Definition: Discursive psychology is a perspective rather than merely a method.
Approach: Moves away from traditional cognitivist frameworks toward understanding social actions through language.
Key Question: Focuses on what individuals accomplish through their spoken words.
Epistemological Stance: Adopts a social constructionist view, positing that knowledge is constructed through language.
Function: Highlights how individuals perform social and psychological work via their language use.
Transcription Importance: Transcription serves as a crucial initial step in analyzing discursive practices.
Focus: Identify and understand the discursive devices utilized to perform social and psychological activities.
Learning Objective: By the end, learners will recognize various discursive devices in conversations.
Always Occurring: Speech acts are aimed at performing social actions.
Example Statements:
Claiming knowledge: "I was walking down the street when I saw..."
Persuading: "You’re making me sad by not eating that."
Making Requests: "Could you check in the cupboard..."
Definition: Tools employed to achieve social actions through language.
Examples of Devices:
Expressing Emotions: Facial expressions, crying, talking about feelings, not taking turns.
Goal: Identify the devices in conversation.
Pronouns: Includes words like "I", "me", "us", etc. to categorize or reference individuals.
Footing Concept: Developed by Goffman, describes how speakers position themselves in relation to their statements.
Principal vs. Animator roles.
Structure: Typically involves a pairing of assessments.
Objective Assessment: "That was so delicious."
Subjective Assessment: "I thought that was really nice."
Strength Variations: Ranging from extreme case formulations to weaker expressions.
Situation: Group conversation assessing enjoyment.
Devices Used: Objective assessment, subjective follow-up, and completion tonality.
Situation: Child justifying refusal of food.
Dynamic: Adult suggests obligation, child's assessment counters evaluation; adult shifts focus to quantity.
Three-Part Lists: Commonly emphasize completion; often elicit reactions like applause in speeches.
Everyday Usage: Can clarify turn-taking or express thoroughness in listing.
Focus: Rather than proving emotional experiences, examines how affect displays manage social interaction.
Indicators: Crying, laughter, or vocalizations like "mmm" can signal emotions or responses.
Function: Used to preempt negative interpretations by framing perspectives positively before advocating a position.
Examples: "I’m not racist, but..."
Definition: Compares unlike things to deepen understanding or make assertions about behaviors.
Example: Describing someone as a "pig" to indicate messiness.
Use: Regular articulations of behavior, implying norms within social scripts.
Example Statements: "He always does that."
Distinction: Different from affect displays, these involve attributing emotional states.
Purpose: Clarifies behavior, accounts for actions, or denies responsibility.
Concept: Certain individuals hold exclusive rights to knowledge related to their experiences.
Example: An eater can assert "I don’t like this taste."
Purpose: Speakers inoculate their claims to ward off counterarguments or skepticism.
Example Statements: "I know I might say this, but..."
Bingo Activity: Identify and recognize different discursive devices in conversation through an engaging group activity.
Understanding Usage: Individuals utilize discursive devices to accomplish speech acts with significant social functions.
Interpreting Conversations: Similar segments can be analyzed through multiple devices, highlighting the importance of these applications in the study of discursive psychology.