal systems.