Exhaustion Doctrine defines that before someone can appeal an agency decision, they must exhaust all administrative remedies.
Courts do not review agency rulings until this process is complete.
The court addresses appeals only after all administrative avenues are explored.
Executive Controls: Agencies are influenced and directed by executive authority.
Legislative Controls: Congress regulates agency actions through statutes.
Judicial Controls: Courts review agency regulations and decisions based on legal standards.
Legally binding and considered a primary source of law equivalent to a statute enacted by Congress.
Non-binding guidelines that explain how agencies interpret and enforce their statutory authority.
Known as the foundational document for administrative law, akin to a 'bible' or guiding principle for agencies.
Governs the procedures that administrative agencies must follow.
Arbitrary and Capricious Standard: Courts can only overturn agency rulings if deemed arbitrary or capricious.
Fair Notice Requirement: Agencies must provide proper notice and an opportunity to affected parties to contest rules or decisions.
Rule Making: Agencies create enforceable regulations.
Enforcement: Agencies monitor compliance with their regulations through investigations.
Adjudication: Dispute resolution regarding agency rules occurs, often in administrative hearings.
Notice of Proposed Rule Making: Agencies must publish proposed rules in the Federal Register.
Comment Period: Stakeholders can provide comments on the proposed rules, which may influence the final decision.
Final Rule Publication: After comments are considered, the final rule is published, effective for compliance.
Investigations: Agencies can conduct investigations to ensure compliance with regulations.
Subpoenas: Agencies can compel testimony and document production during investigations.
Search Warrants: Agencies require warrants for searches, adhering to Fourth Amendment protections.
Initial disputes are often settled through negotiations to avoid costly litigation.
If unresolved, formal complaints can be lodged leading to hearings before Administrative Law Judges (ALJs).
ALJs are agency employees but must operate impartially under the law.
Courts often defer to agencies unless their actions are arbitrary and capricious or not in accordance with the law.
Courts historically deferred to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes unless such interpretations were unreasonable.
The recent Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo case ended the 40-year Chevron precedent, granting judges increased power to interpret laws directly.
Allows the public to request records from federal agencies, fostering transparency.
Requires that agency meetings be open to public observation with certain exceptions for private discussions, ensuring public scrutiny of agency actions.
Understanding the interplay between agencies, their rules, and the processes for challenging those rules equips individuals and entities to navigate administrative law effectively.