Course Code: PS11610
Title: Qualitative Research
Instructor: Dr. Jason Bush
Contact Information: jeb64@aber.ac.uk
Key Topics Discussed:
Qualitative methods and data analysis
Real-world examples utilizing qualitative methods:
Hearing voices study (Thematic Analysis - TA)
Well-being of young people caring for a dependent relative (Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis - IPA)
Tattoos as Narrative Identity (Thematic Analysis - TA)
Living with Chronic Mental Illness (Photovoice Study - Qualitative Content Analysis - QCA)
Mental well-being of patients from ethnic minorities during critical care (Grounded Theory Analysis - GT)
Definition: Qualitative research aims to access experiences, meanings, or processes through various data collection methods.
In-depth Interviewing: Captures rich data about people's lives and experiences.
Types of Interviews:
Semi-structured interviews: Predetermined questions but allows for flexibility.
Unstructured interviews: No predefined format, more like a conversation.
Elicitation Methods:
Photo elicitation/photo voice
Walking interviews
Life history interviewing
Research Questions: Are provisional and may change during research, framed differently depending on the method used.
Definition: A focus group is a group interview where interaction among participants serves as data.
Structure: Utilizes guided but unstructured discussions on topics of interest.
Role of Moderator: Encourages discussion rather than simply asking questions to explore participant perspectives.
Purpose: Research-directed diaries used for participants to record thoughts, experiences, and feelings related to a topic.
Types:
Can include handwritten diaries, electronic formats, audio/video diaries, or creative scrapbooks.
Frequency: Requires regular entries and can be short or long-term.
Definition: Researchers immerse themselves in participants' cultures, settings, and experiences.
Methodology: Intensive observation which involves recording and analyzing observations as a member of the community over time.
Data Collection: Utilizes field notes.
Types of Analysis:
Content Analysis: Focuses on what is said (content-driven).
Thematic Analysis (TA): Examines recurring themes in data.
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): Focus on individual experiences and the role of interpretation.
Grounded Theory: Aims to develop theories based on collected data.
Discourse Analysis (DA): Studies language and its action-oriented nature.
Conversation Analysis (CA): Focuses on language within situational contexts.
Purpose: Illustrate the application of qualitative methods in practical research scenarios.
Focus: Thematic analysis of individuals' experiences with voice hearing in India (Sinha & Ranganathan, 2020).
Identify a Research Problem: Need to understand the meanings behind voices rather than just treating them as pathological.
Study Design: One-to-one interviews and demographic data from 27 participants and caregivers in a psychiatric setting.
Analysis Method: Thematic analysis yielding three main themes.
Findings:
Dominance of biomedical approaches leading to questions of normalcy after treatment.
Ethics Approval: Obtained from the Ethics Committee at the Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad.
Interview Protocol: Engaged participants through detailed thematic analysis framework.
Key Statistics:
Gender Distribution: Female (14), Male (13)
Age Groups, Educational Background, Socioeconomic Status, Diagnoses, Plus Occupation data.
Sample Questions:
Dialogue with voices (Yes/No) and examples.
Other unusual experiences (visions, altered states).
Situations where voices are present.
Reference: Maastricht Hearing Voices Interview Guide (2011).
Themes Identified:
Dealing with Voices: Participants' emotional engagement and efforts.
Control Over Voices: Strategies used by both voice-hearers and caregivers.
Dominance of Medical Discourse: Perception of normative status influenced by medication.
Insights: Accounts show voices understood in context, significant familial and community support in managing experiences, and limitations of medical frameworks.
Emphasis on understanding individual narratives and coping across cultural contexts.
Study Citation: Bolas, H., Wersch, A. V., & Flynn, D. (2007).
Research Problem: Explore the impact of informal caregiving on the well-being of young people.
Design: Semi-structured interviews with participants 14-18 years old.
Analysis Method: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis with three superordinate themes.
Ethics Process: Informed consent from young participants and caretakers was conducted before interviews.
Sample Size: Five young carers were interviewed.
Participant Information: Includes relationships to dependents, ages, and care circumstances.
Highlights variations in family contexts and types of impairments.
Superordinate Themes:
What Caring Means: Sense of obligation coupled with frustration.
Isolation: Social withdrawal due to caring responsibilities.
Integrating Caring: Navigating personal identity amidst societal stigma.
Main Findings: Emphasizes the multidimensional struggles of young carers and highlights the need for systemic support.
Citation: Naude, F., & Naude, L. (2024). Study focuses on tattoos' role in narrative identity.
Research Problem: Explore the narratives behind tattoos among students at a culturally diverse university.
Design: One-to-one interviews with thematic data analysis.
Ethics Process: Ethical consent obtained for interviews with participants aged 18-29 possessing visible tattoos.
Overview of interpretations of their tattoos and meanings in the context of identity and personal history.
Identified Themes:
Identity, Affiliation, Reminiscence, Perseverance, and Opposing Viewpoints.
Conclusions Drawn: Tattoos are complex in their expression of identity, agency, and resilience and impact familial dialogue about identity.
Citation: Thompson et al., (2008) Photovoice study on chronic mental illness experiences.
Research Problem: Understanding experiences of adults living with chronic mental illness.
Design: Interviews with participant-provided photos, analyzed through qualitative content analysis.
Ethics Process: Required ethical consent from institutional review board. Sample size of seven participants.
Major Themes: Valued experiences, desire for support, coping strategies, and societal invisibility.
Key Insights: There's a need for more societal education regarding mental health, and the actual experience can provide depth to understanding their struggles.
Citation: Van Keer et al. (2017) study focusing on critical care experiences.
Research Problem: Mental well-being of ethnic minority patients and related risk factors.
Design: Utilized qualitative ethnographic design with various data triangulation methods.
Ethics Process: Research approved by university ethics committee. Involves various stakeholders (patients, relatives, and staff).
Identified Needs: Social contact, information exchange, alleviating pain, and participation in decision-making processes.
Insights: Indicates a call for holistic approaches in patient-centered care, addressing emotional loneliness, and incorporating diverse cultural perspectives in care models.
Methods:
Conferences
Presentations
Journal publications
Workshops
Social media platforms (TikTok, Instagram, etc.)
Websites and blogs.
Key Takeaways: Overview of qualitative methods and in-depth analysis through real-world examples:
Hearing Voices Study (TA)
Well-Being of Young Carers (IPA)
Tattoos and Narrative Identity (TA)
Living with Chronic Mental Illness (QCA)
Mental Well-Being of Ethnic Minorities in Critical Care (GT).