AP PSYCH 6.4 Adolescent Development
Recall that school age had the industry vs. inferiority conflict
This period is characterized by identity vs. role confusion
Children at this age are trying new things and seeking an identity
Teens are trying to find what skills they have
They are learning to think independently of their peers and parents
Adolescents are usually given much more autonomy by their parents
If they aren’t given that autonomy and opportunities to explore themselves, teens can end up confused about their role
Recall that the previous stage was about learning to compare yourself
That skill endures as teens weigh their worth and roles in comparison to the people around them
This is a separate theory from Erikson
It concerns how we establish identity and rests upon two factors: exploration and commitment
Marcia sees identity as a process, not a conflict
The process may not look the same for everyone and the stages do not always come in the same order
Identities are not uniform across all development aspects and can differ in things like work, religion, and politics
The first stage is foreclosure, with low exploration but high commitment
The identity has not been explored very much, but the person is very committed to it
This is often the case when someone accepts the beliefs of their family or peers with no additional thought
We then move to diffusion, with low exploration and low commitment
Identity has not been thoughtfully considered or explored but the person is no longer committed to it
It has an inactive status
We move on to moratorium when we reach a crisis in life
When we feel like we are at a crossroads and need to make a decision, we begin exploring
This stage has high exploration but low commitment
This may happen in high school or a little later in life
Actively seeking and making decisions about the importance of certain beliefs and values, but options remain open and things change
The last stage is achievement, with high exploration and commitment
After active exploration and examination, individual values and goals have emerged
Identity is no longer changing but the person is confident enough to review their own beliefs when someone does rise to challenge them
Remember that the process may not always follow this trend, and it may happen multiple times in one person depending on what part of their life it is occurring in
Piaget places adolescents in the formal operational thought stage of abstract thought
This is also known as hypothetical thinking
This stage sees the ability to imagine how others view oneself
This leads to two phenomena called the imaginary audience and the personal fable
Because adolescents are so involved with ideas surrounding how others perceive them, they have adolescent egocentrism
Teens expect and behave as if people are always watching them and paying special attention to their behaviors
The imaginary audience is an adolescents tendency to believe that others are watching and evaluating them
It’s not uncommon for teens to feel this even when alone as if there was some sort of camera following them around
This leads to self-conscious behavior
The personal fable is an adolescent’s belief that they are special and unique
This also comes with the thought that none of life’s difficulties or problems will affect them, regardless of their behavior
This can be seen as risk-taking or making impulsive decisions
Risk-taking is a complex picture, so we use the biopsychosocial approach to explain it
Biologically, the pre-frontal cortex is not developed and it is unable to mediate the actions of the limbic system
The pre-frontal cortex handles prediction, decision-making, judgment, etc.
The limbic system, however, is very active at this age and controls emotion
Essentially, emotions end up outweighing logic
Socially, there is a disproportionate value placed upon the opinions of peers, which can influence behavior
Lastly, the personal fable makes up the psychological aspect of this phenomenon
Recall that school age had the industry vs. inferiority conflict
This period is characterized by identity vs. role confusion
Children at this age are trying new things and seeking an identity
Teens are trying to find what skills they have
They are learning to think independently of their peers and parents
Adolescents are usually given much more autonomy by their parents
If they aren’t given that autonomy and opportunities to explore themselves, teens can end up confused about their role
Recall that the previous stage was about learning to compare yourself
That skill endures as teens weigh their worth and roles in comparison to the people around them
This is a separate theory from Erikson
It concerns how we establish identity and rests upon two factors: exploration and commitment
Marcia sees identity as a process, not a conflict
The process may not look the same for everyone and the stages do not always come in the same order
Identities are not uniform across all development aspects and can differ in things like work, religion, and politics
The first stage is foreclosure, with low exploration but high commitment
The identity has not been explored very much, but the person is very committed to it
This is often the case when someone accepts the beliefs of their family or peers with no additional thought
We then move to diffusion, with low exploration and low commitment
Identity has not been thoughtfully considered or explored but the person is no longer committed to it
It has an inactive status
We move on to moratorium when we reach a crisis in life
When we feel like we are at a crossroads and need to make a decision, we begin exploring
This stage has high exploration but low commitment
This may happen in high school or a little later in life
Actively seeking and making decisions about the importance of certain beliefs and values, but options remain open and things change
The last stage is achievement, with high exploration and commitment
After active exploration and examination, individual values and goals have emerged
Identity is no longer changing but the person is confident enough to review their own beliefs when someone does rise to challenge them
Remember that the process may not always follow this trend, and it may happen multiple times in one person depending on what part of their life it is occurring in
Piaget places adolescents in the formal operational thought stage of abstract thought
This is also known as hypothetical thinking
This stage sees the ability to imagine how others view oneself
This leads to two phenomena called the imaginary audience and the personal fable
Because adolescents are so involved with ideas surrounding how others perceive them, they have adolescent egocentrism
Teens expect and behave as if people are always watching them and paying special attention to their behaviors
The imaginary audience is an adolescents tendency to believe that others are watching and evaluating them
It’s not uncommon for teens to feel this even when alone as if there was some sort of camera following them around
This leads to self-conscious behavior
The personal fable is an adolescent’s belief that they are special and unique
This also comes with the thought that none of life’s difficulties or problems will affect them, regardless of their behavior
This can be seen as risk-taking or making impulsive decisions
Risk-taking is a complex picture, so we use the biopsychosocial approach to explain it
Biologically, the pre-frontal cortex is not developed and it is unable to mediate the actions of the limbic system
The pre-frontal cortex handles prediction, decision-making, judgment, etc.
The limbic system, however, is very active at this age and controls emotion
Essentially, emotions end up outweighing logic
Socially, there is a disproportionate value placed upon the opinions of peers, which can influence behavior
Lastly, the personal fable makes up the psychological aspect of this phenomenon