I. Introduce and do Heinz Dilemma
II. Morals v. Values
Morals: societal view of right and wrong- ethics
Values: individual view of right and wrong
III. Does moral development happen based on age? What influences moral development?
IV. Basis of Kohlberg Theory
In the 1950s, he gave young white boys the Heinz dilemma
He looked at how they justified the action, not the result
The theory is not based on age, rather our cognitive and psychosocial development
There’s no requirement to get all the stages… you might just stay where you are cognitively and psychosocially able to be
it is very rare to regress in stages
can’t skip stages
his theory is based on and solely relies on justice
V. Where theory comes from
VI. 3 levels and 6 stages-info. In chart
KHOLDBERG TAKES NO ACCOUNT OF EMOTIONS, only justice
Preconventional Morality
Punishment and Obedience
He shouldn’t steal the drug because he might get caught and be punished
Individualism v. Exchange of Favors
It won’t do him any good to steal the drug because his wife will be dead by the time he gets out of jail
Conventional Morality
Good Boy/Good Girl
Get the approval of people that matter to you
Most middle school kids, some high school kids
Actions that will please others, especially those who you think have status
Maintaining relationships with people who have status through doing what you think they want you to do
You may even put your own wants aside
EMPHASIS ON CONFORMITY (like some of Erikson’s stages)
Heinz dilemma- if the majority of their peers says steal it then they steal it
He shouldn’t steal the drug because others will think he is a theif
Law and Order
The rules are the rules and you follow the rules
Typically at high school
It’s for society as a whole
The focus is to follow rules & respect authority
View on rules is inflexible
Although his wife needs the drug, he should not break the law to get it. His wife’s condition doesn’t justify stealing it
Post-Conventional Morality
Social Contract
Created by a French philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau
Stage 5 is very rarely seen before college
People begin to account for different values, opinions, & belief of others
Recognize that rules are merely agreements on behavior, which can change
Protecting individual rights- not absolute
Rules that don’t serve society can change
He shouldn’t steal the drug, the druggist response is unfair but mutual respect for the rights of others must be maintained
Universal Ethical Principle
Almost nobody gets here, so it’s considered a hypothetical ideal stage
Follow a few abstract, universal principles that transcend the law
Disobey laws that violate own ethical principles
Someone violating a law because of their own intrinsic value that they have
He should steal the drug but alert authorities he has done it. He will have to face a penalty, but he will save a human life
VII. Criticisms of Kohlberg
-moral thinking vs. moral doing/acting (we can say all we want but it’s not the same as what we’d actually do in the moment
-overemphasizes justice, ignores caring, compassion, and emotion
-gender bias- idea of different set of moral thinking
-western cultural bias- different and diverse cultures were not looked at for that- lack of regard for other societies
VIII. 2 key questions for Kohlberg
-discontinuous
-nurture