Title: Indirect Effects of Large Herbivores on Snakes in an African Savanna
Authors: Douglas J. McCauley, Felicia Keesing, Truman P. Young, Brian F. Allan, Robert M. Pringle
Published in: Ecology, 87(10), 2006, pp. 2657–2663
Objective: To investigate how the removal of large herbivores influences the abundance of olive hissing snakes (Psammophis mossambicus) in savanna ecosystems.
The removal of large herbivorous mammals leads to an increase in small mammal density, which subsequently affects predator populations.
Snakes were more abundant in areas devoid of large herbivores due to higher rodent populations, not due to differences in predation pressure on snakes.
This study represents the first empirical evidence of indirect effects of large herbivores on snake populations in African savannas.
Dominant and Keystone Species: Have significant impacts on community structure and dynamics. Their interactions can lead to direct and indirect effects.
Indirect Effects: Occur when changes in one species affect a second species through one or more intermediary variables.
Other studies on indirect pathways often focus on trophic cascades, where predator changes impact prey populations multiple levels down the food web.
Habitat: Eco-initiatives are critical in areas experiencing declines in large herbivores due to factors like poaching and habitat destruction.
Specific focus on Psammophis mossambicus, a prevalent predator of small mammals in the region.
Snakes benefit from increased prey (rodents) when large herbivores are removed, resulting in higher snake abundance in areas without large herbivores.
The research aims to measure snake populations and understand the mechanisms driving changes in abundance.
Conducted at Mpala Research Centre, Laikipia District, Kenya (geographical location: 0°82'N, 36°83' E).
Eco-system features include Acacia drepanolobium savanna and varying rainfall patterns impacting vegetation and animal populations.
Consists of plots that exclude large herbivores and control plots with unrestricted animal access.
Snake Surveys: Monitored using cover boards and standard measures to track snake sightings and individual captures over various sessions.
Small Mammal Sampling: Implemented trapping sessions, noting rodent densities, particularly for Saccostomus mearnsi.
Vegetation Analysis: Measured understory cover to gauge habitat availability for snakes. No significant differences were noted between plots.
Raptor Surveys: Evaluated potential predation impacts by monitoring raptor populations in both study plot types.
Snake Abundance: Plots without large herbivores reported nearly double the snake sightings and individuals
Rodent Density: Higher in areas devoid of large herbivores during both study years correlated with increased snake populations.
Vegetation Cover: No significant differences in cover were observed between plots with and without large herbivores, suggesting potential factors influencing snake populations were not due to habitat quality alone.
Raptors: No significant differences in the presence or activity of snake predators were observed between different plots, negating predation pressure as the primary factor for snake abundance variance.
Mechanisms Considered: Three primary mechanisms discussed concerning increased snake populations:
Reduction in trampling by large herbivores.
Predation pressure differences.
Increased prey availability (rodents) leading to higher snake densities.
Indications suggest that heightened rodent populations are the significant factor driving increases in snake density.
Removal of large herbivores could enhance prey availability, illustrating an indirect impact on predator populations (snakes) through trophic cascades.
The findings contribute to a broader understanding of ecosystem dynamics and the role of large herbivores within savanna food webs.
Thanked various Kenyan authorities, research centers, and individuals whose support was instrumental for this study.