Firms often report different amounts of income vs. cash flow for a given year.
This disparity can arise from GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) requirements related to fixed assets.
When a firm acquires a fixed asset:
Asset recorded on the balance sheet at cost.
Over its useful life, a portion of its cost is recorded as depreciation expense on the income statement.
Importantly, this depreciation does not represent a current cash outflow; cash was spent upon acquisition.
Cash flow lower than reported income occurs in years with significant fixed asset purchases.
Conversely, cash flow is higher than reported income in years when depreciation exceeds new fixed asset acquisitions.
Comparing income and cash flow statements can reveal:
Potential business trends or needs for further inquiries.
Shortfalls in cash flow may indicate rapid growth requiring additional financing or could suggest poor management of inventories/accounts receivable.
Simplest valuation of a business method: Value of assets minus liabilities
If values on the values on the balance sheet are accurate
Often it is not that simple & might have to use different method
Asset Approach:
Calculates value based purely on assets.
May not reflect true market value due to historical cost accounting limitations and exclusion of intangibles.
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis:
Estimate how much cash the business is likely to produce each year for its owners, and then determine how much that cash should be worth in today's dollars
Estimates future cash flows and determines their present value.
Regarded as one of the most reliable valuation methods.
Varies for each business; adjustments made based on company's current and projected financial performance.
Comparables Approach:
look at comparable businesses → particularly ones that have been valued recently or traded in the market
Evaluates comparable businesses to derive valuation metrics
EX) you might find some companies you believe are comparable to Widget, Inc. and base your valuation of Widget, Inc. on information about these companies
Involves negotiating appropriate comparisons; P/E (price-earnings) ratios often used.
The first method of valuing a business - assets and liabilities
Ex) Adjusted Book Value: Adjust valuable assets in exchange for how they might be liquidated
Book value of Widget’s assets minus liabilities was $1,510,000 in most recent year
if look at balance sheet now → this number equals assets of $5,260,000 minus liabilities of $3,750.000 (or tort liability)
This value represents what Widget would be worth if balance sheet ACTUALLY reflected all of its assets & liabilities
BUT these assumptions are often false ie book of value does NOT reflect actual value
BC Many assets are recorded at historical cost, not market value
Accounting depreciation and other markdowns might not reflect market realities
often excludes intangible assets, such as intellectual property and economic goodwill, which are important to the value of many businesses.
The asset approach also does not take into account the potential for a business to generate more cash flow or income in the future
Sometimes a business would be worth more being liquidated (its assets sold for cash) than continuing as a going concern
To make this determination, the market value of the assets and liabilities, including those not on the balance sheet, can be determined, by making appropriate adjustments to the balance sheet.
Ex) given some of Widget apparent trouble in moving inventory & collecting from customers— that a liquidation of the company might be a viable option and thus a useful way to value the business
Asset approach might be used for simple assets, such as office equipment
Although the asset approach has limitations, many company valuations nevertheless are based on assets
Ex) stock analysis often refers to the book value of assets of financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies, in determining and assessing their valuations
Regulators also use calculations based on asset values in examining such institutions.
For many small businesses, owners and prospective purchasers base their valuations on the book value of assets on the balance sheet, and then make common sense adjustments based on how accurate they think those numbers really are
Ex) you might start a negotiation by saying Widget office equipment is worth just $25,000, even though you understand there are good reasons it should be worth more
Routinely accepted by courts & regulators as a reliable method for experts to use in valuing a business, & it is widely used in practice
You calculate the value of a business in two steps
Step 1: Estimate Future Cash Flows
Starts with the income statement or the cash flow statement and then adjusts the numbers up or down based on estimates of likely future changes (Utilize income or cash flow statements)
Ex) look @ Widget Inc's financial state-ments → will see that it reported $390,000 of net income last year, and $285,000 of operating cash flow
How much annual cash flow should we expect from Widget in the future? Involves art & science
Ex) recall that Widget reported that it paid $120,000 of bonuses to the owners
These payments were not part of net income or operating cash flow, meaning that, if Widget hadn't paid bonuses, its net income and operating cash flow would have been much higher
Shouldn't you take these bonuses into account in valuing the company?
