Three Major Exceptions:
Independent Source: Evidence obtained from a separate lawful procedure is admissible.
Good Faith: Evidence collected in the belief that it was obtained legally may still be permitted, even if it ends up being invalid.
Inevitable Discovery: Evidence that would have been discovered lawfully regardless of the illegal action is admissible.
Overview:
All evidence acquired through illegal searches and seizures is inadmissible in criminal trials.
Violates the 4th Amendment right against unreasonable searches.
Extended to include "fruit of the poisonous tree" - which refers to indirect evidence.
Pretrial Identification - Lineup:
Suspect viewed by a witness in a lineup to identify.
A primary method for police to identify suspects.
Legal concern: whether the procedure is suggestive and violates the due process of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Booking:
Administrative record of an arrest detailing:
Offender's name, address, physical description, and date of birth.
Time of arrest, offense, and name of the arresting officer.
A Changing of the Rule with the Miranda Decision:
The Supreme Court has made modifications to the Miranda rule over the years, mostly relaxing the requirements.
The overall effect of the Miranda rule on law enforcement, such as lost convictions, remains minimal.
Miranda Warning:
Police must inform individuals in custody of their rights, particularly under the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination.
Rights Listed in Miranda Warning:
Right to remain silent.
Anything said can be used against them in court.
Right to consult with a lawyer before questioning.
Right to have a lawyer appointed if unable to afford one.
Right to decide freely whether to speak to police.
Waiver:
Officers must confirm understanding of rights and willingness to proceed with questioning.
Key Federal Legislation:
Federal Wiretap Act (1968, 1986).
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (1978, 2008).
Patriot Act (2001).
Local Technologies:
Advancements include surveillance cameras and GPS tracking devices.
The Plain View Doctrine:
Officers may seize evidence in plain view without a warrant if they are engaged in a lawful search with probable cause.
A crime observed in an officer's presence allows for a warrantless arrest.
Characteristics:
Do not require warrants or probable cause.
Voluntariness: consent must be given without duress.
Third-party Consent: Searches that come from consent by an individual other than the target of the search, like during bus sweeps.
Informed parties must feel "free to go" to ensure consent is valid.
Conditions for Search:
Probable cause: A fair probability evidence is present.
Not on Curtilage: Vehicle must be off the immediate property.
Apparently Mobile: Vehicle needs to appear drivable.
Conducted like a Warrant: Search procedures must follow warrant guidelines.
Apparently Mobile: Vehicle can seem functional; does not have to operate.
Not on Curtilage: If on private grounds, additional justification is needed beyond the auto exception.
Definition:
Fair probability of discovering evidence in a vehicle—absolute certainty is unnecessary.
The automobile exception allows searches for evidence and contraband without a warrant.
Permitted Searches:
If probable cause exists, cars can be searched without a warrant.
Scope includes driver, passengers, and any containers found inside.
Searches can be prompted by pretext stops or roadblocks but must remain reasonable.
Timing:
Must occur at the time of or immediately after an arrest.
Limited to the suspect and their immediate surrounding area.
Two Separate Acts:
Each requires the officer to have reasonable suspicion based on training and experience.
Definitions:
Includes danger of escape, evidence threats, or threats to individuals’ safety, such as in active shooter situations.
Exigent circumstances
Stop-and-frisk procedures
Searches incident to lawful arrest
Automobile searches
Consent searches
Searches based on plain view doctrine
Crimes committed in an officer's presence
Procedural Steps:
Knock and announce prior to entry.
Minimize property damage.
Use appropriate force.
Adhere to time constraints with search warrants.
Limit scope and manner of searches; restrict media presence.
Search specific items:
Items must be clearly and specifically named, e.g., electronic devices, firearms, drugs, etc.
Arrest warrant specifics:
Must specifically name individuals to be arrested.
Definition:
A reasonable belief relating an offense to specific people, places, or objects.
Sources of Information:
May include firsthand knowledge, informants, and anonymous or phone tips.
Probable cause.
Neutral and detached magistrate.
Particularity in the search warrant.
When are Warrants Required:
Required for searches/arrests in private homes or specific properties.
Needed for arrests of minor offenses not witnessed by the arresting officer.
Search Warrant:
Issued by a judge directing officers where to search and what to find.
Arrest Warrant:
Directs officers to arrest a specific individual.
Defining an Arrest:
An arrest is classified as a seizure per the 4th Amendment.
What is Not a "Search"?:
Abandoned property, open fields, and aerial flyovers do not count as searches.
Overview:
Governs searches and seizures with two critical clauses:
The reasonableness clause.
The warrants clause.
Key Questions:
What is deemed reasonable? Who determines this?
Can consistency in reasonableness be maintained across different cases?