MW

Exam Review Notes

Water Potential

  • Net flow direction is determined by water potential.
  • Dimensional analysis from chemistry is applicable: same units on top and bottom cancel out.
  • If units work out, the setup is likely correct.
  • Example:
    • Solute potential of sugar water: -0.15 \times 10 = -1.5 bars
    • Water potential equals solute potential (no pressure potential).
    • If cell and beaker have the same water potential, there is zero net flow.
    • Zero net flow does not mean no movement, but equal movement in both directions.

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

  • Two major equations:
    • p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1
    • p + q = 1
  • p and q represent alleles; p^2, 2pq, and q^2 represent genotypes.
  • p = frequency of the dominant allele.
  • q = frequency of the recessive allele.
  • p^2 = percentage of homozygous dominant genotype (e.g., big A big A).
  • q^2 = percentage of homozygous recessive genotype (e.g., little a little a).
  • 2pq = percentage of heterozygous genotype (e.g., big A little A).
  • Example Problem:
    • Population of biology instructors: 396 red-sided, 557 tan-sided.
    • Red is totally recessive.
    • Calculate allele frequencies:
      • q^2 = percentage of recessive individuals = 396 / (396 + 557) = 396 / 953 = 0.42
      • q = \sqrt{0.42} = 0.64
      • p = 1 - q = 1 - 0.64 = 0.36
    • Expected genotype frequencies:
      • Big A Big A (p^2) = (0.36)^2 = 0.1296 \approx 0.13
      • Big A Little a (2pq) = 2 \times 0.36 \times 0.64 = 0.4608 \approx 0.45
      • Little a Little a (q^2) = 0.42
    • Number of heterozygous individuals:
      • Frequency of heterozygotes (0.45) multiplied by the total population (953) = 0.45 \times 953
    • Expected phenotype frequencies:
      • Tan: heterozygous and homozygous dominant.
      • Red: homozygous recessive.
  • Hardy-Weinberg Conditions:
    • Population not evolving.
    • No natural selection.
    • Random mating.
    • No gene flow.
    • No genetic drift.
    • Allele frequencies remain constant.
  • If Hardy-Weinberg conditions are met, allele frequencies remain the same.
    • New population size: 1,245
    • Number of red-sided individuals: 0.42 \times 1245

Simpson's Diversity Index

  • Measure of community diversity.
  • Community: group of different species living in the same area.
  • Equation: D = 1 - \sum (n/N)^2
    • D = Simpson's diversity index.
    • n = number of organisms of a particular species.
    • N = total number of organisms of all species in the community.
  • Example:
    • Calculate Community 1:
      • Species A: 5 individuals
      • Species B: 5 individuals
      • Species C: 5 individuals
      • Total individuals: 20
      • \sum (n/N)^2 = (5/20)^2 + (5/20)^2 + (5/20)^2 = 0.25
      • D = 1 - 0.25 = 0.75
  • Key Points:
    • Calculate Community 2 result: 0.35
    • Higher diversity index = healthier ecosystem = more resilient community.
    • Major difference: even distribution of species in healthier communities.

Surface Area to Volume Ratio

  • Larger surface area to volume ratio = healthier cell.
  • Larger ratios found in smaller cells.
  • Cube A: 12:1 ratio (healthiest).
  • Cube B: 6:1 ratio.
  • Cube C: 3:1 ratio.
  • Cube D: 1.5:1 ratio.
  • Larger surface area allows efficient export of waste and import of nutrients, oxygen, etc.

Cellular Respiration

  • Main purpose: create ATP (mitochondria = powerhouse of the cell).
  • ATP produced at each stage.
  • 80-90% of ATP made during oxidative phosphorylation via the electron transport chain (ETC).
  • Glycolysis and Krebs cycle produce ATP through substrate-level phosphorylation.
  • Glycolysis: breakdown of glucose into pyruvate.
  • Pyruvate enters mitochondria and becomes acetyl CoA.
  • Each glucose molecule yields two acetyl CoA molecules; Krebs cycle runs twice per glucose.
  • High-energy electrons carried by NADH and FADH2 to the ETC to power ATP production.

Heredity & Pedigrees

  • Refer to Unit 3 Day 3 for pedigree analysis.
  • Videos available explaining different types of pedigrees (autosomal vs. sex-linked, dominant vs. recessive).