If you bought Widget you would not have to pay the former owners that $120,000
Instead, you could pay it to yourself (as salary or dividends), or reinvest it in the business
Other judgments for future prospects of Widget
will next year be better or worse?
what about the year after that?
when will the old equipment need replaced?
these will prob involve educated guesses
Discount each of these future cash flows to determine their present value (Normalize numbers based on expected future changes)
Present value & future value
basic idea is called the "time value of money”
Example:
suppose you have $100 today
keep that money in cash or a checking account that doesn't pay interest → then you'd still have $100 in the future
BUT could put the money in a bank account that pays a return
earn 10% annually on $100 → about $200 after 7 yrs
only earn 7% on that $100, it would take you longer → about 10 years-until you doubled your money
Rough approximation → "Rule of 72" is the # 72 divided by your % return is how long it will take for your money to double
It will take longer for your money to double if the rate is lower, shorter if the rate is higher
72 divided by 10 is about 7 → will take 7 yrs for $100 to become $200 at rate of 10%
72 divided by 7 is about 10 → will take 10 yrs for $100 to become $200 at rate of 7%
$100 today is not worth the same as $100 tomorrow
Instead, a present value of $100 today can grow to be worth a future value of $200
The higher the assumed % rate then the higher the future value relative to the present value
MAIN LESSON: do NOT compare $100 today to $100 tomorrow.
We should not add or subtract present vs. future values; they are like apples and oranges
Instead, we should try to convert future values into present values by using a technique known as "discounting."
Step 2: Discount Future Cash Flows
each future value cash flow is discounted to present value by using a "discount factor" based on a "discount rate," a rate of interest that corresponds to the cash flow
The higher the discount rate, the more the future cash flow is discounted in order to calculate its present value
Ex) suppose we will receive a cash flow in 7 yrs w/ a future value of $200, & we want to figure out its present value
If we use a discount rate of 7%, then we will calculate the present value as being about $100 (remember the rule of 72).
But if we instead assume a discount rate of 25%, the present value of that future cash flow would be a lot less than $100.
The lingo is that the future cash flow is "discounted" more, so that its present value is less
How should we figure out what discount rate to use when valuing a business?
Complicated question = based on numerous factors, including the risk associated w/ the future cash flows
Each of the future value cash flows in the middle column are then discounted to obtain the present value numbers in the far-right column
(Ex) the FV of $550,000 we estimate as a cash flow in year 5 is discounted to a PV of $180,224
today)
"terminal value" discounted cash analysis often involves this kind of estimate of the value of all of the future cash flows as of some final date, so we don't have to keep calculating these numbers for every year, forever.
Projected cash flows calculated and discounted to find present value estimates. Terminal value can also be calculated for the future cash flows beyond a specific year.
However one values a business, the company's financial statements will be a source of important information
But the financial statements should not be accepted at face value
Prospective purchasers will want to perform their "due diligence" and look behind the financial statement numbers
Ex) a purchaser should inquire what is behind the cost of goods sold, investigate overhead charges, understand the selling and marketing expenses, determine whether receivables really are collectible, and ascertain whether inventory is obsolete
In addition, an important part of "due diligence" is to inquire into contingent liabilities, such as possibly costly environmental claims or potential liability to customers
Despite valuable data from financial statements, purchasers should ask deeper questions & conduct thorough due diligence before transactions
uses comparable assets or businesses as a guide
Ex) thinking of buying a house & figuring out what a house should be worth
might find some comparable houses that have sold recently, & then assume that this house's value is similar
If houses in a neighborhood have been selling for around $500 per square foot - you might assume that a 2,000-square-foot house you are looking at is worth $1 million
Also involves some art
the seller of a house & their broker might assert that there have been just a few recent sales of houses that they claim are most like their house, and then claim that true comps have been selling for $600 per square foot
That is why they have listed this house at a price of $1.2 million.
