Sequential overview repeatedly sign-posted in slides; useful to keep the “big picture” in mind while studying.
Part 1: Utility theory → consumer choice → demand.
Part 2: Substitution & income effects.
Part 3: Production, costs & profits (short run & long run).
Part 4: Market structures with emphasis on perfect competition.
Utility (U): psychological measure of satisfaction from consuming goods/services.
Total Utility (TU)
Cumulative satisfaction from all units consumed.
Table/graph for Alison’s bottled-water example supplied (10 bottles → TU_{10}=99 utils).
Marginal Utility (MU)
Extra satisfaction from one additional unit.
Computed as MUn = TUn - TU_{n-1}.
Diminishes with quantity in the example (30 → 1 utils).
Graphical representation
TU curve rises at a decreasing rate.
MU curve slopes downward; intersects horizontal axis where TU peaks.
Formal statement: For a given time period and constant tastes, MU from successive units of a good declines as total consumption rises.
Significance
Explains downward-sloping individual demand curves.
Provides rationale for variety seeking, bulk discounts, progressive taxation, etc.
Boundary conditions
Short time frame; goods are homogeneous; ceteris paribus (income, tastes held constant).
Objective: Maximize TU subject to constraints.
Core assumptions about the consumer
Rational, complete & transitive preferences.
Knows prices; faces fixed money income.
Model often simplified to two goods: X and Y.
Allocate spending so that marginal utility per last dollar is equal across goods:
\frac{MUX}{pX}=\frac{MUY}{pY}
Rearranged: \frac{MUX}{MUY}=\frac{pX}{pY} (tangency of indifference curve & budget line in ordinal approach).
Income I=10\,; pX=1; pY=2 (initially).
Table converts MU to MU/$ (decision variable).
Sequential algorithm
Spend first dollar where MU/$ is highest (orange, 12 utils/$).
Update remaining income & next highest MU/$.
Continue until I exhausted.
Optimal bundle obtained when equality holds and budget is exactly spent.
Pedagogical payoff: shows discrete version of equi-marginal principle.
If the price of oranges falls to 1 (slide experiment):
MU schedule unchanged; MU/$ for oranges doubles → consumer reallocates toward oranges.
Observed quantities yield two price-quantity pairs → individual demand point-plot.
At p_Y=2, Q* (from earlier table) = 4 oranges.
At p_Y=1, Q* = 6 oranges.
Connecting all such pairs traces the downward-sloping demand curve.
Area under demand curve up to Q actually bought minus total expenditure.
Graphically: region between demand curve and horizontal price line.
Represents net benefit to buyers → welfare benchmark.
Price change simultaneously alters
Relative price \left(\frac{pX}{pY}\right) ⇒ Substitution Effect (SE).
Purchasing power (real income) ⇒ Income Effect (IE).
Formal definitions
SE: change in Q when relative price changes with utility held constant (Hicksian) or with real income adjusted to keep purchasing power constant (Slutsky).
IE: change in Q caused by change in real income holding relative prices constant.
Outcomes by good type
Normal good: SE & IE work same direction → always downward-sloping demand.
Inferior good: IE opposite SE; usually SE dominates, still downward-sloping.
Giffen good: Rare case where negative IE outweighs SE; demand curve upward-sloping.
Diagram (slide 23) depicts three panels illustrating decomposition.
Choice between leisure (normal good) & labor hours.
Wage ↑ ⇒ SE: labor relatively more rewarding → supply more hours.
IE: higher real income permits more leisure (less labor) if leisure normal.
Net labor-supply response ambiguous; can generate backward-bending curve.
Firm transforms inputs (L, K) into output: Q = f(L,K).
Economic Profit
\pi = TR - (\text{Explicit} + \text{Implicit Costs})
Explicit costs: observable outlays (wages, rent, materials).
Implicit costs: opportunity cost of owner’s time & capital.
Accounting profit ignores implicit costs ⇒ always ≥ economic profit.
Slide table (Ruth’s Gourmet Soup)
TR =2000, Explicit =1160 ⇒ Accounting =840.
Implicit =265 ⇒ Economic =575 (still positive).
Time horizons: at least one fixed factor in SR (usually capital).
