F22
Chapter 1: The International Style: Theme and Variations (1925-65)
The Effect of Mass in Architecture
Shift from Density to Volume:
Traditional brick structures are increasingly replaced by lightweight technology.
Shift to open box designs exemplified by Le Corbusier's villas in the late 1920s.
Architectural Symbols
New Architectural Symbols:
Emergence of plane surfaces that bound volumes instead of dense masses.
The skeleton construction method dominates, creating an effect of surface and volume.
Case Study: Lovell Health House
Design and Structure:
Designed by architect Richard Neutra in 1927.
Features a skeleton steel frame clad in lightweight synthetic skin.
Emphasis on integration with the surrounding parkscape.
Homogeneity of International Style
Deceptive Uniformity:
The style appeared homogeneous but varied based on climatic and cultural needs.
Rooted in the preference for lightweight and synthetic materials.
Key Characteristics of the International Style
Modular Parts and Free Plan:
Favored standardized components to ease production and assembly.
Used skeletal frames over traditional masonry.
Page 2: Influence of Dr. Lovell and Neutra's Work
Dr. Lovell’s Role as a Progressive Architect
Emphasized physical culture and progressive education principles.
Influenced Neutra's architectural expression, focusing on the well-being of occupants.
Neutra’s Philosophy
Bio-realism Concept:
Suggested architectural forms enhance human health and nervous system functioning.
Acknowledged controversial links between design and health benefits.
Page 3: International Style Representation in Europe
International Contributions
France:
Beaudouin and Lods’ open-air school.
Le Corbusier’s rubble-walled house (1935).
Belgium and Holland Contributions
Netherlands:
Work of Brinkman and Van der Vlugt and other notable architects.
Significant Industrial Works:
Owen Williams’ Boots Pharmaceutical Plant exemplifying innovative use of materials.
Page 4: Divergence in the International Style
Expression of Highpoint 1 and 2 by Lubetkin
Highpoint 1 vs. Highpoint 2:
Distinct forms reflecting ideological shifts in modern architecture.
Highpoint 1 is more expressive, while Highpoint 2 yields to formality.
Page 5: Shift from the International Style to Domestic Architectures
Development of MARS
Methodology Influence:
The need for accessible modern architecture became essential post-war.
Challenge Against Functionalism:
Efforts to incorporate more humanistic elements into the practical architecture.
Page 6: The Role of Le Corbusier in Brazil
Influence in Brazil
Le Corbusier's Contributions (1936):
Advisory role in designing a new Ministry of Education building.
Adaptation of his principles into Brazilian architecture, notably seen in Oscar Niemeyer’s work.
Page 7: Brasilia: A Critical Analysis
Concepts of Modern Architecture
Niemeyer’s Architectural Philosophy:
Shift from functionalism to pure form and structures representing governance.
Urban Planning Dilemmas:
Brasilia’s division into administrative centers and shanty towns highlights socio-economic disparities.
Page 8: Architectural Representation in Japan
Key Developments in Japan
Antonin Raymond's Influence (1923):
Reinforced concrete design in a Western style; struggle against traditional Japanese forms.
Page 9-10: Architectural Evolution in Japan
Emergent Modernisms
Neutra’s Influence:
Yona Friedman and the conversation around urbanism in publications attempting to merge function with architecture.
Chapter 2: New Brutalism and the Architecture of the Welfare State
Post-War Cultural Climate in Britain
Government Influence:
New legislative frameworks initiated significant constructions of schools and new towns.
Emergence of Contemporary Architecture:
Shift towards less formal, more humanized designs amidst changing social needs.
Page 14: The New Brutalism in Architectural Language
Reaction Against Modernism
Smithsons’ Brutalist Ethos:
Emphasized using raw materials and exposed structures in their designs.
Page 15: Engagement with Cultural Identity
Prioritizing Social Needs
Focus on creating architectures that reflect the needs and identities of the populace rather than purely aesthetic forms.
Pages 16-31: CIAM and Team X - Ideological Shifts and Critiques
CIAM Evolution
Initial CIAM Objectives:
Focus on efficiency and production methods influences architecture.
Transition Toward Team X:
Emergence of critiques led to shifts away from CIAM’s functional categorizations towards relational philosophies.