4.2: Price Discrimination, Oligopoly, and Game Theory
Price discrimination: the practice of selling the same products to different buyers at different prices
Eg. airplane tickets (eg. first v. business class), coupons, sporting event tickets (eg. adult v. senior)
Seeks to charge each consumer what they are willing to pay in an effort to increase profits → those with inelastic demand are charged more than those with elastic demand
Seeks to eliminate consumer surplus
Requires the following conditions:
Must have monopoly power
Must be able to segregate the market
Consumers must not be able to resell product
<10 Large Producers
Identical Or Differentiated Products
High Barriers To Entry
Control Over Price (price Maker)
Mutual Interdependence
Firms Use Strategic Pricing
Eg. OPEC, Cereal Companies, Car Producers
High Barriers To Entry Prevent Others From Entering
Types Of Barriers To Entry
Economies Of Scale
Eg. The Car Industry Is Difficult To Enter Because Only Large Firms Can Make Cars At The Lowest Cost
High Start-up Costs
Ownership Of Raw Materials
Game Theory: The Study Of How People Behave In Strategic Situations
An Understanding Of Game Theory Helps Firms In An Oligopoly Maximize Profit
Oligopolies Are Interdependent Since They Have To Anticipate And React To The Decision Of Competitors
In An Oligopoly, Pricing And Output Decisions Must Be Strategic As To Avoid Economic Losses
Game Theory Helps Determine The Best Strategy
dominant Strategy: The Best Move To Make Regardless Of What Your Opponent Does
Firm One
Firm Two
High | Low | |
---|---|---|
High | $100, $50 | $60, $90 |
Low | $50, $40 | $20, $10 |
Firm One Has A Dominant Strategy To Go High
Firm Two Does Not Have A Dominant Strategy
Oligopolies Must Use Strategic Pricing (they Have To Worry About The Other Firms)
Oligopolies Have A Tendency To Collude To Gain Profit
Collusion Is The Act Of Cooperating With Rivals In Order To “rig” A Situation
Collusion Results In The Incentive To Cheat
Firms Make Informed Decisions Based On Their Dominant Strategies
Collusion Is Illegal → Firms Cannot Set Prices
Price Leadership Is A Strategy Used By Firms To Coordinate Prices Without Outright Collusion
General Process:
“Dominant Firm” Initiates A Price Change
Other Firms Follow The Leader
Breakdowns In Price Leadership
Temporary Price Wars May Occur If Other Firms Don’t Follow Price Increases Of Dominant Firm
Each Firm Tries To Undercut Each Other
Cartels Are Colluding Oligopolies
Cartel: A Group Of Producers That Create An Agreement To Fix Prices High
Cartels Set Price And Output At An Agreed Upon Level
Firms Require Identical Or Highly Similar Demand And Costs
Cartels Must Have A Way To Punish Cheaters
The Kinked Demand Curve Model Shows How Non-collusive Firms Are Also Interdependent
Price discrimination: the practice of selling the same products to different buyers at different prices
Eg. airplane tickets (eg. first v. business class), coupons, sporting event tickets (eg. adult v. senior)
Seeks to charge each consumer what they are willing to pay in an effort to increase profits → those with inelastic demand are charged more than those with elastic demand
Seeks to eliminate consumer surplus
Requires the following conditions:
Must have monopoly power
Must be able to segregate the market
Consumers must not be able to resell product
<10 Large Producers
Identical Or Differentiated Products
High Barriers To Entry
Control Over Price (price Maker)
Mutual Interdependence
Firms Use Strategic Pricing
Eg. OPEC, Cereal Companies, Car Producers
High Barriers To Entry Prevent Others From Entering
Types Of Barriers To Entry
Economies Of Scale
Eg. The Car Industry Is Difficult To Enter Because Only Large Firms Can Make Cars At The Lowest Cost
High Start-up Costs
Ownership Of Raw Materials
Game Theory: The Study Of How People Behave In Strategic Situations
An Understanding Of Game Theory Helps Firms In An Oligopoly Maximize Profit
Oligopolies Are Interdependent Since They Have To Anticipate And React To The Decision Of Competitors
In An Oligopoly, Pricing And Output Decisions Must Be Strategic As To Avoid Economic Losses
Game Theory Helps Determine The Best Strategy
dominant Strategy: The Best Move To Make Regardless Of What Your Opponent Does
Firm One
Firm Two
High | Low | |
---|---|---|
High | $100, $50 | $60, $90 |
Low | $50, $40 | $20, $10 |
Firm One Has A Dominant Strategy To Go High
Firm Two Does Not Have A Dominant Strategy
Oligopolies Must Use Strategic Pricing (they Have To Worry About The Other Firms)
Oligopolies Have A Tendency To Collude To Gain Profit
Collusion Is The Act Of Cooperating With Rivals In Order To “rig” A Situation
Collusion Results In The Incentive To Cheat
Firms Make Informed Decisions Based On Their Dominant Strategies
Collusion Is Illegal → Firms Cannot Set Prices
Price Leadership Is A Strategy Used By Firms To Coordinate Prices Without Outright Collusion
General Process:
“Dominant Firm” Initiates A Price Change
Other Firms Follow The Leader
Breakdowns In Price Leadership
Temporary Price Wars May Occur If Other Firms Don’t Follow Price Increases Of Dominant Firm
Each Firm Tries To Undercut Each Other
Cartels Are Colluding Oligopolies
Cartel: A Group Of Producers That Create An Agreement To Fix Prices High
Cartels Set Price And Output At An Agreed Upon Level
Firms Require Identical Or Highly Similar Demand And Costs
Cartels Must Have A Way To Punish Cheaters
The Kinked Demand Curve Model Shows How Non-collusive Firms Are Also Interdependent