Version: 1.3 (Effective from 10/08/2021)
Audience: Applicable department-wide, including all state schools and educational settings.
Commitment to Inclusiveness: The department is creating a more inclusive education system at all levels (policy and regional) and in daily practice.
Definition of Inclusive Education: It means all students can access and participate fully in learning with their peers, with support through reasonable adjustments and tailored teaching strategies.
Embedding Inclusion: Inclusion should be ingrained in all aspects of school life, supported by culture, policies, and daily practices.
Integration: Placement with peers without necessary adjustments, limiting full access to learning.
Segregation: Learning in separate environments, isolating students from their peers.
Exclusion: Students cannot access any education.
High Expectations: The belief that with adequate support, all students can succeed, regardless of background, identity, or ability.
Goals for Students:
Attend local state schools and education centers.
Engage in quality education alongside peers.
Learn in safe, supportive environments free from bullying and discrimination.
Achieve academic and social success through tailored support.
System-wide Approach: Implementation based on evidence across all departments and schools, removing barriers to inclusion.
Committed Leaders: Leaders at all levels are accountable for promoting a culture of inclusion.
Whole School Responsibility: Collaboration among all school community members to ensure student participation.
Collaboration with Families: Engagement with parents and caregivers as partners in decision-making.
Respecting Diversity: Embracing all students and families as valued community members; addressing barriers through tailored plans.
Skilled Workforce: Continuous professional development for staff to enhance inclusive practices.
Accessible Environments: Schools are designed for full participation of all students.
Effective Transitions: Support for transitions between educational stages, partnering with families and communities.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular assessment of student progress and evaluation of inclusive practices at all levels.
Mandatory adherence to the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 (Qld) and relevant discrimination laws.
Strategies for inclusion tailored to:
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
Culturally and linguistically diverse students
LGBTIQ students
Students in out-of-home care
Rural and remote students
Students with disabilities
Students with mental health needs
Gifted and talented students.
Discrimination:
Direct: Unfavorable treatment based on a characteristic (e.g., disability, race).
Indirect: Uniform treatment that disadvantages a specific group.
Inclusive Education: Full access and participation for all students with tailored strategies.
Reasonable Adjustment: Measures to assist students with disabilities for equal educational participation.
Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cwlth)
Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld)
Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cwlth)
Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld)
Other relevant acts pertaining to education and human rights.
Various plans and frameworks supporting inclusive education and the successful engagement of diverse learners.
Accessibility to key policies regarding student well-being and engagement.
For further details, reach out to the State Schools – Disability and Inclusion Branch at support.diversity@qed.qld.gov.au.
Mandatory adherence to the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 (Qld) and relevant discrimination laws.
Strategies for inclusion tailored to:
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
Culturally and linguistically diverse students
LGBTIQ students
Students in out-of-home care
Rural and remote students
Students with disabilities
Students with mental health needs
Gifted and talented students.
Resource Limitations:
Schools often face budgeting constraints that make it difficult to implement necessary inclusivity measures as mandated by legislation.
Teacher Workload:
Increased expectations for providing inclusive education can overwhelm teachers, as they may already manage large class sizes and diverse learner needs.
Training and Professional Development:
Effective implementation of inclusive practices requires ongoing training, which may not always be provided due to funding and time constraints.
Individual Needs vs. Standardization:
While legislation encourages tailored support for diverse learners, delivering such individualized attention can be challenging within a standardized curriculum.
Administrative Support:
Compliance with legal frameworks may require additional administrative tasks, straining school resources and reducing the focus on direct teaching.
Community Engagement:
Involving families and communities in decision-making for inclusive practices can be hampered by logistical issues and limited school resources.