An individual who surpasses their enemies gains wealth, benefiting friends while harming foes.
The individual makes adequate sacrifices to the gods, setting up magnificent offerings, showing more care for the divine and benevolent humans than a just person would.
Divine Favor
Because of sacrifices and offerings, it is likely that the gods will take better care of the unjust individual than the just one.
This presents the argument that unjust people enjoy a better life—both in terms of divine favor and social status—than just individuals.
Adeimantus' Intervention
Adeimantus challenges Socrates, claiming that Glaucon's position is not fully articulated.
He asserts that the praise of justice often centers around its social reputation and the advantages it brings, rather than the inherent value of justice itself.
Examining Justice vs. Injustice
Socrates agrees that the discussion must examine both sides of the argument—what justice provides versus what injustice allows.
The traditional societal praise for justice often reflects the benefits of being perceived as just (e.g., public office, marriage).
Consequences of Reputation
Claims of justice often hinge on reputation, leading people to discuss the consequences rather than the essence of justice itself.
The discussion introduces well-known poets like Hesiod and Homer who associate justice with divine favor and earthly rewards.
The Myth of Justice and Injustice
People often equate justice with hardship and injustice with ease, suggesting that unjust acts can sometimes yield greater benefits.
There are narratives suggesting that unjust people can hide their crimes from the gods through rituals or bribes.
Influence of Education
Young people's perspectives about justice and injustice are shaped by repeated narratives about morality from poets and society, presenting a skewed understanding of virtue.
They might arrive at conclusions like favoring deceit over righteousness based on societal teachings.
Flaws in Traditional Beliefs
Socrates points out that traditional beliefs fail to depict justice and injustice accurately; they often emphasize superficial rewards instead of intrinsic goodness.