A contract is a promissory agreement recognized and enforced by law.
It involves a bargained-for exchange.
American contract law serves as an economic tool to facilitate exchanges.
Governed by state law—with preference to the selected law by the parties.
Good faith is essential in transactions.
Comity applies in international contracts that respect foreign laws.
Promise, Offer, and Acceptance: Clear agreement between parties.
Meeting of Minds: Common understanding and intent are crucial.
Good Faith: Parties must act honestly.
Consideration: Legal detriment or benefit involved in the exchange.
Agreements must indicate a mutual intention to contract.
Reference to the Lucy v. Zehmer case on mutual assent and reasonable interpretation of actions.
Consideration must be adequate, as demonstrated in Hamer v. Sidway.
Use of Parole Evidence Rule to restrict conflicting extrinsic evidence.
A court may examine surrounding circumstances if ambiguity exists (illustrated by Raffles v. Wichelhaus).
Wood v. Lucy emphasizes the implied duty of reasonable effort in contract execution.
Restitution addresses unjust enrichment outside of traditional contract contexts.
Quasi Contracts are imposed by law in absence of agreement, creating obligations to prevent unjust enrichment.
Promissory Estoppel: Enforces definite promises when reliance occurs.
Requires clarity, reliance, and resulting injury.
Quantum Meruit: Compensation for services under an implied contract, ensuring no unjust enrichment.
Expectation Damages: Restore non-breaching party to the position they would have occupied.
Reliance Damages: Compensate for losses incurred based on reliance on the contract.
Restitution Damages: Address unjust enrichment of the breaching party.
Courts favor equitable remedies like specific performance in unique cases.
Statutory and economic damages are underpinned by contract terms.
Courts may impose specific performance when monetary compensation is inadequate.
The UCC standardizes commercial law across states, enhancing the clarity of business transactions.
Governs all commercial transactions, including sales and leases.
Facilitates contracts between merchants under Article 2.
Mandates certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable (e.g., land transfers, goods over $500).
Impossibility: Duty becomes impossible to fulfill.
Frustration of Purpose: Unexpected events derail the contract's core objective.
Impracticability: Duty becomes excessively costly or difficult.
Courts may declare contracts void under unforeseeable circumstances, as evidenced in JN Contemporary Art LLC v. Phillips Auctioneers LLC regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.
Situations with merely increased costs (e.g., Suez Canal route change) do not constitute impracticability.
Contract interpretation is a crucial aspect of contract law, where courts seek to ascertain the intent of the parties involved. The Parole Evidence Rule restricts the use of extrinsic evidence that contradicts or modifies the written terms of the contract. However, if ambiguity exists within the contract, courts may consider surrounding circumstances and extrinsic evidence to clarify the parties' intentions, as illustrated in the case of Raffles v. Wichelhaus. This ensures that contracts are understood and enforced according to the parties' genuine agreements rather than rigidly adhering to potentially ambiguous language.
Restitution is a legal principle that addresses situations of unjust enrichment, ensuring that a party does not retain a benefit at another's expense without a legal justification. In the absence of a formal agreement, courts may impose quasi contracts to create obligations that prevent such injustice. Additionally, the doctrines of Promissory Estoppel and Quantum Meruit come into play, where Promissory Estoppel enforces clear and definite promises when a party has relied on them to their detriment, while Quantum Meruit mandates compensation for services rendered under an implied contract, thereby safeguarding against unjust enrichment.