Interference: A cause of forgetting in long-term memory.
Introduced through tasks involving learning word pairs.
Example of a participant learning pairs such as "dog" to "chair."
Proactive Interference: Occurs when older information disrupts the recall of newer information.
Cue Overload: When the same cue is associated with multiple targets (e.g., "dog" linked to both "chair" and "sofa"), it complicates recall.
Can illustrate that the retention of older information can interfere with new learning.
Retroactive Interference: New information interrupts the recall of previously learned information.
For instance, learning a new list where previously learned pairs compete with new pairs in memory.
Participants learn one list of word pairs followed by another. Success in recalling associations diminishes with similarities in lists.
Importance of the similarity of material on recall performance (50% for closely associated lists vs 90% for no interference).
Experiments demonstrate improvements in recall by using completely different cues or targets in a second learning task, reducing proactive interference.
Results show that similarity significantly affects retention and recall rates.
Retention rate is influenced by how deeply information is learned (e.g., reiterating pairs multiple times).
Kepplin and Underwood's Study: Found increasing repetitions helped reduce proactive interference when tested on different lists.
Networks are often constructed to demonstrate connection strength between concepts.
Concepts are represented by nodes, connected through various types of links (e.g., property links and ISA links), showcasing hierarchical organization.
Spreading Activation: When thinking about a concept, activation spreads to related concepts.
Example: When thinking of "fire," related concepts like "fire engine" become activated, speeding up retrieval of those concepts.
Recall vs. Recognition Tests: Different cognitive processes involved in retrieving information.
Free Recall: Requires generating responses based on memory.
Cued Recall: Involves hints or cues that identify memory candidates.
Recognition Test: Participants match responses from prompts, often easier than recall.
Memory quality can be influenced by schemas, expectations, and prior experiences when reconstructing memories.
Errors stem from fitting memories into existing mental frameworks, affecting retrieval accuracy.
Evidence shows people can have robust memories even decades later (e.g., 90% recall for high school classmates).
Suggests longevity of memory may be linked to deeply encoded information.
Contextual Cues: The environment during encoding can influence recall performance during retrieval.
People often remember better when tested in the same context in which they learned the material.
Experiment highlighting learning underwater vs. on land shows significant performance differences based on context during retrieval.
Mood can serve as an internal context for memory encoding and retrieval.
Mood-Induction: Emotional states during encoding influence retrieval success. Testing in the same emotional state leads to better recall.
Transfer Appropriate Processing: The effectiveness of memory retrieval is influenced by the similarity in processing between encoding and retrieval.
Semantic encoding yields better memory, especially when retrieval matches the original encoding context.
Testing Effect: Self-testing yields better retention than repeated studying through passive review of material.
Overlearning: Continuing to study material even after initial mastery to strengthen memory retention.
Spaced Practice: Studying over spaced intervals rather than cramming leads to better long-term retention.