Course Title: Quantitative Research Revision
Instructor: Dr. Jonathan P. Ivy
Institution: Lancaster University
Part Identifier: Part 1
Firm Objective
Information Requirement
Problem Definition/Objectives
Data Availability Assessment
Secondary Data Utilization
Research Design
Data Analysis
Presentation
Advantages and Disadvantages
Sources of Secondary Data
Market Orientation
Strategic Orientation
Problem Orientation
Data Manipulation Techniques:
t-tests and Cross Tabs
Chi-square
Experimental Design and ANOVA
Multivariate Techniques
Types and Sources of Bias
Frequency and Ease of Use
Country or Regional Specific Bias
Issues in Primary Data Collection
Establish the need for information
Specify research objectives
Determine research design
Develop data collection procedure
Design sample
Collect data
Process data
Analyze data
Present research results
Importance of preliminary analysis leading to the research decision.
Types of problems to identify:
Problem of choice
A symptom
List necessary information needed (BADI).
Brainstorm information requirements and acquisition methods.
To determine...
To identify...
Information-oriented approach.
Identify needed information and feasible acquisition methods.
Management Decision Problem: Improve store patronage at Orchard St Branch.
Market Research Objective: Identify strengths and weaknesses of Orchard St Branch compared to competitors.
Acts as a blueprint for conducting research.
Details procedures to achieve research objectives.
Exploratory Research:
Generates hypotheses or understanding of dimensions.
Qualitative Methods: Focus groups, interviews.
Conclusive Research:
Gathers definitive data to inform decisions.
Quantitative Methods: Surveys (mail, telephone, etc.).
Internal Data vs. External Data
Ready to Use vs. Requires Further Processing
Published Materials
Computerized Databases
Syndicated Services
Purpose: Understand underlying motivations.
Characteristics: Small non-representative sample, unstructured.
Purpose: Quantify data, generalize results to population.
Characteristics: Large representative sample, structured.
Focus Groups
In-depth Interviews
Projective Techniques
Observation
Designed to evaluate alternatives for decision-making.
Telephone Surveys
Personal Surveys
Mail Surveys
In-Home Surveys
Mall Intercept Surveys
Electronic Surveys (E-mail, Internet)
Assigning numbers or symbols to characteristics based on rules.
Focus on measuring consumer perceptions rather than individuals.
Structured Format: Fixed questions with tick boxes.
Importance of response formats and scaling in design.
Open-ended Questions: Avoid one-word responses.
Use prompts and adjust between interviews as needed.
Complete censuses are often impractical due to population size.
A sample is a subgroup selected for study.
Census: Complete enumeration of the population.
Sample: Subgroup selected for research purposes.
Nonprobability Sampling: Convenience, Judgmental, Quota, Snowball.
Probability Sampling: Systematic, Stratified, Cluster, Simple Random.
Selection of field workers
Training of field workers
Supervision of field workers
Validation of field workers
Timing and budgeting considerations
Data analysis as a critical aspect, but other factors matter more.
The importance of problem definition, methodology, and data processing highlighted.
Identify trends, patterns, and exceptions in data.
Statistical software (e.g., SPSS) significantly aids the analysis process.
Handling large volumes of data (audio, videos, transcripts).
Techniques for simplification: basic quantification and restructuring.
Use of frequencies, mean scores, and standard deviations.
Chi-squared tests, t-tests, ANOVA, correlations, regression, multivariate analysis (e.g., factor analysis, discriminant analysis).
Consider the audience: clarity in graphs and definitions.
Address information needs relating to objectives.
Maintain objectivity and conciseness in reports.
Title: Revision Using an Example
Presenter: Dr. Jonathan P. Ivy
Institution: Lancaster University
Role: International Recruitment Manager for Major University in the UK.
Task: Present findings and recommendations on international recruitment strategy.
Respondents (669 total): 44.1% male, 55.9% female.
63.5% prefer to study abroad instead of at home (given no limitations).
Analyzed preference for home country in university selection by gender.
