Liberalism is a theory of international politics emphasizing globalization as the fundamental force in world politics.
Globalization represents interdependence among different societal groups, influencing state actions and preferences.
Liberalism is a bottom-up theory:
It posits that globalization drives varying state preferences.
Different state preferences influence state actions.
Basic actors in liberal theories:
Individuals and societal groups representing their interests to political entities (mainly states).
States can be seen as cities, tribes, empires, or political actors.
Commercial Liberal Theory:
Focuses on material (particularly economic) interests of states.
Examines how states manage interdependence economically for the benefit of dominant societal groups.
Ideational Liberalism:
Concentrates on the ideals and beliefs of societal groups.
Emphasizes efforts to realize these ideals in international relations.
Republican Liberalism:
Analyzes domestic institutions and their role in selecting which group interests are represented by the state.
Combining interests, ideas, and institutions offers a comprehensive view of state preferences and behaviors.
Critique of liberal theory’s complexity:
Critics argue that liberalism's multiple preferences (commercial, Republican, ideational) complicate its explanations.
Proponents assert that theories should match their complexity with the material they study.
A good theory should generate mid-range claims:
Examples include theories of the democratic peace hypothesis and compliance with international organizations.
Effectiveness in explaining variation in international system outcomes:
Capable of predicting cooperative behavior among states under certain conditions (e.g., trade interests).
Liberal theory explains:
The growth of international organizations like WTO and EU in facilitating trade.
The democratic peace phenomenon, where democracies avoid conflicts with each other.
Predicts warfare conditions:
States with opposing ideologies or democratic vs. non-democratic regimes are more likely to engage in conflict.
Differences between realism and liberalism:
Realists argue war causes are rooted in the distribution of coercive power, while liberals focus on state preferences.
Realist view: Domestic differences in states don't affect their actions under similar power configurations.
Liberal dismissal of this view:
Historical context shows that domestic characteristics significantly influence state behavior.
Debate on systemic vs. domestic theories:
Kenneth Waltz categorizes realism as systemic and liberalism as domestic, but both emphasize state characteristics.
Key distinction:
Realism: distribution of coercive power.
Liberalism: distribution of social preferences and state preferences.
US-China Relations:
Western policy focuses on engagement with China, betting that economic integration will lead to pacification of the state.
Historical context highlights regime change's influence on foreign policy approaches.
Interplay of theories:
While realist elements exist (balancing China), liberalism predominantly explains the rationale behind engagement with China.
Example of change:
Engagement with China as a partner was prompted by domestic regime changes (notably Deng Xiaoping's rise after Mao).
Liberalism provides a framework to understand shifting state behaviors based on societal preferences and interests.
Offers a nuanced perspective of international relations and state interactions, particularly in the context of globalization.