Sustainable Design Initiatives & Zoning Practices: Identify initiatives and practices in urban geography.
Responses to Urban Design Initiatives: Explain the positive and negative responses.
Criteria for a Livable City: Beauty (natural & human-made), clean air & water, public transit, safety from crime, historical significance, accessibility, affordability.
Urban design aims to make cities livable, considering human and environmental impacts.
Compact, walkable cities reduce dependence on cars, lowering pollution and congestion.
Key approaches include smart growth policies, New Urbanism, greenbelt development, and slow-growth cities.
Address regional sprawl through:
Mixed Land Use: Combines residential, business, and entertainment for a vibrant neighborhood.
Compact Design: Efficient land use through vertical growth rather than horizontal sprawl.
Infill Development: Utilizing unused lands within existing areas.
Walkable Neighborhoods: Promotes pedestrian-friendly design.
Transportation Variety: Ensures high-quality public transport and safe biking/walking infrastructure.
Diverse Housing: Offers housing for all life stages and income levels.
Environmental Preservation: Protects natural areas for recreation and limits sprawl.
Focus on dense settlements with attractive architecture within pedestrian reach of amenities.
Advocates principles aligning with smart growth, including:
Walkability: Amenities within a 10-minute walk.
Connectivity: Interconnected streets facilitating ease of movement.
Mixed Use/Diversity: Mixed-use neighborhoods and varied housing types.
Quality Design: Emphasizes beauty and community identity.
Traditional Structure: Neighborhood centers with parks and high-density edges.
Smart Transportation: Enhances connections to public transport.
Sustainability: Focuses on energy efficiency and reduced dependence on cars.
Essential for maintaining ecological health and urban beauty.
Benefits:
Reduces sprawl by restricting building in greenbelt areas.
Provides recreational spaces and connects urban residents to nature.
Economic advantages through local agriculture and tourism opportunities.
Global Examples: London's greenbelt, U.S. states (Oregon, Washington, Tennessee), Canadian cities (Ottawa, Toronto), and Australian cities.
Update local zoning laws to manage urban growth effectively.
Example: Issaquah, Washington took measures to control development and enhance community aesthetics.
Focus on balancing development with community needs and resource limitations.
Enhanced local amenities and quality of life in cities like Portland, Southern Village, and Seaside.
Contributes to public health through cleaner air, reduced accidents, and increased physical activity.
Reduced pollution and land preservation are praised by environmentalists and farming communities.
Economic incentives for developers and government support improve development relationships.
Concerns about decreasing property values due to increased density and crime.
Fear of reduced affordable housing availability with mixed-use developments.
Complaints from homeowners about restrictions on property use due to pedestrian-oriented designs.
Potential disruption and displacement of existing communities due to high-density developments.
Concerns about increased segregation and the potential destruction of historical sites.
Some argue that smart growth fails to mitigate sprawl, leading to urban issues.
This module covers urban design initiatives like smart growth, New Urbanism, greenbelt development, and slow-growth cities, highlighting their pros and cons as we prepare for further studies in urban geography.