Male: 49.6% yes, Female: 50.4% yes.
Significance of results shown in table with chi-square score and significance level identified.
Both genders indicated a preference for studying abroad.
Significant difference: females (67%) are more likely than males (59%) to choose studying abroad.
Consider developing gender-specific strategies in marketing and school visits.
Breakdown of respondents: 44% male, 56% female.
Educational levels: 13% in school, 63% in Bachelors, 25% in Post Graduate.
Gender vs. Education level cross-tabulated.
No significant difference found between genders across educational qualifications.
No significant differences between genders regarding education qualification.
Marketing strategies do not need differentiation based on education profile.
Statistical representation of differences in perceptions about studying in the UK.
T-tests used to compare means between genders on various statements regarding UK studies.
T-values, significance levels, and p-values noted across assessment statements.
Importance of clear and well-structured statistical representation.
Adjustments to charts and tables to enhance communication of results.
No significant differences in likelihood of acceptance at UK universities.
Discussion on parental influence and ranges of responses among genders noted.
Gender perceptions on parental desire indicate significant differences.
Opportunities for targeted marketing based on parental involvement highlighted.
Gender-specific marketing activities recommended based on attitudes found.
Significance determination amongst variable comparisons and the focus on post hoc tests.
Comparison of standard deviations between different groups highlights differences.
Significant differences noted in confidence across educational levels.
Similarity in leisure expectations across different educational groups without significant differentiation.
School leavers less likely to view university as a break; suggests marketing should focus on career development.
Strongest correlation with teaching quality in relation to likelihood to apply.
Highlighting the explanatory power (R-square) of independent variables in predicting likelihood to apply.
Discussion on the significance of the F-value in validating regression models.
Clarity on defining the model and independent variables impacting the likelihood to apply.
Discussion on how relevant education significantly influences willingness to apply to a UK university.
Forecasting impact of strategic improvements on applicant likelihood metrics.
Emphasis on clear communication and suitability of responses in report compilations.
Encouraging note for students and well-wishes for upcoming breaks.
Revision slides HE study 2020
Course Title: Quantitative Research Revision
Instructor: Dr. Jonathan P. Ivy
Institution: Lancaster University
Part Identifier: Part 1
Firm Objective
Information Requirement
Problem Definition/Objectives
Data Availability Assessment
Secondary Data Utilization
Research Design
Data Analysis
Presentation
Advantages and Disadvantages
Sources of Secondary Data
Market Orientation
Strategic Orientation
Problem Orientation
Data Manipulation Techniques:
t-tests and Cross Tabs
Chi-square
Experimental Design and ANOVA
Multivariate Techniques
Types and Sources of Bias
Frequency and Ease of Use
Country or Regional Specific Bias
Issues in Primary Data Collection
Establish the need for information
Specify research objectives
Determine research design
Develop data collection procedure
Design sample
Collect data
Process data
Analyze data
Present research results
Importance of preliminary analysis leading to the research decision.
Types of problems to identify:
Problem of choice
A symptom
List necessary information needed (BADI).
Brainstorm information requirements and acquisition methods.
To determine...
To identify...
Information-oriented approach.
Identify needed information and feasible acquisition methods.
Management Decision Problem: Improve store patronage at Orchard St Branch.
Market Research Objective: Identify strengths and weaknesses of Orchard St Branch compared to competitors.
Acts as a blueprint for conducting research.
Details procedures to achieve research objectives.
Exploratory Research:
Generates hypotheses or understanding of dimensions.
Qualitative Methods: Focus groups, interviews.
Conclusive Research:
Gathers definitive data to inform decisions.
Quantitative Methods: Surveys (mail, telephone, etc.).
Internal Data vs. External Data
Ready to Use vs. Requires Further Processing
Published Materials
Computerized Databases
Syndicated Services
Purpose: Understand underlying motivations.
Characteristics: Small non-representative sample, unstructured.
Purpose: Quantify data, generalize results to population.
Characteristics: Large representative sample, structured.
