Growth of mass-produced suburban housing developments in the US after WWII: affordability and profitability goals
Concerns among residents and urban planners about the monotony and sprawl of American tract-housing developments
Emergence of the New Towns and Intentional Communities movements in the US during the 1960s, and the New Urbanism in the 1990s; gradual emergence of “master planned communities” in the US -- growing awareness of the “power of place” and its relevance to building cohesive communities
Individualized (1960s)
Incorporation of environmental psychology concepts and findings into practical design guidelines for creating more positive residential communities
Developers had a huge opportunity here with the influx of people returning from the war
There was a surge of optimism people wanted to start families
There was this ideal of owning your own home and having your nuclear family live in your own space so they began to develop places like Levittown, New York which was one of the first massively planned tract housing communities in the US
Started on Long Island and then when a US Steel opened a plant in Morrisville, Pennsylvania, the Levitt brothers moved in there
Saw a captive market of workers that were going to be moving there, living there, and they created Levittown, Pennsylvania
Planned Communities Movement
One of the foremost proponents of that was Ray Watson, the first president of the Irvine Company
Pictured doing some of his early design work for the city of Irvine
There was a dedication of his papers and a lot of his resources to the UCI library because he’s been a supporter of the urban planning program at UCI
There’s a million dollar endowed fellowship campaign within PDD to assist students in urban studies and planning
Erit Mayor
Did her master’s of urban regional planning in social ecology and PPD
Did a study of planned communities namely Irvine’s Woodbridge as compared to Fountain Valley so she did a comparative study of people’s reactions to those 2 places and some of the symbols and themes you find in plant communities are typified by Woodbridge where you have a very heavy emphasis on natural elements (2 human-made lakes, some views of the mountains, bike trails that surround the lakes, clear branding with the name of the village, fence and the small wall that goes around much of that property, etc.)
Irvine, California: emphasis on developing a strong sense of place through design guidelines
Columbia, Maryland: emphasis on promoting and sustaining racial integration
Woodlands, Texas: emphasis on habitat preservation and organic architecture and community planning
Systems theory and social ecology
Person-environment fit (or congruence)
Environmental symbolism; place-based and virtual settings
Environmental determinism; moderators of environmental influence
Physiological and psychological stress, learned helplessness, overload
Density and crowding; ceiling density, carrying capacity
Privacy, personal space, territoriality
Spatial proximity, functional distance, friendship formation
Intimacy gradients and defensible space
Impact of environmental stressors on behavior and health
Cognitive and behavioral mapping; imagability, legibility
Personality and environment (stimulation seeking, hardiness)
Environmental attitudes and assessments
Place identity, physical traces, identity claims
Behavior settings, over- and understaffing; third places
Influence of human behavior on environmental quality
Operant reinforcement, feedback, social norms, social praise
Human response to natural and technological disasters
Arcology
The fusion of architecture and ecology, emphasizing compact 3D settlements to counter urban sprawl and conserve natural resources
Featuring a walkable downtown with human scale
How do you make a community human scale and walkable and comfortable for pedestrians
A lot of emphasis on sittable space on street trees, an ice rink in the middle of the town where people can gather around and watch the kids skate, vendors where people set up shop and it creates a kind of social space that humanizes and bring that those tall buildings down to more of a human scale
A policy-oriented package of urban design goals, principles, policies, and suggested design guidelines for elements having majors impacts on the city’s form and character
Key Elements
Hierarchy of roads
Separating people from the freeway, high volume traffic, down to the inner cul-de-sacs that go through the residential areas
Freeways, north-south and east-west arterials, village collector roads, and cul-de-sacs
Streetscape design
To make the different levels of road very imageable and legible to people so they know where they are
Gradient from public to private
Going from one level of publicness or formality to a more private neighborhood so they texture the pavement. They put a kind of landscaping that announces that you’re going through an entry point to create that kind of gradient
Open space plan
The idea of creating several villages that people can choose among where they want to live