Total Product (TP), Average Product (AP), Marginal Product (MP):
APL = \frac{TP}{L}, \quad MPL = \frac{\Delta TP}{\Delta L}
Law of Diminishing MP: beyond some point, adding variable input to fixed input lowers MP.
Graph: MP intersects AP at AP’s maximum.
TC = TFC + TVC
ATC = \frac{TC}{Q}, \; AFC = \frac{TFC}{Q}, \; AVC = \frac{TVC}{Q}
MC = \frac{\Delta TC}{\Delta Q} (equals \Delta TVC/\Delta Q).
Geometrical relationships
MC intersects AVC & ATC at minima.
ATC is vertical sum of AFC + AVC; U-shape arises from spreading TFC and diminishing returns.
Cost-curve shifts
↑ variable-factor price ⇒ upward shift of AVC, ATC, MC.
↑ fixed-factor price shifts ATC & AFC but not MC.
All inputs variable; firms choose cost-minimizing input mix.
Cost-minimization condition
\frac{MPK}{pK}=\frac{MPL}{pL} \quad\text{or}\quad \frac{MPK}{MPL}=\frac{pK}{pL}
Principle of Substitution: when relative input prices change, firms substitute toward cheaper input.
LRAC Curve
“Saucer” shape: economies of scale (EOS) ↓ section, minimum efficient scale at Q_M, diseconomies ↑ section.
Return to Scale linkage
IRS ⇒ EOS; CRS ⇒ constant LRAC; DRS ⇒ diseconomies.
Relation to SRATC
LRAC is lower envelope of SRATC family; no SR curve can dip below it.
Perfect Competition ← Monopolistic Comp. ← Oligopoly ← Monopoly.
Market Power: ability to influence market price; zero in perfect competition.
Many firms, identical product, price-taking, perfect information, free entry/exit.
Firm’s demand is perfectly elastic (horizontal) at market price p.
TR=pQ
AR=\frac{TR}{Q}=p
MR = \frac{\Delta TR}{\Delta Q}=p (constant).
Produce or Shut Down?
If p < \min AVC ⇒ shut down, loss =TFC.
If p \ge \min AVC ⇒ produce where p=MC.
Profit-Maximizing Output
Condition: p=MC (also =MR).
Supply curve = MC above AVC.
Industry SR supply = horizontal sum of individual MC segments.
Short-run equilibrium can involve profits, breakeven, or losses (≠ shutdown) depending on price relative to ATC.
Free entry if p>\min ATC; exit if p<\min ATC.
Long-run equilibrium requirements
p=MC (profit maximization).
p=\min ATC (zero economic profit; break-even).
Firm operates at minimum LRAC (productive efficiency).
Allocative Efficiency: MC = MV (marginal value) ensured because p=MC and consumers’ p reflects MV.
Productive Efficiency: Long-run PC drives firms to least-cost technology.
Dynamic aspect: super-normal profits attract entry, fostering innovation (creative destruction); price signals reallocate resources.
Accounting profit: \pi_A = TR - \text{Explicit}.
Economic profit: \pi_E = TR - (\text{Explicit}+\text{Implicit}).
Marginal Cost: MC = \frac{\Delta TC}{\Delta Q}.
Marginal Product: MP = \frac{\Delta TP}{\Delta L} (if labor varied).
Marginal Revenue (PC firm): MR=p.
Marginal Utility rule: \frac{MUX}{pX}=\frac{MUY}{pY}.
Profit-maximization (PC): p=MC.
Shut-down criterion: p<\min AVC.
DMU underlies rational drug dosage, progressive taxes, and diminishing joy in material accumulation.
Perfect competition serves as normative benchmark for antitrust & regulatory policy.
Recognition of implicit costs crucial for realistic entrepreneurial decision making.
Creative destruction emphasizes ethical trade-off between short-run job losses and long-run growth.
Textbook: Chapter 6 (utility & demand), 7.1–7.4 (costs), 8–9 (perfect competition), 12.1.
Supplementary videos linked in slides for visual learners (MU graphs, production functions, SR decision rules).
These bullet-point notes capture all definitions, laws, numerical examples, formulas, and conceptual linkages presented across the 81-slide transcript. They are structured to serve as a standalone study guide for exam preparation.