2.4 Parietal Lobe
Chapter 5: The Parietal Lobes
Overview of Parietal Lobes
The parietal lobes are involved in the perception of somatosensory events and spatial functions.
Damage to this area results in a wide array of symptoms.
The parietal lobe can be divided into two sections:
Anterior Region (Postcentral Gyrus): Responsible for somatosensory perception, tactile perception, and body sense.
Posterior Region: Associated with language, spatial orientation, neglect, symbolic synthesis, apraxias, cross-modal matching, and memory.
Page 1: Structure of the Parietal Lobes
The parietal lobes have arbitrary boundaries with some subdivisions of little functional significance.
Key Features:
The anterior area noted as the sensory strip is posterior to the Rolandic fissure.
The sensory area may not have precise localization.
The complexity of symptoms post-lesion can be attributed to various interconnected functions of this lobe.
Page 2: Somatosensory Perception
Sensory Strip Representation
The post-Rolandic sensory strip displays a point-to-point localization:
Areas with high sensory acuity (e.g., fingertips) have more cortex dedicated to them.
Cortical representation is mainly contralateral; two sensory systems operate:
Lemniscal: Touch sensation.
Extralemniscal: Temperature and pain.
Two-Point Threshold Test
The sensitivity of skin regions can be assessed using two sharp points to measure the smallest discernible distance in sensation.
Page 3: Impacts of Lesions
Effects of Primary and Secondary Cortex Lesions
Lesions can alter sensation from the body, causing:
Anesthesia or dysesthesia (loss/alteration of sensation).
Kinesthetic information disruption, affecting spatial perception and limb positioning.
Disagreements exist regarding sensory representation asymmetry in left vs. right hemispheres based on various studies.
Page 4: Tactile Perception and Body Sense
Somatosensory Agnosias
Tactile deficits are termed somatosensory agnosias, categorized as:
Astereognosis: Inability to recognize objects by touch alone.
Asymbolia: Equivalent to astereognosis.
Assessment can be conducted using tasks like the Seguin-Goddard Formboard.
Types of Asomatognosia
Anosognosia: Lack of awareness of body limb positions and possible sensory loss, often seen with right-sided lesions.
Autotopagnosia: Inability to localize or name body parts, often resulting from left-side injuries.
Finger Agnosia: Specific difficulty with the identification and naming of fingers, assessed through various tests.
Page 5: Complex Relationships in Cognitive Deficits
Astereognosis can overlap with visual object agnosia, suggesting interlinked cognitive processes.
Common tests for visual agnosia include:
Gollin Figures
Mooney Closure Faces Test
Unconventional Views of Objects Test
Page 6: Spatial Orientation and Impairments
Understanding Spatial Representation
Spatial orientation relates directly to functions associated with visuospatial agnosia, where challenges arise in:
Identifying object orientations relative to the observer.
Tests include:
Pool Reflections Test: Identifying patterns in reflection.
Stick Test: Reproducing spatial configurations presented by the examiner.
Memory and Spatial Trials
Assessments like the Tactual Performance Test and Benton Visual Retention Test help identify spatial memory deficits.
Page 7: Disturbances of Spatial Location
Patients can have issues following familiar routes, affecting personal navigation.
Assessment includes performing tasks like following a map (Locomotor Map Following Task), revealing parietal lesion impacts.
Page 8: Right-Parietal Lesions
Right parietal lesions are associated with more pronounced difficulties in spatial location and left-right discrimination.
Tests include the Money Road Map Test to evaluate navigational skills.
Page 9: Spatial Neglect
Nature of Spatial Neglect
Spatial neglect leads to a lack of attention to one side of space, commonly impacting the opposite side of the lesion.
Right lesions typically result in left-sided neglect.
Symptoms observed include:
Bumping into objects on the neglected side.
Neglecting one half of written tasks or meals.
Attention vs. Awareness
Studies have indicated that patients can process neglected information at an unconscious level, leading to preference for intact stimuli when given choices.
Page 10: Treatment Strategies
Treatments involve enhancing attention to neglected spaces or using contralateral limb activation.
Imagining movement may prove useful for reducing neglect.
Spontaneous remission and phases of recovery are noted, evolving from allesthesia to simultaneous extinction.
Page 11: Symptoms and Neural Connections
Concept of Neglect
Attention, sensory perception, and spatial awareness are linked factors behind neglect.
Clinical observations highlight how patients may display misdirected responses, indicating errors in spatial perception.
Page 12: Cognitive Interaction in Neglect
Tasks assessing drawing abilities reflect parietal lobe functionality, including drawing errors unique to lesion impacts.
Observations reveal differences in errors based on the location of a lesion.
Page 13: Inter-sensory Association
Cross-modal Integration Deficits
Posterior parietal lesions affect tactile-visual integration.
The left hemisphere emphasizes identity and semantics, while the right handles location and visuospatial properties, contributing to higher-level deficits.
Page 14: Short-term Memory and Parietal Lesions
Some parietal lesions can lead to issues with short-term auditory memory (e.g., rapid forgetting in patients like KF).
Page 15: Gerstmann Syndrome
Overview
Gerstmann syndrome combines agraphia, acalculia, right-left confusion, and finger agnosia, though it's debated as a unitary syndrome.
Page 16: Language Function
Posterior parietal areas contribute significantly to language functions alongside the frontal and temporal lobes, particularly in auditory reception and reading.
Page 17: Conclusion
Summary of Parietal Functions
Parietal lobe lesions lead to diverse functions impacted, with variabilities due to patient-specific cognitive strategies.
The bilateral representation of functions complicates understanding, revealing an interplay between spatial and verbal processes in cognitive tasks.