Definition: An attitude is defined as a tendency to think, feel, or act positively or negatively towards objects in our environment (Masorene Banaji, 2010).
Key Elements:
Attitudes reflect feelings of positivity or negativity.
Can be directed towards people, ideas, behaviors, or physical objects.
Importance: Understanding attitudes helps predict behaviors based on how an individual feels about a certain situation or object.
Description: Attitudes that can be consciously accessed, reported, and controlled.
Examples: Attitudes towards products like iPhones are explicit since individuals can evaluate and state their preferences.
Characteristics:
Consciously controlled and easily articulated.
Can be influenced by social desirability.
Description: Evaluative responses that are automatic and occur outside conscious awareness.
Characteristics:
Difficulty in self-reporting; they can't be easily articulated.
Formed through early developmental experiences, more subconscious.
Sensitive to current emotional contexts.
Measurement: Commonly measured through the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
Setup: Involves categorizing words/images quickly into two categories (e.g., insects, flowers, pleasant, unpleasant) with varied pairing for measurement of implicit attitudes.
Function: Difficulty or error rates in categorization can indicate implicit biases (e.g., towards social groups based on ethnicity).
Applications: Used to assess various social attitudes including racial bias, gender associations, and more.
Results from Project Implicit (2022):
Data show significant biases in various attitudes based on gender, physical appearance, and race.
Trends indicate most respondents reflect higher biases towards certain groups.
Specific Attitudes: Better predict specific behaviors.
Example: Attitude towards attending a specific Taylor Swift concert vs. general opinion about her music.
High Accessibility: Attitudes that are frequently considered are easier to recall and can more accurately predict behavior (e.g., recent news about a celebrity).
Low Accessibility: Attitudes that are not frequently considered are less likely to influence decision-making.
Strong attitudes are more predictive of behavior than weak attitudes.
Example: Strong ethical concerns about climate change lead to more consistent eco-friendly purchasing decisions.
Dissonance is the discomfort experienced when behaviors contradict attitudes.
Resolution Strategies:
Change behavior to align with attitudes.
Change attitudes to align with behaviors.
Stanford Experiment Reflection:
Participants rated a boring task as enjoyable after lying about it for minimal compensation (e.g., $1).
Results showed significant attitude shifts for low monetary reward participants compared to high reward ($20).
Conclusion: Less justification for the behavior (lying) leads to greater attitude adjustment to resolve dissonance.
Grasshopper Study:
Participants given fried grasshoppers by mean vs. nice experimenters had differing levels of attitude change based on perceived intentions and rewards for the behavior.
Findings highlighted how the context of the experimenter influenced the need to reduce cognitive dissonance.
Relevance of COVID-19: Recent studies exploring attitudes towards vaccination showed that predicting vaccine acceptance relies heavily on attitudes towards vaccinations specifically, not vaccines in general.
Changing Implicit Attitudes: Exposure to positive images of activities (like exercise) has shown potential to alter implicit attitudes, although translating that to behavioral changes remains complex.
Understanding attitudes involves differentiating between explicit and implicit types, as well as exploring their dimensions (specificity, accessibility, strength).
Cognitive dissonance demonstrates a powerful mechanism by which behaviors can inform and transform attitudes.
Future research continues to unveil the complexities of attitudes, particularly in social behaviors and public health.