Diagnosing Psychological Disorders
Diagnostic classification
Assignment to categories based on shared attributes or relations
Classification is central to all sciences
Idiographic strategy: what is unique about an individual’s personality, cultural background, or circumstances
Nomothetic strategy: often used when identifying a specific psychological disorder, to make a diagnosis
Terminology of classification systems
Taxonomy: classification in a scientific context
Nosology: taxonomy in psychological/medical phenomena
Nomenclature: labels in a nosological
Categorical and dimensional approaches
Classical (or pure) categorical approach: strict categories
Dimensional approach: classification along dimensions
Prototypical approach: combines classical and dimensional views
Widely used classification systems
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Updated every 10-20 years
ICD-10
International Classification of Diseases
Published by the World Health Organization
Prior to 1980, diagnoses were made based on biological or psychoanalytic theory
Introduction of DSM-III in 1980 revolutionized classification
Classification now relied on specific lists of symptoms, improving reliability and validity
Diagnoses classified along five “Axes” describing types of problems
DSM-IV introduced in 1994
Eliminated previous distinction between psychological vs organic mental disorders
Reflected appreciation that all disorders are influenced by both psychological and biological factors
DSM-IV-TR (“text revision” of DSM-IV) incorporated new research and slightly altered criteria accordingly
Basic characteristics
Removed axial system
Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for disorders
Disorders are categorized under broad headings
Empirically-grounded, prototypic approach to classification
Adding new diagnoses: new disorder labels are created when groups of individuals are identified whose symptoms are not adequately explained by existing labels
The problem of comorbidity
Comorbidity: 2 or more disorders for the same person
High comorbidity is extremely common
Emphasizes reliability, maybe at the expense of validity
Dimensional classification
DSM was intended to move toward a more dimensional approach, but critics say it doesn’t improve much from DSM-V
Labeling issues and stigmatization
Some labels have negative connotations and may make patients less likely to seek treatment
Diagnostic classification
Assignment to categories based on shared attributes or relations
Classification is central to all sciences
Idiographic strategy: what is unique about an individual’s personality, cultural background, or circumstances
Nomothetic strategy: often used when identifying a specific psychological disorder, to make a diagnosis
Terminology of classification systems
Taxonomy: classification in a scientific context
Nosology: taxonomy in psychological/medical phenomena
Nomenclature: labels in a nosological
Categorical and dimensional approaches
Classical (or pure) categorical approach: strict categories
Dimensional approach: classification along dimensions
Prototypical approach: combines classical and dimensional views
Widely used classification systems
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Updated every 10-20 years
ICD-10
International Classification of Diseases
Published by the World Health Organization
Prior to 1980, diagnoses were made based on biological or psychoanalytic theory
Introduction of DSM-III in 1980 revolutionized classification
Classification now relied on specific lists of symptoms, improving reliability and validity
Diagnoses classified along five “Axes” describing types of problems
DSM-IV introduced in 1994
Eliminated previous distinction between psychological vs organic mental disorders
Reflected appreciation that all disorders are influenced by both psychological and biological factors
DSM-IV-TR (“text revision” of DSM-IV) incorporated new research and slightly altered criteria accordingly
Basic characteristics
Removed axial system
Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for disorders
Disorders are categorized under broad headings
Empirically-grounded, prototypic approach to classification
Adding new diagnoses: new disorder labels are created when groups of individuals are identified whose symptoms are not adequately explained by existing labels
The problem of comorbidity
Comorbidity: 2 or more disorders for the same person
High comorbidity is extremely common
Emphasizes reliability, maybe at the expense of validity
Dimensional classification
DSM was intended to move toward a more dimensional approach, but critics say it doesn’t improve much from DSM-V
Labeling issues and stigmatization
Some labels have negative connotations and may make patients less likely to seek treatment