Judicial Independence & Review: The judiciary is designed to be an independent branch, with judicial review serving as a check on other institutions.
Judicial Review: Established in Marbury v. Madison (1803), it allows courts to declare laws unconstitutional.
Foundations of Judicial Power:
Article III of the Constitution
Federalist No. 78 (argues for an independent judiciary)
Marbury v. Madison (establishes judicial review)
Life Tenure & Legitimacy Concerns: Judges serve for life, raising concerns over unchecked power.
Precedents & Stare Decisis:
Stare Decisis: Courts follow previous rulings.
Precedent: Prior case decisions shape future rulings.
Impact of Ideology on the Supreme Court: Presidential appointments can shift judicial ideology, altering precedent.
Challenges to Court Legitimacy:
President & Congress can influence decisions through:
Future judicial appointments
Legislation modifying court jurisdiction
Refusing to enforce rulings
Constitutional amendments
Judicial Activism: Courts actively interpret laws and may create new policies (e.g., Brown v. Board of Education).
Judicial Restraint: Courts defer to precedent and legislative decisions (e.g., upholding laws unless clearly unconstitutional).
Limiting Supreme Court Power:
Congress can pass new laws or amendments
The President can influence the court through appointments
Amicus Curiae Briefs: “Friend of the court” briefs filed by non-litigants to influence decisions.
Types of Opinions:
Majority Opinion: Official court ruling.
Dissenting Opinion: Disagreement with the majority.
Concurring Opinion: Agrees with the majority but for different reasons.
Writ of Certiorari: Supreme Court request to review a lower court case.
Rule of Four: At least four justices must agree to hear a case.
Court | Number of Courts | Number of Judges | Jurisdiction | Policy Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|
District Court | 94 | 1 per case | Original | Initial trial level |
Courts of Appeal | 13 | 3 per case | Appellate | Reviews lower court decisions |
Supreme Court | 1 | 9 | Both | Final arbiter of laws |
Balancing Government Power & Individual Rights: The Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights & 14th Amendment, protects civil liberties.
1st Amendment: Freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, petition.
2nd Amendment: Right to bear arms.
4th Amendment: Protection against unreasonable searches/seizures.
5th Amendment: Protection against self-incrimination & double jeopardy.
6th Amendment: Right to a fair trial.
8th Amendment: No cruel/unusual punishment.
9th Amendment: Rights not explicitly listed are retained by people.
10th Amendment: Powers not given to the federal government are reserved for states.
First Amendment Cases:
Engel v. Vitale (1962) – No school-sponsored prayer.
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) – Symbolic speech protection.
Schenck v. U.S. (1919) – Clear and Present Danger Test.
New York Times Co. v. U.S. (1971) – Prior restraint limited.
Due Process & Criminal Rights:
Mapp v. Ohio – Exclusionary rule.
Gideon v. Wainwright – Right to an attorney.
Miranda v. Arizona – Miranda rights.
Selective Incorporation Cases:
Barron v. Baltimore – Bill of Rights originally only applied to federal government.
Gitlow v. New York – Free speech applied to states.
McDonald v. Chicago – 2nd Amendment applies to states.
Right to Privacy Cases:
Roe v. Wade – Right to abortion under privacy.
Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment): Used to advance equality.
Civil Rights Cases:
Brown v. Board of Education – Overturned segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson – Established “separate but equal” (later overturned).
Bakke v. California – Limited affirmative action policies.
Social Movements & Government Response:
Civil Rights Movement (Letter from a Birmingham Jail).
Women’s Rights Movement (Title IX).
LGBTQ+ Rights Movement.
Legislative Actions:
Civil Rights Act of 1964: Banned segregation/discrimination.
Voting Rights Act of 1965: Eliminated barriers to Black voting.
Judicial Decisions:
Brown v. Board of Education – Ended segregation.
Roe v. Wade – Established abortion rights.
Some justices argue the Constitution is colorblind.
Others argue racial classifications should be allowed to promote diversity.