You might respond by arguing that these houses are nicer than their house, or in a better location, so that they are not accurate comps
Instead, you might find recent house sales at closer to $400 per square foot, and claim that the house is worth much less
To value Widget using the comparables method
have to make some assumptions about how similar businesses have been valued
A frequent valuation method is to use a price-earnings ratio (or P/E ratio)
Suppose that a basket of companies similar to Widget have recently been purchased on average at 6 times "trailing earnings”
That is, the P/E ratio in these transactions has been 6—meaning that the purchase price paid for these companies has been 6.3 times recent annual net earnings as stated in the companies' financial statements
(This information → collected & carefully guarded by business valuators
If Widget were to be valued on this basis, a prospective purchaser might be willing to pay $2,340,000 based on the company's most recent earnings of $390,000
where 6 times $390,000 is equal to $2,340,000
Or, the purchaser might look at an average of Widget earnings over the past several years and apply the P/E ratio to this average
Given that Widget’s net earnings averaged $290,000 for the 3 most recent years, the purchaser might be willing to pay instead only $1,740,000
where $290,000 times 6 equals $1,740,000
Another indication of value using comparables might be the price at which shares of comparable companies have been trading
For publicly traded companies, this is one of the most frequent methods for company valuation
Pick some companies we think resemble Widget, & then calculate Widget's value based on their publicly available financial information, perhaps also using a P/E ratio or similar info
Buyers are typically willing to purchase control of publicly traded companies for more than the total market price of their issued shares (their "market capitalization," or "market cap")
This "control premium" is often in the range of 30-35%
Would need to adjust our valuation based on publicly traded comparables to include this control premium
As the sole shareholder of Widget, we obviously would have control
Using these various approaches, we could come up with a range of valuations based on comparables
As with the valuation of a house, we would need to justify our choice of comparables, and all of that would become part of our negotiations
Suppose that we come up with a range and claim that the average is $1,875,000. We might even include a detailed spreadsheet, with calculations that appear to be very scientific
So how much should Widget sell for?
Notice that our three valuation methods-based on assets, DCF, and comparables came to similar results, ranging between $1,8 million and $2.0 million
Might conclude that the value must be in that range
But you might also be suspicious
Our tight range of valuations reflected — some convenient assumptions that we made about asset market values, earnings, market comparables, and discount rates
It can be even more difficult to value startup companies, or companies that depend a lot on unpredictable events or technologies
Assets can be difficult to value
Future cash flows can be difficult to predict
And some companies are unique, and don't really have comparables
Ultimately, valuation is similar to financial analysis and accounting more generally
We are studying art, not science
Focus on the right side of the balance sheet = Capital Structure
Capital structure refers to how a company finances its operations through various means:
Debt (loans, bonds, etc.)
Equity (shares of stock)
how the corporation has been financed and whether money has been (and can be) paid to those who hold the corporation's debt and equity
Modigliani-Miller Theorem: In an ideal world, the structure shouldn’t affect a company's value.
Real-World Complexity: Actual capital structures often involve unpredictable elements, differing greatly by company
Companies typically start with a simple capital structure—just common stock owned by the founders and early employees. Over time, as they grow and need more funding, they add new layers to this structure
1. Early Stage: A company might begin with a small group of founders who divide common stock among themselves
2. Raising Funds: Startups often bring in outside investors by issuing “seed” funding and then multiple rounds of preferred stock
3. Growth & Exit: As the business expands, it may either sell to a larger company or go public through an initial public offering (IPO)
4. Tracking Ownership: With each new investment, ownership stakes shift. Lawyers and investors track these changes using a “cap table,” which lists all securities the company has issued, such as stock, convertible notes, warrants, and stock options
5. Founder Control: Many founders try to keep control, even after going public. Some companies use “dual-class” structures, where founders hold shares with extra voting power compared to public investors
6. Complex Structures: Some businesses, especially financial institutions, develop even more intricate capital structures over time
Corporations with different capital structures — ie different ratios of debt and equity-face different challenges
central question of this course: for whose benefit should the corporation be run?
Should corporate managers run the corporation for the exclusive benefit of equity?
Or for some combination or equity and debt?
And, if so, how should managers take debt into account in making decisions?
Corporations can raise money by issuing securities to investors
The investors are willing to give money to the corporation, in exchange for securities, bc they expect a return on their investment
Corporations have considerable flexibility in tailoring the terms of their securities to allocate control, profit, and risk among the various investors
Corporate securities can be divided into two broad categories: equity and debt.
