Topic Overview: Sport, Climate Change, & Environmental Justice
Content aims to explore socio-cultural perspectives in kinesiology.
Credit: © Hayhurst, 2025
Definitions: Climate Change & Environmental Justice
Review of Sport’s Environmental Impacts (Chen & Kellison, 2022)
Videos featuring Dr. Maddy Orr and Dr. Liv Yoon
Introduction to Environmental Justice Paradigms: Distributive, Procedural, Recognition
Discussion & Reflection on key topics
Key Takeaways and Preview of Part 2
Define climate change and environmental justice.
Understand sport's role in environmental impacts.
Recognize three Environmental Justice paradigms:
Distributive
Procedural
Recognition
Apply intersectional thinking to discussions.
Consider historical and local contexts.
Engage emotionally and connect insights to practice.
Sport as a significant global industry with economic, social, and cultural influence.
Sport is both a contributor to and affected by environmental challenges.
Potential for transformative justice in sport management.
Defined as long-term shifts in temperature and weather patterns.
Primarily driven by human activities, especially greenhouse gas emissions.
Effects include: extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and disruptions to ecosystems (Chen & Kellison, 2022; Orr, 2024).
Beyond just rising temperatures: changing weather patterns, and extreme events.
Social and ecological disruptions:
Affects agricultural outputs, infrastructure, and public health (UN Women, 2019).
Sport-specific impacts, such as rising temperatures hindering playability (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
Deepening economic & social inequalities, especially affecting vulnerable communities.
Involves fair distribution of environmental benefits and burdens.
Ensuring marginalized communities actively participate in decision-making processes.
Acknowledges intersections of race, class, and power dynamics (Chen & Kellison, 2022; Pellow, 2004).
Aims for equal access to a healthy environment and fair decision-making (Chen & Kellison, 2022).
Requires involvement of all stakeholders, particularly marginalized communities.
Challenges systemic inequities rooted in colonialism and capitalism.
Calls for participatory, intersectional approaches in policy.
Sport facilities and events significantly use resources and generate waste.
Sport has potential for positive community engagement and advocacy.
Highlights tensions between economic growth and ecological impacts (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
PBS News segment highlighting how climate extremes are altering the sports landscape.
Reconciling heavy snowfall in Toronto with overall global warming trends.
Understanding the distinction between 'weather' and 'climate' aids sports organizations in adapting events and training.
Focus on distribution of environmental goods and harms.
Key issue: Inequitable sharing of resources and risks, e.g., pollution in low-income areas.
Focus on fairness in decision-making processes.
Key issue: Ensuring all voices are represented in planning and policies, e.g., adequacy of consultations during sport projects.
Focus on acknowledging diverse cultural and historical identities.
Key issue: Respecting connections of Indigenous and marginalized communities to the land, beyond superficial acknowledgments.
Environmental justice as an action-oriented concept to address power imbalances.
Importance for sport management research; opportunity to align practice with justice and transform practices for community benefit.
Links environmental harms with race, class, and gender issues (Chen & Kellison, 2022).
Low-income communities of color bear the brunt of pollution and displacement from sport developments.
Examination of whose input is absent in sport facility decision-making.
Recognizing overlapping identities (gender, race, class) in shaping experiences of environmental challenges.
Environmental issues are interlinked with broader socio-economic inequalities (Thomas, 2022).
Legacy of colonialism and systemic racism affecting land use.
Historical exclusion of Indigenous voices has lasting impacts on current environmental outcomes (Bullard, 1990).
Recognition of local contexts shaping ecological impacts and community vulnerability.
Importance of Indigenous and community-specific knowledge systems in sport development.
Focus on contributions from Dr. Liv Yoon regarding kinesiology's role in climate justice.
Reflect on sport’s role in addressing climate change.
Emotions evoked by the video: hope, urgency, concern?
Consideration of a trauma-informed, hopeful approach to discussions.
Climate change is a human-driven crisis with profound impacts (Chen & Kellison, 2022).
Environmental justice entails fair distribution, inclusive decision-making, and true cultural recognition (Chen & Kellison, 2022; Bullard, 1990; Whyte, 2018B).
Sport can both aggravate environmental degradation and offer transformative potential (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
An intersectional, historically informed, and emotionally resilient approach is crucial.
Sport, Climate Change, Enviro, Justice.