Residential villages
Village collector road, activity corridor which serves as sort of your high density nodes, people-made lakes to bring people into contact with nature, the university town center plan which originally when it was designed was intended to be much more mixed-used that we’re going to be people living on top of the shops in the shopping center but that didn’t quite past the muster with the planners
Recreational areas
Civic center
Commercial centers
Different age groups accommodated
Provision of residential villages that emphasize recreation and proximity to nature
Emphasis on safety, security, cleanliness, and order
Separation of residential areas from high-volume automobile traffic
Campus third places that contribute to UCI’s ambiance and place identity
Individuality/Community
Homogeneity/Diversity
Order/Disorder
A parable about place identity and the tension between individuality and communality in planned communities
Compared to Irvine, CA and other Planned Communities:
Greater emphasis on individuality
Less concern about orderliness
Greater emphasis on diversity
In terms of Altman & Chemers’ Qualities of Communities
Blend of individuality and community
Greater homogeneity than diversity
Strong emphasis on order and orderliness
One of the features of a planned community is that it has a long range plan that goes out a hundred years
Says exactly what’s going to happen each year in terms of what’s going where, how the land is going to be used
Elements related to housing, relating to commercial and retail space, relating to schools, churches
Perpetration of crime requires:
The presence motivated offender/s and suitable targets + environmental opportunities to carry out the crime (e.g., absence of capable guardians, “lurkable” environments, lack of defensible space)
(+) Associated with lower crime rates
(+) Strengthen secondary block territories and promote contact among neighbors
(-) May confuse motorists and impede emergency vehicle access
Landscaping is a very important part of the territorial system; can be as effective as a wall
Those features of an environment that serve to bring it under the control of its occupants; emphasis is on promoting residents’ opportunities for informal surveillance of secondary territories
Crime prevention programs at federal and state levels that combine Newman’s defensible space theory and environmental design recommendations with social, management, and law enforce strategies
Environmental Determinism - ignores the cognitive and behavioral processes underlying defensible space
Little attention given to the number of design factors necessary for defensible space and their relative importance
Too much emphasis on “defensive” neighborhoods that are divided along class and ethnic lines rather than on cohesive and culturally integrated communities
Methodological limitations related to sample selection and measurement issues
Environmental Psychology focuses on these psychological and behavioral processes that link the environment to specific behavioral or health outcomes
If the environment includes certain kind of symbolic barriers, actual barriers, detectability factors, and physical traces of residents’ presence, it’s going to create cognitions or certain kinds of feelings and perceptions in residents and burglars’ heads and that determines whether there’s going to be victimization or security so the physical environment is mediated by these psychological processes that then explain whether crime occurs or not
Symbolic Barriers (e.g., welcome mats, personalized signs, color schemes)
Actual Barriers (e.g., locks, alarms, guards, gates, walls)
Physical Traces of Presence or Absence (e.g., lights on in the home, car in driveway, TV sounds, uncollected mail or newspapers)
Detectability Factors (e.g., squeaky gates, barking dogs that influence the visual or auditory accessibility of a home and of people near or in the home)
Burglarized | Non-Burglarized |
---|---|
No symbolic identity markersAbsence of actual barriersLack detectability featuresFew if any traces of presencePublic street signs nearby | Symbolic identity markersActual barriers (e.g., fences)Detectability features presentTraces of presence, garagesFew if any public street signs |
These prominent stone columns at a neighborhood entry point indicate a transition from the public territory of the sidewalk and pacific coast highway to the secondary territory of the neighborhood
Actual barriers of Crystal Cove include a guard house and gate through which vehicles must pass to enter the neighborhood
These features are designed to strengthen residents’ sense of community and security
Examples of Symbolic and Actual Barriers
Changes in elevation and landscaping elements symbolically strengthen the boundary between secondary and primary territories in Crystal Cove
The bars on the windows exemplify an actual barrier between the secondary territory of the front yard and the primary territory of the home