In general, equity securities represent permanent commitments of capital to a corporation, while debt securities represent capital invested for a limited period of time
Returns on equity securities generally depend on the corporation earning a profit
Although equity securities might share in the corporation's assets in the event of liquidation, the rights of equity securities are subordinated to the claims of creditors, including those who hold the corporation's debt securities
On the other hand, holders of equity securities typically elect the corporation's board of directors & thus exert more control over the conduct of the corporation's business and the risks it incurs
In contrast, debt securities typically represent temporary contributions of capital (for example, until the maturity date of a loan)
Debt securities are more likely to have priority in terms of payment if the firm becomes insolvent or liquidates voluntarily
Because debt securities are less risky, they typically are entitled only to a fixed return
Holders of debt securities can secure their rights by placing liens on some or all of a corporation's assets
or by negotiating contractual covenants restricting the corporation's operations
Apart from such covenants, however, debt holders ordinarily play no role in the management of the firm
Although the distinction between equity and debt is not always sharp or well defined, it is a standard distinction, and most people use it
terms “common shares” & “preferred shares” describe the two basic kinds of equity securities
Corporate statutes require that at least one class of equity security have voting rights and the right to receive the net assets of the corporation in dissolution or liquidation
These rights usually are assigned to common shares
Basic terms of equity securities
When a corporation is formed, its articles of incorporation create authorized shares
Until shares are first sold to shareholders, they are authorized but unissued
When sold, they are authorized and issued or authorized and outstanding
If repurchased by the corporation, they become authorized and issued, but not outstanding— commonly referred to as “treasury shares”
Corporation statutes do not dictate how many or what kind of shares must be authorized
But the statutes do require that the articles specify the number of shares that a corporation is authorized to issue and, unless they are common shares, describe the characteristics of those shares
If a corporation has issued all the shares authorized in its articles, it cannot issue more shares unless the articles are amended to authorize additional shares
For this to happen, the board of directors must recommend the amendment, which must then be approved by holders of at least a majority of its outstanding voting shares
However, if a corporation has not issued all the shares authorized in its articles, then the board can decide on what terms to issue these authorized but unissued shares
Consequently, if a corporation's shareholders authorize more shares than the corporation currently plans to issue, they also delegate authority to the board to decide if, when, and on what terms additional shares should be issued
Should the organizers of a corporation authorize more shares than they initially plan to issue?
They might want to issue additional shares at a later date to raise new money, to use for employee benefit plans, or to acquire other companies.
As a practical matter, it may seem tempting to authorize a large number of shares at first so the corporation has the flexibility to issue additional shares in the future without the bother of amending the articles
However, convenience might not be the only issue, especially in a close cor-poration
Shareholders might wish to keep control over the issuance of new shares by authorizing only the number of shares the company will issue immediately
Ex) the articles might authorize 100 shares.
For the company to issue more shares in the future, there would have to be another shareholder vote to amend the articles (to increase the number of authorized shares above 100)
The need for an aditional vote can protect minority shareholders and preserve existing control relationships
However, such a limitation might enable one or more shareholders to prevent the company from raising additional capital by blocking the vote to authorize
additional shares
In large corporations
Shareholders usually exert relatively little influence over day-to-day management
Allowing the board to issue additional common shares may not constitute the surrender of much real power
Convenience usually decides the question in favor of an initial (and subsequent) authorization of many more shares than the corporation has current plans to issue
Under MBCA, shareholders retain some power over the issuance of additional shares of authorized stock
Shareholder approval is required if the corporation issues, for consideration other than cash or a cash equivalent, shares with voting power equal to more than 20% of the voting power outstanding immediately before the issuance
The precise number of shares that a shareholder owns in a corporation at a particular time determines her position relative to other shareholders
What is important, however, is not the absolute number of shares owned, but the percentage of the corporation's outstanding stock those shares represent (or more specifically, the voting power)
Ex) Assume that 2 corporations are identical except Corp A has two shares of common shares outstanding & Corp B has 1,000 shares outstanding
One share of Corp A, representing 50% of its outstanding shares, clearly would have more value and greater proportionate voting power than 100 shares of Corp B, representing 10% of its outstanding shares
When additional shares are sold to other investors, the voting power of existing shareholders is diminished in relative terms- or "diluted"
