Week 1 - Methods
Authority: an expert telling you information that you accept as true
External
Intuition: having a feeling something is true
Internal
Observation: knowing because you have experienced it
Balance between internal/external (trusting your senses + internalizing)
Observational problems:
Not always applicable, our senses aren’t perfect, and people can disagree
Observer bias: Expectation can influence observations/reality (fast vs slow rat study)
Empiricism: used to describe the conviction that accurate knowledge of the world can be acquired by observing it
Scientific method: procedures/rules for how we observe the world + fix observational problems
Theories: explanations of why something works based on observations
Hypothesis: predictions (if something is true, then __ should happen)
Experiments: testing hypothesizes to make a theory
Scientific skepticism: not getting attached to a prediction
Peer review: after you make a study, you send it to other scientists in the field to check it
Replication: multiple studies should produce similar data
Random sampling: selecting varying participants that have an equal chance of being included in the sample
Openness: all data should be public
Double-blind experiment: person collecting data/participant should not know the hypothesis
Falsifiable hypothesis: an explanation that can be true/false with observation
If this then that
Hypothesize:
Confirmatory studies: start with a hypothesis and find data that proves it
Exploratory studies: start without a hypothesis and find lots of data to come up with one
Operationalize:
Operational definition: a description of a psychological property in measurable terms
eg Can’t observe stage fright directly, need to measure something specific (heart rate)
Need construct validity: feature of operational def. that are good indicators of the property (eg smiling = happiness)
Measure:
Instrument: tool that measures operational definition (questionnaires, computer tasks, physiological measures)
Qualities of a good instrument
Internal validity: measures what it claims to
Reliability: similar each time
Power: detects small differences
Definition + instrument = data
Process of measurement:
Define the property (operational definition) → detect property (with a reliable instrument)
Report:
Peer review: receiving feedback from other scientists
Skeptical, check instruments, check data
Assumptions:
The scientific process needs necessary assumptions
Conclusions:
Internal validity: attribute of an experiment that allows it to establish causal relationships (everything inside the experiment is working how it is meant to)
External validity: attribute of experiment where variables can be described in a way that represents the real world
Types of Error:
Type 1 👎➕ concluding there is a causal relationship when there is not - false positive
Type 2 👎➖ concluding that there is not a causal relationship when there is - false negative
Frequency distribution: graph showing number of times a measurement occurs on each value (bar/line graphs)
Distributions:
Negatively skewed = leaning right
Positively skewed = leaning left
Normal distribution = symmetrical and “bell curved”
3 descriptions of central tendency
Mean: average value
Median: value in the middle of data
Mode: most frequent value
Variability: wideness of distribution
Range: largest value minus the smallest value
Standard deviation: describes how values in the frequency distribution differ from the mean
Naturalistic Observation: gathering information by uninteruptingly observing their environment (some things cannot be observed this way)
Demand characteristics: people acting differently in a setting where they know they are being watched/expected to do something
Ways to avoid demand characteristics:
Privacy - People feel more comfortable when they are anonymous
Unawareness - People being observed are unaware what they are being observed for
Measuring things people can’t control (pupils dialating)
Case studies: Procedure for gathering informationn by observing one individual
Correlational studies: A numerical prediction of relation between two measured variables (Is there a relationship between ___ and ___?)
Measure the variables in many subject, graph the data → estimate “direction” and “strength” (correlation coefficient)
Direction:
Positive correlation: the value of one variable increases, and the other variable increases
Negative correlation: the value of one variable increases, and the other variable decreases
No correlation: no pos or neg relationship
Correlation ≠ causation
Directionality problem: for any correlation, we don't know if one variable caused the other or if the other caused the first (a might have caused b, or b might have caused a)
Solution:
Third variable problem: a third unmeasured variable may be the cause for the measured one
Eg Ice cream sales and drowning incidents are correlated, but a third variable (temperature) influences both: hot weather increases ice cream consumption and swimming = more drowning incidents.
A situation where it seems like there is a causal relationship but isn't - Spurious correlations: strongly correlated variables that we know are not causally related
Solution:
Experiments: One variable is manipulated to see the causal effect on the other
Control group: doesn't receive the treatment being tested (not allowed to sleep)
Experimental group: does receive treatment being tested (can sleep normally)
Components of experiments:
Independent variable: the variable manipulated (eg amount of sleep)
Dependent variable: the variable measured (stress)
Random assignment: randomly assigning participants to groups
Random selection: should be representative of the population as a whole
Meta-analysis: combining data from (5-20) other published studies to get a more precise result
Averaging studies
Ethics code for the American Psychological Association:
Informed Consent: verbal agreement to participate in the study once knowing all risks involved
Freedom from coercion
Protection from harm: choose the safest methods
Risk-benefit analysis: participants may need to accept small risks but overall the benefits need to be grate
Deception: only when extremely necessary for the experiment
Debriefing
Confidentiality: anonymity
Respecting animals
CCAC Three Rs Tenet
Replacement: no alternative to animals
Reduction: using the smallest number of animals possible
Refinement: procedures need to minimize discomfort