Social Psychology Notes:
1/28
Social Psychology
Is the study of the feelings, thoughts, and behaviors of individuals in a social context
Involves affect (feelings), cognition (thoughts), and behavior
Doesn’t refer to immediate social context
Themes of Social Psychology
The power of the situation
How individuals are influenced by their interpretation of social situations
Predicting behavior is a function of the person and the situation
Connections with Social Psychology
Social psychology is a “hub” discipline that connects both within and outside of psychology
We can address questions that involve contrasting perspectives such as personality, clinical, and sociological perspectives
1/30
900162
Problems with looking to experts:
People lie
People are often wrong and overconfident
Problems with figuring it out yourself:
Our perspective is limited
We fall victim to confirmation bias
We might alter the phenomenon by observing it
The Theory-Hypothesis-Research Cycle:
Question: What brings people together in romantic relationships
Theory: An explanation for how and why variables are related to each other
Hypothesis: A specific prediction that derives from the theory
Research: A process of making observations to test hypotheses
↳ data support or fail to support hypotheses NOT prove or disprove
Unethical Research Examples:
Stanford Prison Experiment
Little Albert
Milgram Shocking
Ethical Concerns:
Harm to participants→ mental and physical
Deception (lying)
Harms are balanced with benefit
Unit 2: The Methods of Social Psychology
Questions to answer
Is there a regional culture of honor in which people are more accepting of crimes that were committed to defend one’s honor
What are the benefits of conducting a longitudinal study spanning decades
A study took place to see if jobs were more open to hiring those who committed manslaughter as direct result to their honor being threatened
↳ fictional man hit other man with pipe as a consequence of him saying his partner slept with him and the man who died started the assault first
Businesses in the south were more open to hiring this individual
Hindsight Bias→ the tendency to believe after learning the outcome
Makes us believe that we knew the answer beforehand
Question: Which of the following is true about the relationship between social psychology and our intuitions about human behavior?
Answer: Social psychological research can contradict our intuitions because we are not always consciously aware of the causes of our behavior.
Question: Zied was told that people tend to like things that are more familiar to them, as compared with things that are more novel. If Zied were exhibiting the hindsight bias, which of the following would be his response if he were then asked if he could have predicted this?
Answer: “I knew that people like familiar things more than novel things.”
Thought Experiment→ An experiment that can be described, but not actually performed
Familiarity breeds liking
When reminded of the inevitability of death, individuals look towards the values they hold dear
↳religion and patriotism towards their country
Hypothesis→ prediction about what will happen under certain conditions
Tested by studies which examine predictions about what will happen in a certain setting→ artificial set up
EX: When people work hard to get something and it turns out to be disappointing, they will be motivated to find hidden benefits
This example is supported by dissonance theory→ when two thoughts are inconsistent with one another, the individual will do substantial mental work to achieve cognitive consistency
Theory→ explanation for a phenomenon
Theories lead to a greater understanding of natural phenomena
Are supported by empirical data
EX: Bacterial adaptation to drugs is understood in terms of evolutionary theory
Observational Research:
Charles Darwin was the first to exhibit observational research when he went to the galapagos and observed the naturally occurring genetic patterns of finches
↳ this led to his theory of evolution by natural selection
Participant Observation→ involves observing phenomena at close range
↳ an anthropologist living with a group of people for a long time to note what they do and come up with guesses and explanations
Observational Research Methods:
Archival research→ looking at evidence found in archives and databases to form theories etc
Surveys→ asking people questions using interviews or questionnaires
↳ can use a variety of sample sizes
typically random in order to prevent bias
Convenience sampling is not random and does not effectively extinguish bias from the data set making it unreliable
Correlational Research→ measuring two variables to see if there is a relationship between them
Can look into the strength of the relationship between two variables
Are an experimenters best option when a study could be deemed too unethical to pursue
Correlation is not causation
Experimental Research→ enables researchers to make inferences about why there is a relationship between two variables
Self Selection→ when an investigator has no control over any particular participant's level (EX: IQ, test score, etc.)
Longitudinal Studies→ involves collecting measures at different points in time from the same participants
↳EX: investigator collects how many hours a teen plays video games each week, then once that teen reaches adulthood measure amount of criminal behavior that they participate in
Natural Experiment→ events occur that the experimenter believes will have causal implications for some outcome
Criteria for Sound Research
External Validity→ indication of how well the results of a study pertain to conditions outside of the laboratory
↳ When you are unable to generalize the results to real-life situations, you have poor external validity
One of the best ways to ensure external validity is to conduct field experiments
Field Study→ an experiment that involves collecting data outside of the laboratory usually with participants who are unaware of their role in a study
Internal Validity→ refers to the likelihood that only the manipulated variable produced the results found in the experiment
↳An experiment lacks internal validity when there is another variable that is unaccounted for could have caused the results found in the experiment
Requires for the experimental set up to be realistic, so the participants don’t second guess the scenarios realisticness
Reliability→ the degree to which a measure gives consistent results on repeated occasions or the degree to which two measuring instruments yield the same or similar results
The degree of consistency when something is measured more than once
↳test-retest reliability→ do you get the same results when you take an IQ test twice
↳interrater reliability→ do two observers agree in how they rate the charisma of a world leader or the kindness of a classmate?
Ability tests are expected to have a retest correlation of .8 or higher
Interrater reliability is expected to have a correlation of .5 or higher
Measurement Validity→ correlation between the outcome and the outcome the measure is supposed to predict
The accuracy of which something is measured
↳EX: IQ test validity is measured by finding the correlation between grades in school/performance in jobs and the IQ test score
Statistical Significance→ measure of the probability that an outcome occurred by chance alone
↳a finding achieves statistical significance when the probability of finding by that chance is less than 1 in 20 or .05
Determined by:
The size of the difference between results obtained from participants in the experimental condition and the control condition of an experiment/ the strength of the relationship between the variables in a correlational study
The number of cases in which the finding is based
↳ the larger the difference or strength of the relationship and the number of cases, the greater the statistical significance
Replication→ involves the reproduction of research results by the original researcher or a replicator
↳some results do not replicate, therefore they are not valid
Open Science→ ensures that the scientific research is sound and the reported results are likely to be replicated
Institutional Review Board→ a committee that examines research proposals and makes judgements about their ethical appropriateness
↳An IRB includes at least one scientist, one non scientist, and one person who is not affiliated with the institution
Deception Research→ when researchers intentionally mislead participants about the purpose or procedures of a study
↳ raises ethical concerns
Basic Science→ the study of how the world works
↳ want to find out the phenomena in its own right rather than using another finding to solve the real world problem
1 part
Can give rise to theories that can lead to interventions or efforts to change certain behaviors
Applied Science→ applying other scientific methods/findings in order to solve a problem or answer a question
2 parts