This is a problem for shareholders who want to maintain their proportionate voting interest to exercise a degree of control
The common law doctrine of "preemptive rights" addressed concerns about dilution
Courts held a shareholder had an inherent right to maintain her proportionate interest in a corporation by purchasing a proportionate number of any new shares issued for cash
Ex) a shareholder who owned 100 shares in a corporation with 1,000 shares issued and outstanding would be entitled to purchase 10% of any new issue
Although the preemption rights worked in closely held corporations with simple capital structures, it became problematic in corporations with several classes of shares or those that issued shares in exchange for property to be used in the business
Preemptive rights also were of questionable value in publicly held corporations: a typical public shareholder, owning far less than 1% of the outstanding shares, presumably would care little about being diluted, so long as the overall value of her shares were not affected
Moreover, if she believed the firm was selling new shares at too low a price, she could protect herself simply by purchasing additional shares on the open market
Courts and legislatures addressed the problems posed by preemptive rights
First courts developed several exceptions to the rule that shareholders always had preemptive rights
Legislatures have modified state corporate laws to allow corporations to avoid preemptive rights
Almost all public corporations exercised this option
Today, many states have adopted an "opt-in" approach to preemptive rights
MBCA $ 6.30(a) provides that "The shareholders of a corporation do not have a preemptive right to acquire the corporation's unissued shares except to the extent the articles of incorporation so provide."
To provide shareholders w/ such rights the articles must include an appropriate provision
A simple declaration, such as "The corporation elects to have preemptive rights"
Absent such a declaration in the articles, no preemptive rights exist
Delaware's corporate statute no longer explicitly addresses preemptive rights
But - DGCL $ 157 authorizes a corporation to issue rights to purchase its shares, which can include preemptive rights
In addition, a Delaware corporation can include a provision in its articles creating preemptive rights
Common Shares
Most basic of all corporate securities
All corporations have common shares
Many small corporations issue no other kind of equity security
Holders of common shares usually have the exclusive power to elect a corporation's board of directors
Although in some corporations one or more classes of common shares are non-voting
In many corporations preferred shares have limited voting shares
Common shares represent a "residual claim" on both the current income & the assets of a corporation
Income that remains after a corporation has satisfied the claims of creditors and holders of its more senior securities -preferred shares and debt - "belongs" in a conceptual sense to the holders of common shares
(ie Left over income after debts are paid belong to common share holders)
If no income remains, shareholders receive nothing
If some income remains, the board of directors can distribute it to shareholders in the form of a "dividend" or can choose to have it reinvested in the business
At least in theory, the board should choose to reinvest income only if it believes that the future returns from that investment will be greater than those that shareholders could generate by investing that income on their own elsewhere
If the corporation is liquidated:
Common shares also represent a residual claim on the corporation's assets
This means that in liquidation the corporation must first pay the claims of creditors and holders of preferred shares
Common shareholders receive whatever "residual" remains
As a consequence, common shareholders are the first to lose their investment if the corporation experiences economic difficulties
& they have the greatest potential for gain if the corporation is successful
Common shares generally represent a permanent commitment of capital to a corporation
Holders of common shares, if they wish to get out of their investment, generally do so by "exit"
“exit” — selling their shares to other investors, who buy at a price that reflects the firm's current value
Generally, common shares are not redeemable & the corporation has no obligation to repurchase them from shareholders
If a corporation is paying large current dividends or is reinvesting its income successfully, shareholders often will be able to realize substantial gains by selling their common shares to other investors
However, shareholders of close corporations might not be able to find a ready market for their shares
Although common shareholders are last in line when it comes to distributions of income and in liquidation → they generally are first in line with respect to control
They often have the exclusive right to elect the board of directors & to vote on other matters that require shareholders' approval
This combination of voting rights and a residual claim on profits and assets gives shareholders a strong incentive to ensure that the corporation is operated efficiently
If shareholders elect competent directors and monitor their performance effectively, they will realize the benefits of those directors' sound business decisions
If shareholders elect incompetent directors or fail to monitor their performance effectively, they will bear the loss if the directors mismanage the corporation's business or misappropriate its assets
Common shareholders also are seen as the primary beneficiaries of the fiduciary duties that corporate law imposes on the board of directors
Courts defer to a considerable degree to directors' business judgments
