Definitions
Utility = satisfaction from consuming goods/services.
Total Utility (TU) = cumulative satisfaction from all units of a product consumed.
Marginal Utility (MU) = extra satisfaction from one additional unit of a product.
Utility Schedule (Alison – Bottled drinks)
Bottles | TU | MU |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 | – |
1 | 30 | 30 |
2 | 50 | 20 |
3 | 65 | 15 |
4 | 75 | 10 |
5 | 83 | 8 |
6 | 89 | 6 |
7 | 93 | 4 |
8 | 96 | 3 |
9 | 98 | 2 |
10 | 99 | 1 |
Graphically: TU rises at a decreasing rate; MU curve slopes downward.
Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
As total consumption increases over a given time period, the MU from each extra unit falls.
Consumer’s Objective
Maximize total utility subject to: income, market prices, rational preferences, two-product assumption (X & Y).
Key rule: equate MU per last dollar across goods.
\frac{MUX}{PX}=\frac{MUY}{PY}
Income = \$10, Products: Apples (X, PX=\$1) & Oranges (Y, PY=\$2).
MU table (per unit):
| Unit | MUX | MUX/PX | MUY | MUY/PY |
|------|------|----------|------|----------|
|1|10|10|24|12|
|2|8|8|20|10|
|3|7|7|18|9|
|4|6|6|16|8|
|5|5|5|12|6|
|6|4|4|6|3|
|7|3|3|4|2|
Decision sequence (always buy highest MU/$ first): Y₁ → Y₂ → Y₃ → X₁ → X₂.
Expenditure: 2+2+2+1+1 = \$8 (stop when next best MU/$ is < existing).
Final purchase bundle achieves equality MUX/PX = MUY/PY = 8, leaving \$2 unspent or used on next-best equal utilities.
If P_Y drops from \$2 to \$1:
New MU/$ table (divide MU by 1): values double for oranges.
Consumer buys more oranges (up to 6 units in slide).
Implied individual demand for Y:
PY=\$2 → QY=4 (obtained earlier).
PY=\$1 → QY=6.
Market demand = horizontal summation of all individual demand curves.
Consumer Surplus (CS): Area under demand but above price.
Graphically: triangle/trapezoid between price line & demand curve.
Real income = purchasing power of money income.
Two distinct effects when a price changes:
Substitution Effect (SE) – movement along indifference curve caused by change in relative price, holding utility (real income) constant.
Income Effect (IE) – parallel shift to a new indifference curve from the change in purchasing power, holding relative prices constant.
Formal statements
SE: quantity demanded of a good rises when its relative price falls & vice-versa.
IE:
For normal goods: real-income ↑ → quantity demanded ↑.
For inferior goods: real-income ↑ → quantity demanded ↓.
Normal Good (price ↓):
SE ↑
IE ↑
Total: quantity ↑, therefore demand is negatively sloped.
Inferior Good (price ↓):
SE ↑
IE ↓
If SE > |IE| → overall ↑ (still downward-sloping).
If |IE| > SE → overall ↓ → upward-sloping (Giffen good).
Upward-sloping demand implies Giffen behaviour.
Wage = price of leisure.
Wage ↑ raises relative price of leisure (SE → work more).
Wage ↑ raises real income (IE → desire more leisure, work less)
Net labour-supply response depends on the relative sizes of SE vs IE.
Production function Q=f(L,K) shows max output from inputs Labor & Capital.
Economic profit \pi = TR - (Explicit\;costs + Implicit\;costs).
Accounting profit ignores implicit costs.
Example (Ruth's Soup):
TR = 2000, Explicit = 1160 → Accounting Profit = 840.
Implicit = 265 → Economic Profit = 575.
Total Product (TP), Average Product AP=TP/L, Marginal Product MP = \Delta TP/\Delta L.
Law of Diminishing MP: Adding more of a variable factor to fixed input eventually lowers MP.
Graph: MP intersects AP at AP’s maximum; TP flattens as MP ↓.
Total Cost TC = TFC + TVC.
TFC doesn’t vary with output.
TVC rises with output.
Averages: ATC=TC/Q, AFC=TFC/Q (declines continuously), AVC=TVC/Q.
Marginal Cost MC=\Delta TC/\Delta Q ; equals marginal variable cost.
U-Shapes explained:
As long as AP rising, AVC falling; once AP falls, AVC rises (mirror with MP & MC).
Variable-factor price ↑ → MC & ATC shift upward; fixed-factor price ↑ shifts ATC but not MC.
All inputs are variable; firms choose cost-minimizing input mix.
Cost-minimization condition:
\frac{MPK}{PK}=\frac{MPL}{PL} \quad \text{or} \quad \frac{MPK}{MPL}=\frac{PK}{PL}
Principle of Substitution: if PL rises relative to PK, firms substitute K for L.
Obtained from envelope of all possible Short-Run ATCs (SRATCs).
Typical "saucer-shape":
Economies of scale (downward) up to Q_M.
Minimum Efficient Scale (MES) at Q_M where LRAC minimum.
Diseconomies of scale beyond Q_M.
Relation to returns to scale:
Increasing RTS ⇒ Economies of scale; Constant ⇒ flat LRAC; Decreasing RTS ⇒ Diseconomies.
Market power = ability to influence market price.
Four structures (in ascending power): Perfect Competition → Monopolistic Competition → Oligopoly → Monopoly.
Many buyers & sellers; homogeneous product; perfect information; price-taking firms; free entry/exit.
Firm faces horizontal demand at market price p despite industry’s downward-sloping demand.
TR = p \times Q
AR = TR/Q = p
MR = \Delta TR/\Delta Q = p
⇒ For competitive firm: p = AR = MR.
Produce or Shut Down?
If p < AVC_{min} → Shut down (loss = TFC).
If p \ge AVC_{min} → Produce where MC = p.
Output Choice
Profit-maximization: choose Q where MC = MR = p (as long as p ≥ AVC).
Shut-Down Price: price at minimum AVC; below this, firm’s best option is zero output.
Alison’s TU/MU table shows diminishing MU.
Apple–Orange MU/$ tables demonstrate utility-max rule & derivation of individual demand.
Demand curves plotted at p=\$1 & p=\$2 for oranges (Q=6 vs 4).
Labor-supply indifference diagrams: SE & IE decomposition.
TP, MP, AP graphs: point of diminishing MP, AP peak correspond to cost minima (AVC & MC).
Cost curve diagrams show MC intersecting AVC & ATC at minima and SRATC envelope tangent to LRAC.
Consumer surplus measures benefit to buyers; policy changes (taxes, subsidies) can be evaluated via changes in CS.
Firms’ cost minimization affects resource allocation: substitution principle explains technological adoption (e.g., automation when labor costly).
Understanding SE & IE aids welfare analysis of taxation or welfare programs (work incentives).