Focuses on the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of mental disorders, including emotional and behavioral issues.
Understanding Mental Disorders: Helps to identify causes and characteristics of mental disorders.
Development of Treatments: Aids in the creation and evaluation of effective interventions.
Informs Prevention Strategies: Contributes to strategies aimed at improving mental health outcomes.
Psychologists must determine client progress and effectiveness of treatments.
Identify clients at risk and the severity of their disorders.
Essential for making a case to healthcare administrators and policymakers regarding the cost-effectiveness of psychological services.Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Emphasizes scientific methods and research in clinical practice.
Clinicians are expected to:
Use scientific methodology for decision-making.
Employ scientifically valid methods and techniques with clients.
Educate clients on scientifically-based findings.
Engage in practice-based research.Source: O’Connor et al (2014)
Treatment Outcomes
Assessment Methods
Diagnostic Issues
Professional Issues
Teaching and Training Issues
Service Evaluation
Aims to measure:
Efficacy: Success in controlled studies with specific client criteria.
Effectiveness: Success in real clinical settings where clients may not fit specific criteria.
Considerations of internal versus external validity. Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Evaluates and seeks to improve the tools clinical psychologists use:
Development and validation of new assessment instruments.
Establishing normative data for the baseline of specific populations.
Comparing various assessment tools.Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Explores validity and reliability of diagnostic constructs, relationships between disorders, and prevalence/course of disorders. Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Examines clinical psychologists' beliefs, activities, and practices:
Example: Survey assessing how psychologists discuss ethnic and racial differences with clients, revealing varying degrees of consistency in these conversations. Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Focuses on educating future professionals, including training philosophies and outcomes. Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Investigates the usefulness and necessity of psychological services and their impacts.Source: Castle (2007)
In-depth exploration of clients' experiences regarding assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and broader life experiences related to their disorders, including stigma.
Emphasizes patient and public involvement in research.
Researchers manipulate one variable to observe effects on another.
Independent Variable: Manipulated variable.
Dependent Variable: Variable expected to change.
Types:
quasi-experimental:
Similar to an experiment but does not randomly assign people to groups. Used when random assignment isn’t possible (e.g., studying the effects of a program in different schools).
between-group:
Compares different groups of people. For example, one group gets a new teaching method, another group gets the old method, and their results are compared.
within-group:
Tests the same group of people at different times. For example, measuring students’ performance before and after using a new study technique.
mixed-group designs:
Combines both approaches. It compares different groups while also tracking changes within each group over time.
Participants are randomly assigned to experimental or control groups.
The only expected difference is the outcome variable.
Double Blind RCT: Considered the "Gold Standard".
Challenges include accounting for individual differences and the complexity of mental disorders.Source: Shean, 2014
Examines relationships between variables without manipulation.
Advantages: Feasibility.
Disadvantages: Cannot establish causality.Source: Sockol (2021)
A detailed examination of a specific individual, group, or situation.
Valued for the idiographic approach, highlighting unique characteristics.
Advantages: Offers depth of information and insights on rare cases.
Disadvantages: Potential for bias, confounding variables, and poor external validity.Source: Sockol (2021)
Combines results from separate studies to create an overall effect size. Source: Pomerantz (2011)
Various research methods can enhance clinical practice, stressing awareness of study design strengths and limitations.
The scientist-practitioner model aims to bridge the gap between research and practice, though further efforts are needed for realization.
Incorporates best available evidence, patient preferences, and clinical experience to inform evidence-based practice.