but they do so on the assumption that directors have exercised reasonable diligence & acted in the corporation's and thus the shareholders' best interests
These obligations extend to decisions concerning whether a corporation should reinvest its profits or distribute them as dividends
In addition, directors have a duty to refrain from engaging in transactions that will provide them with unfair profits at the corporation's expense
(ie directors have broad discretion to manage, but must bear in mind that they are managing other people's money and that they have obligations to do so with care, loyalty, and good faith)
Preferred Shares
Preferred Shares have economic rights senior to those customarily assigned to common shares
They vary widely, depending on the attributes assigned to them in the articles of incorporation
If no attribute is assigned to a class of shares with respect to its voting rights, right to dividends, or rights to redemption or in liquidation, courts generally will presume that "stock is stock"
“Stock is stock” is stock with certain preferences otherwise have the same rights as does common stock
Thus, although the rights attached to preferred shares are set forth in articles authorizing such shares
The rights of preferred shares are viewed as part of a contract b/n the preferred shareholders and the corporation
Preferred shares almost always have dividend rights senior to those of common shares - meaning that payment of dividends on common shares cannot happen until dividends due on preferred shares have been paid
A preferred share's dividend preference usually will be stated as a fixed amount that must be paid annually or quarterly
The preference may expire if a dividend due for a given period is not paid
or it may be "cumulative" —meaning that if a dividend is not paid when due, the right to receive that dividend accumulates and all accrued dividend arrearages must be paid before any dividends can be paid on common shares
Preferred shares also may be "participating."
Meaning preferred shares will receive dividends whenever they are paid on common shares
either in the same amount as or as a multiple of the amount paid on common shares
In addition to a dividend preference → preferred shares often have a preference in liquidation, generally stated as a right to receive a specified amount before any amounts are distributed with respect to common shares
The amount of this preference most often is the amount that the corporation received when it sold the preferred shares plus, in the case of cumulative preferred, any accumulated unpaid dividends
In some instances, there may also be a specified "liquidation premium" that must be paid
However, as with common shares, the liquidation rights of preferred shares are subordinate to the claims of creditors
Consequently, when a corporation does not have assets sufficient to pay its debts, the preferred shareholders receive nothing in the event of liquidation
Preferred shares sometimes represent a permanent commitment of capital to a corporation and sometimes do not
In the latter event, the shares are "redeemable" for some specified amount-that is, the corporation will repurchase the shares from the preferred shareholders
The right to require redemption may be held by the shareholder, by the corporation, or by both
The amount for which shares are to be redeemed generally is equal to the preference to which they are entitled in the event of liquidation, although it is not unusual to provide that, when shares are redeemable by the corporation, some premium above that amount must be paid by the corporation
Preferred shares can have voting rights and will be deemed to have voting rights equal to those of common shares, unless the articles of incorporation provide other-wise
Sometimes the preferred have voting rights on an "as-converted" basis with the common shares, but often the voting rights of preferred shares are limited to specified issues and circumstances
They usually have a statutory right to vote on changes in the corporate structure that affect adversely their rights and preferences
In addition, preferred shares are often given the right to elect some or all of a corporation's directors if dividends due on the preferred shares are not paid for some designated period
Such provisions reflect the nature of the contract between holders of preferred shares and the corporation
(In short, the preferred shareholders may relinquish their right to participate in control in exchange for a priority claim to periodic dividends, but if the corporation fails to pay those dividends, preferred shareholders then become entitled to exert control)
The standard features of preferred shares may be supplemented by a variety of other features, including the right to convert preferred shares into common shares at some specified ratio, the right to vote on certain transactions, or the right to require the corporation to redeem preferred shares if and when specified events should occur
As noted, these rights are essentially contractual in nature and must be spelled out in the articles
Moreover, most courts have taken the position that the preferred shareholders are owed fiduciary duties only when they rely on a right shared equally with the common stock and not when they invoke their special contractual rights
Preferred shares are a favorite way for "venture capital" (VC) firms to finance "start-up" or "early-stage" businesses, particularly in areas of new technology
After such companies have raised their initial capital and need more money to expand or survive, they often will raise money from VC firms, which manage investment pools comprised of wealthy individuals and large institutional investors, like pension plans and university endowments
Why do VC firms prefer convertible preferred stock?
