key information:
company - barrow plc.
objective - improve cash management strategy
annual cash requirement [to pay obligations] - £15,000,000
fixed transaction cost per cash raise - £700
opportunity cost of holding cash - 10% per annum
preferred buffer cash balance - £10,000
daily variance of cash balance - £9,000,000
formula sheet:
the Baumol model is similar to the economic order quantity [EOQ] model but applied to cash management. it helps determine how much cash a company should withdraw at a time to minimise transaction and opportunity costs
given data:
total cash requirement per yr [T] = 15,000,000
fixed cost per transaction [F] = 700
opportunity cost per rate [R] = 10%
formula for optimal order quantity [i.e. the amount of cash withdrawn each time]:
substituting the given values:
this means barrow plc. should withdraw £458,257.57 each time they need cash
since cash is withdrawn in fixed amounts and spent over time, the average cash balance is simply:
so, the company will, on average, hold £229,128.78 in cash
the no. of times the company needs to withdraw cash annually is:
this means barrow plc. will need to withdraw cash about 33 times a yr
total trading costs:
= fixed cost per transaction x no. of transactions
= 700 × 32.73 = 22,912.88
total opportunity costs:
= average cash balance x opportunity cost rate
= 229,128.78 × 0.10 = 22,912.88
total cost:
= trading costs + opportunity costs
= 22,912.88 + 22,912.88 = 45,825.76
so, the total cost of managing cash using the baumol model is £45,825.76 per yr
the miller-orr model is useful when cash inflows and outflows are uncertain. it sets upper and lower limits for cash balances and determines a target balance
given data:
lower limit [L] = 10,000
fixed cost per transaction [F] = 700
opportunity cost rate [R] = 10%
variance of daily cash flows = 9,000,000
so, standard deviation of daily cash flows:
constant K for miller-orr formula:
[1 + K]^365 = 1 + R
as R = 10%, when rearranged, K = 0.000261
the miller-orr target cash balance formula:
substituting the values:
so the target cash balance is £36,257.23
the upper limit is given by:
the miller-orr average cash balance is:
the spread in the miller-orr model is the difference between the upper limit and the lower limit, which is:
if the opportunity cost of holding cash decreases to 7%, it impacts both models:
new target cash balance:
strengths
simply to apply and understand, making it easy for financial managers
helps minimise transaction and opportunity costs by determining an optimal cash withdrawal amount
suitable for firms with predictable and steady cash flows
limitations
assumes constant cash outflows, which is unrealistic for a business with fluctuating cash needs
requires regular and schedules withdrawals, which may not be practical for barrow plc.
doesn’t account for uncertainty in cash flows, making it less useful in volatile environments
applicability to barrow plc:
since barrow plc. likely has uncertain cash needs, the baumol model may not be the most effective choice
it works well for planned cash management but lacks flexibility in real-world conditions
strengths
designed to handle uncertain cash flows, making it more realistic for barrow plc.
establishes upper and lower cash limits, allowing automatic decisions on cash transfers
reduces unnecessary cash holdings while keeping a buffer for unexpected expenses
helps balance transaction costs with the opportunity cost of holding excess cash
limitations
more complex than the baumol model, requiring estimates of variance in cash flows
requires constant monitoring to ensure cash stays within limits
assumes a normal distribution of cash movements, which may not always be accurate
applicability to barrow plc:
since barrows plc’s cash balance varies daily [variance = £9 mil.], the miller orr model is more suitable
it allows barrow plc to adjust its cash balance dynamically based on inflows and outflows
miller orr model is the better choice for barrow plc. due to its adaptability to fluctuating cash flows
the baumol model may still be useful for forecasting and basic cash planning but lacks the flexibility required for real world conditions
a combined approach [using baumol model for planning and miller ott for daily management] may be an effective strategy