Topic Overview: Sport, Climate Change, & Environmental Justice
Content aims to explore socio-cultural perspectives in kinesiology.
Credit: © Hayhurst, 2025
Definitions: Climate Change & Environmental Justice
Review of Sport’s Environmental Impacts (Chen & Kellison, 2022)
Videos featuring Dr. Maddy Orr and Dr. Liv Yoon
Introduction to Environmental Justice Paradigms: Distributive, Procedural, Recognition
Discussion & Reflection on key topics
Key Takeaways and Preview of Part 2
Define climate change and environmental justice.
Understand sport's role in environmental impacts.
Recognize three Environmental Justice paradigms:
Distributive
Procedural
Recognition
Apply intersectional thinking to discussions.
Consider historical and local contexts.
Engage emotionally and connect insights to practice.
Sport as a significant global industry with economic, social, and cultural influence.
Sport is both a contributor to and affected by environmental challenges.
Potential for transformative justice in sport management.
Defined as long-term shifts in temperature and weather patterns.
Primarily driven by human activities, especially greenhouse gas emissions.
Effects include: extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and disruptions to ecosystems (Chen & Kellison, 2022; Orr, 2024).
Beyond just rising temperatures: changing weather patterns, and extreme events.
Social and ecological disruptions:
Affects agricultural outputs, infrastructure, and public health (UN Women, 2019).
Sport-specific impacts, such as rising temperatures hindering playability (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
Deepening economic & social inequalities, especially affecting vulnerable communities.
Involves fair distribution of environmental benefits and burdens.
Ensuring marginalized communities actively participate in decision-making processes.
Acknowledges intersections of race, class, and power dynamics (Chen & Kellison, 2022; Pellow, 2004).
Aims for equal access to a healthy environment and fair decision-making (Chen & Kellison, 2022).
Requires involvement of all stakeholders, particularly marginalized communities.
Challenges systemic inequities rooted in colonialism and capitalism.
Calls for participatory, intersectional approaches in policy.
Sport facilities and events significantly use resources and generate waste.
Sport has potential for positive community engagement and advocacy.
Highlights tensions between economic growth and ecological impacts (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
PBS News segment highlighting how climate extremes are altering the sports landscape.
Reconciling heavy snowfall in Toronto with overall global warming trends.
Understanding the distinction between 'weather' and 'climate' aids sports organizations in adapting events and training.
Focus on distribution of environmental goods and harms.
Key issue: Inequitable sharing of resources and risks, e.g., pollution in low-income areas.
Focus on fairness in decision-making processes.
Key issue: Ensuring all voices are represented in planning and policies, e.g., adequacy of consultations during sport projects.
Focus on acknowledging diverse cultural and historical identities.
Key issue: Respecting connections of Indigenous and marginalized communities to the land, beyond superficial acknowledgments.
Environmental justice as an action-oriented concept to address power imbalances.
Importance for sport management research; opportunity to align practice with justice and transform practices for community benefit.
Links environmental harms with race, class, and gender issues (Chen & Kellison, 2022).
Low-income communities of color bear the brunt of pollution and displacement from sport developments.
Examination of whose input is absent in sport facility decision-making.
Recognizing overlapping identities (gender, race, class) in shaping experiences of environmental challenges.
Environmental issues are interlinked with broader socio-economic inequalities (Thomas, 2022).
Legacy of colonialism and systemic racism affecting land use.
Historical exclusion of Indigenous voices has lasting impacts on current environmental outcomes (Bullard, 1990).
Recognition of local contexts shaping ecological impacts and community vulnerability.
Importance of Indigenous and community-specific knowledge systems in sport development.
Focus on contributions from Dr. Liv Yoon regarding kinesiology's role in climate justice.
Reflect on sport’s role in addressing climate change.
Emotions evoked by the video: hope, urgency, concern?
Consideration of a trauma-informed, hopeful approach to discussions.
Climate change is a human-driven crisis with profound impacts (Chen & Kellison, 2022).
Environmental justice entails fair distribution, inclusive decision-making, and true cultural recognition (Chen & Kellison, 2022; Bullard, 1990; Whyte, 2018B).
Sport can both aggravate environmental degradation and offer transformative potential (Wilson & Millington, 2020).
An intersectional, historically informed, and emotionally resilient approach is crucial.