A number of explanations exist, ranging from tax motivations to governance
Ex) convertible preferred stock has long been attractive to VCs because of its hybrid nature, which gives VC firms some protection on the downside and the ability to convert their equity to common stock on the upside
VC firms can negotiate specific protections in their preferred, including a liquidation preference, the right to elect a certain number of directors to the board, and the ability to convert their preferred shares into common shares if the company goes public
Corporations often raise money by selling preferred shares in lieu of taking on debt
The two have obvious similarities
The price at which a company can sell preferred shares is influenced by factors similar to those that determine the price at which it can borrow-the dividend rate, the redemption features, whether the preferred can be converted into common shares and, if so, at what price
Consequently, the requirement that the terms of preferred shares be spelled out in the articles can pose real timing problems, especially in the case of a publicly held company
It usually takes a minimum of 30 days to obtain shareholder approval of an amendment to the articles of incorporation authorizing new preferred shares
By the end of that period, market conditions are likely to have changed enough so that whatever terms were specified at the beginning of the period must again be modified
Most corporation statutes address this timing problem by permitting the articles to authorize "blank check preferred shares," the essential characteristics of which —rights to dividends, liquidation preferences, redemption rights, voting rights, and conversion rights— can be set by the board of directors at the time the shares are sold
Such an authorization may facilitate the sale of preferred shares, but it also enhances substantially the power of a corporation's board of directors by allowing it to issue preferred shares with rights that may materially impinge on those of common shares without first obtaining explicit shareholder approval
Ex) many corporate boards use blank check preferred shares as part of "poison pill" rights plans, because the issuance does not require shareholder approval
Debt securities represent a corporation's liabilities to lenders
They can be labeled notes, debentures, or bonds—and sometimes these terms are used interchangeably
Typically, notes and debentures have shorter maturities than bonds, and debentures are usually not secured by corporate assets
Some short-term debt securities resemble accounts payable or the debts of trade creditors
But typically, debt securities are part of a company’s long-term interests in a corporation’s financial fortunes
The terms of a bond typically are fixed by a complex contract known as an indenture that specifies the rights and obligations of the bondholders and the corporation
Whether or not an indenture is used, certain fundamental terms are set forth in every debt contract
For example, the corporate borrower is obliged to repay a fixed amount of principal on a particular date
Typically, interest must be paid at periodic intervals, whether the interest is a floating rate that varies over time or is fixed throughout the term of the contract
Importantly, the interest obligation does not depend on whether the corporation earns a profit
If the corporation fails to pay interest on a bond when interest is due, it will be deemed in default
Typically, an event of default will cause the entire principal amount of the bond to become due immediately, and this "acceleration" entitles the bondholders to pursue all legal remedies for which they have bargained, including the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings
The indenture can require that the corporation repay the entire principal amount all at once at maturity, or it can specify that the corporation make periodic principal payments, so that the principal amount is "amortized" over time
Some indentures require that borrowers make payments into a "sinking fund" that will be used to repay part of the principal prior to the bond's maturity date
If a bond is secured, the debt contract also must specify the terms of the security arrangement and the collateral that secures the bond
The debt contract also may include provisions, known as covenants or negative covenants, requiring the borrower to refrain from taking certain actions that might jeopardize the position of the bondholders
A corporation may agree, for example, not to pay any dividends or repurchase any of its own shares unless it meets certain financial conditions
Bonds may be made redeemable or "callable" at a fixed price at the option of the corporation
This right can be valuable to a corporation; if interest rates decline, it can redeem outstanding high-interest bonds by issuing lower-interest bonds or otherwise borrowing at a lower interest rate
To compensate bondholders for their loss of income, a bond's redemption price usually is set at something above the principal that the bondholders would be entitled to receive when the bonds mature
Because the terms and conditions of debt securities are fixed entirely by contract and often are the result of extensive negotiations, many other provisions may be included in a debt contract
For example, the corporation might give the bondholder the right to convert bonds into common shares
