When private solutions to externalities are not feasible, government intervention is necessary.
There are two broad approaches for government actions: Command and Control Policies, and Market-Based Policies.
Definition: Direct regulation of resource allocation by the government.
Application: Commonly used for environmental regulations (e.g., specifying required pollution reduction technologies for factories).
Challenges:
Governments may lack complete information about the most efficient methods to achieve pollution reduction.
Focus on specific technologies, not on the ultimate goal (reducing pollution).
Producers lack incentives to innovate or find more efficient methods since they are mandated to use specified technologies.
When It Works:
In cases where high compliance is needed for success (e.g., vaccination for diseases, which has positive externalities):
Vaccination not only benefits the individual but also contributes to herd immunity.
Command and control can ensure broad compliance necessary to effectively control a disease.
Definition: Government provides incentives to internalize externalities.
Corrective Tax:
Proposed by economist A.C. Pigou in the 1920s.
A tax equivalent to the externality amount that aims to lead to an efficient outcome.
Involves assessing the external cost to get the desired social optimal consumption level.
Situation:
Your roommate plays loud music for six hours, treating the marginal cost and benefits from only their perspective, ignoring external damages.
Analysis:
Marginal private benefit and cost curve versus marginal social cost curve, which includes external costs.
The goal is to shift from private equilibrium (6 hours) to social optimum (4 hours).
Solution via Tax:
Implement a $6 per hour tax for loud music to internalize the externality.
This tax increases the marginal private cost curve to equal the marginal social cost curve, encouraging reduction in consumption to reach the social optimum.
Definition: A subsidy is effectively a negative tax, incentivizing behaviors that generate positive externalities.
Example: Handwashing:
Washing hands has a private benefit but also yields societal benefits (positive externalities).
A government subsidy for hand washing shifts the marginal private benefit upward to the marginal social benefit.
Result: Encourages more hand washing to shift from private equilibrium to social optimum.
Valuing externalities can be complex and inaccurate, especially intangible ones (e.g., noisy neighbors).
High administrative costs may hinder tax implementation.
Resulting policies, such as quiet hours, may be used as a compromise solution.
Economists working in environmental economics focus on accurately determining external costs, aiming for better efficiency than traditional command and control policies.