Walter Benjamin's work "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (1935)
Explores how technological advancements in reproduction affect art and culture.
Power of Art: Traditional arts developed by individuals of lesser technological power than present.
Reflects on changes in the craft of beauty through technology.
Anticipates profound innovations that will impact artistic techniques and the individual's notion of art.
Historical Context of production: Marx's critique of capitalism assessed production conditions, leading to understanding future societal changes.
Emphasizes dialectics of art within the socio-economic context.
Highlights the transformation of art in relation to conditions of production.
Concepts like creativity and genius are re-evaluated under these conditions and are depicted as outdated under fascist interpretations of art.
Art has always been reproducible; methods have evolved from manual imitation to mechanical reproduction.
Historical examples:
Greeks limited to founding and stamping; unique works remained unreplicated.
Introduction of woodcuts marked the start of graphic arts becoming mechanically reproducible.
Advances like lithography and photography have transformed reproduction, fundamentally altering art's impact.
Films signify the height of reproduction technology, revolutionizing consumption of visual and auditory art.
Every reproduction lacks its unique existence in time and space, diminishing its 'aura'.
Authenticity tied to physical presence and tradition is jeopardized by reproducibility.
Authenticity anchors historical testimony; mass reproduction detaches art from tradition.
The concept of 'aura' captures the sense of uniqueness lost through reproduction.
Human sense perception adapts along with societal developments; historical shifts influence artistic expression.
Changes in perception reflect societal transformations and the influences of mass movements.
The aura of natural phenomena (e.g., mountains) illustrates the concept, where proximity diminishes uniqueness.
Art's unique value historically tied to its ritualistic functions; rituals have defined the perception of artistic works.
The rise of mechanical reproduction liberated art from these rituals, shifting focus from cult to political contexts.
Distinction between cult value (hidden accessibility) and exhibition value (public display).
Evolving art forms like photography challenge traditional notions of art.
Art begins with ceremonial, cultic objects; their value is increasingly reliant on public accessibility.
Examination highlights the nature of traditional versus contemporary art consumption.
Mechanical reproduction transforms art's purpose and challenges the sacredness of traditional forms.
Photography exemplifies the clash between cult value and exhibition value.
Early portraits maintained aura via personal connections, but as society shifted, this aura fades.
The rise of analytics and critical approaches to film and photography alters audience engagement.
Earlier debates on photography and painting underscore historical tensions affecting art.
The technological disruptions led to questions about art's purpose and nature.
Film's evolution adds complexity to understanding artistic integrity and authenticity.
Film differentiates the actor's performance; live actors present their embodiment directly, while film actors are mediated by cameras.
Pirandello's insights into the existential crisis of film actors highlight the loss of presence.
The relationship between audience and actor transforms in the context of film.
The transformative nature of acting in film emphasizes the crisis within the actor's identity.
Audience interaction with the camera changes conceptualizations of performance and presence.
Strangeness of the split between actor and audience marks a significant departure from traditional arts.
The film industry commodifies personalities; the notion of 'aura' diminishes as media changes.
The tension between mass media's distractions and art's authenticity explores modern disparities.
Benjamin critiques both aesthetic and political implications of mass art; Fascism and its aestheticization of war offer insight into contemporary challenges.
Calls for the politicization of art as a counter to fascist aesthetics, bringing forward the potential for art to reflect societal change.