So-called convertible debentures are hybrid securities that closely resemble convertible preferred shares-indeed, two such instruments might have all of the same substantive terms so that the only real difference is the label
Unless the articles of incorporation provide to the contrary, a corporation's board of directors has the authority to issue debt securities w/out shareholder approval
The board decides whether the corporation should incur new debt, in what amount, and on what terms and conditions
The board must involve shareholders only if it decides to issue bonds that will be convertible into shares and the corporation does not have enough authorized shares to satisfy the bonds' conversion rights
In such a case, the board must seek shareholder approval of an amendment to the articles increasing the number of authorized shares
However, shareholders need not approve the issuance of the convertible debt securities
The use of long-term debt as part of a corporation's capital structure creates a tension between debt and equity investors
Both have stakes in the long-term health of the corporation, and both benefit if the corporation accumulates funds in excess of the amount it needs for current operations
But holders of debt and equity have agreed to different trade-offs between risk and reward, and each thus has a different perspective on how much risk that a corporation should assume
Unless she has bargained for a right to convert her debt into equity, a bondholder has accepted rights to fixed payments of interest and repayment of her capital in lieu of the possibly higher, but uncertain, returns available to holders of equity securities, especially common shares
Common shareholders have assumed more risk, but also can exercise more control over the conduct of the corporation's business
A debt holder is viewed as an outsider entitled only to the protection specified in her contract
In contrast, common shareholders are protected by directors' fiduciary duties, including the duty to advance the interests of the common shareholders even if at the expense of the interests of non-shareholders
In addition to debt and equity, companies often issue options, which are the right to buy securities, typically common shares, at a specified time and price
Stock options are important pieces of the financial accounting and valuation puzzle
Corporate lawyers frequently deal with options, in part because most publicly traded companies and many private companies award stock options to managers and employees
The definition of an option is simple: it is the right to buy or sell something in the future
Options are everywhere
A tenant with the right to renew a lease at a particular monthly rate owns an option
A car rental company that permits a client to purchase the car's tank of gasoline in advance is selling an option
Any corporation that gives its employees the right to buy its shares at a set time and price also has issued an option
Options generally are known as contingent claims, because they are assets whose value and future payoff depend on the outcome of some uncertain contingent event, such as fluctuations in rental markets, gasoline use on a trip, or changes in the corporation's stock price
Remember: a party who owns an option has a contractual right (to buy or sell), but not a contractual obligation to do so
A tenant with a right to renew the lease need not renew; a car renter who pre-purchases a tank of gas need not use all of it; and an employee with stock options is not obligated to buy corporate stock
(Simply stated, option holders have rights, not obligations)
The most familiar type of option is the stock option
Corporations frequently grant stock options to their employees, particularly senior managers, as compensation
Again, the option holder has the right-but not the obligation-to buy shares of the company
Options have a special terminology:
The right to buy shares is known as a call option, whereas the right to sell is known as a put option
The price specified in an option contract is known as the strike price or exercise price
The date specified in an option contract is known as the maturity date or expiration date
Corporations typically issue only call options
When issued to the public, call options are sometimes known as warrants
Stock options awarded to managers typically are call options with a ten-year maturity date and an exercise price equal to the market price when the options were awarded
As incentive compensation, the options may be subject to a vesting period over which time the rights become exercisable
Debt Securities:
Represent money borrowed by the company, reflecting a firm's liabilities. They come in various forms (bonds, debentures).
Key terms typically defined in an indenture, outlining borrower’s obligations, interest rates, and payment schedules.
Equity Securities:
Common shares typically represent residual claims on company income and assets.
Holders have exclusive rights to elect directors and influence corporate governance.
Preferred shares may have fixed dividends and senior rights over common shares.
Capital structure can evolve over time, exemplifying initial offerings to complex arrangements including multiple classes of shares.
Corporations must strive to maintain an attractive investment opportunity amidst fluctuating market conditions.
Understanding valuation and capital structure is essential for corporate management, investors, and those engaged in corporate law.
Each approach to asset valuation and management's fiduciary duties is crucial in decision-making processes.