Behavioral Ecology and Parental Investment
Introduction
Today's lecture focused solely on bird examples.
Recap of previous lecture: Discussed social behavior and cooperation vs. conflict.
Natural Selection and Genes
Natural selection operates at the gene level, not individual level.
Importance of considering costs and benefits when analyzing behaviors.
Core principle: Natural selection aims to increase reproductive success of genes.
Parent-Offspring Conflict
Toy Example: Offspring demand more resources than parents are willing to provide.
Questions:
How much should offspring demand from parents?
How much should parents provide?
Intuition suggests offspring should demand infinitely; however, reality differs.
Provisioning Rates:
Let provisioning be denoted as p.
Increased resources improve offspring fitness but reduce resources available to parent.
Natural Selection's Goal:
Maximize the difference between benefit and cost.
Genetic Perspective
Offspring's gene controls resource demand, affecting its fitness.
The gene's success depends on its presence in sibling offspring, with a relatedness coefficient of 0.5.
Parent's gene controls resource provision, also with a relatedness of 0.5 affecting costs and benefits.
The result is a formula: 0.5 imes ext{Benefit} - 0.5 imes ext{Cost} for both parent and offspring perspectives.
Graphical Representation
Optimal provisioning from offspring perspective is higher than from parents, indicating a conflict.
Case Study: Stitched Bird
Species: Threatened bird from New Zealand.
Male and female provide resources to a single offspring.
Without resource supplementation, unlikely to produce multiple broods.
Experimental Setup:
Some parents and offspring supplemented with carotenoids.
Predictions:
Offspring with carotenoid supplementation should receive more food.
Parents supplemented should respond less to offspring's increased demand.
Result: Higher provisioning correlates with intensified begging signals from offspring.
Parental Investment in Evolutionary Context
Examining which parents should provide care in monogamous breeding systems.
Biparental Care: About 40 out of 100 studied shorebird species provide care from both parents.
Cost vs. Benefit:
Benefits of remating vs. costs of current brood quality.
Hypothesis: Higher male care predominates due to differing remating opportunities based on sex ratios.
Experiment on Parental Desertion
Experimental Design:
Observation of survival rates when one parent is deserting.
Findings: Male desertion leads to significantly lower brood survival compared to female desertion.
Male survival rates lower when left unattended; shows higher associated costs.
Female Parenting Trends Through Breeding Season
Graph of Hatching Dates vs. Female Care reveals that females tend to provide more care late in the breeding season.
Brood Size Impact: Early in the season, larger broods receive more care; no impact in late season.
Cost of deserting increases with larger broods.
Late-season females provide more care despite brood size, indicating that benefits of desertion are perceived to be lower at that time.
Conclusion
Parent-offspring conflict and the varying ecological contexts can elucidate different behaviors.
Conflict resolution relies heavily on understanding relative costs and benefits.
Next Lecture Preview: Only one bird image guaranteed and more insights into patterns of behavior in animal systems.