Focus Groups
In-depth Interviews
Projective Techniques
Observation
Designed to evaluate alternatives for decision-making.
Telephone Surveys
Personal Surveys
Mail Surveys
In-Home Surveys
Mall Intercept Surveys
Electronic Surveys (E-mail, Internet)
Assigning numbers or symbols to characteristics based on rules.
Focus on measuring consumer perceptions rather than individuals.
Structured Format: Fixed questions with tick boxes.
Importance of response formats and scaling in design.
Open-ended Questions: Avoid one-word responses.
Use prompts and adjust between interviews as needed.
Complete censuses are often impractical due to population size.
A sample is a subgroup selected for study.
Census: Complete enumeration of the population.
Sample: Subgroup selected for research purposes.
Nonprobability Sampling: Convenience, Judgmental, Quota, Snowball.
Probability Sampling: Systematic, Stratified, Cluster, Simple Random.
Selection of field workers
Training of field workers
Supervision of field workers
Validation of field workers
Timing and budgeting considerations
Data analysis as a critical aspect, but other factors matter more.
The importance of problem definition, methodology, and data processing highlighted.
Identify trends, patterns, and exceptions in data.
Statistical software (e.g., SPSS) significantly aids the analysis process.
Handling large volumes of data (audio, videos, transcripts).
Techniques for simplification: basic quantification and restructuring.
Use of frequencies, mean scores, and standard deviations.
Chi-squared tests, t-tests, ANOVA, correlations, regression, multivariate analysis (e.g., factor analysis, discriminant analysis).
Consider the audience: clarity in graphs and definitions.
Address information needs relating to objectives.
Maintain objectivity and conciseness in reports.
Title: Revision Using an Example
Presenter: Dr. Jonathan P. Ivy
Institution: Lancaster University
Role: International Recruitment Manager for Major University in the UK.
Task: Present findings and recommendations on international recruitment strategy.
Respondents (669 total): 44.1% male, 55.9% female.
63.5% prefer to study abroad instead of at home (given no limitations).
Analyzed preference for home country in university selection by gender.
Male: 49.6% yes, Female: 50.4% yes.
Significance of results shown in table with chi-square score and significance level identified.
Both genders indicated a preference for studying abroad.
Significant difference: females (67%) are more likely than males (59%) to choose studying abroad.
Consider developing gender-specific strategies in marketing and school visits.
Breakdown of respondents: 44% male, 56% female.
Educational levels: 13% in school, 63% in Bachelors, 25% in Post Graduate.
Gender vs. Education level cross-tabulated.
No significant difference found between genders across educational qualifications.
No significant differences between genders regarding education qualification.
Marketing strategies do not need differentiation based on education profile.
Statistical representation of differences in perceptions about studying in the UK.
T-tests used to compare means between genders on various statements regarding UK studies.
T-values, significance levels, and p-values noted across assessment statements.
Importance of clear and well-structured statistical representation.
Adjustments to charts and tables to enhance communication of results.
No significant differences in likelihood of acceptance at UK universities.
Discussion on parental influence and ranges of responses among genders noted.
Gender perceptions on parental desire indicate significant differences.
Opportunities for targeted marketing based on parental involvement highlighted.
Gender-specific marketing activities recommended based on attitudes found.
Significance determination amongst variable comparisons and the focus on post hoc tests.
Comparison of standard deviations between different groups highlights differences.
Significant differences noted in confidence across educational levels.
Similarity in leisure expectations across different educational groups without significant differentiation.
School leavers less likely to view university as a break; suggests marketing should focus on career development.
Strongest correlation with teaching quality in relation to likelihood to apply.
Highlighting the explanatory power (R-square) of independent variables in predicting likelihood to apply.
Discussion on the significance of the F-value in validating regression models.
Clarity on defining the model and independent variables impacting the likelihood to apply.
Discussion on how relevant education significantly influences willingness to apply to a UK university.
Forecasting impact of strategic improvements on applicant likelihood metrics.
Emphasis on clear communication and suitability of responses in report compilations.
Encouraging note for students and well-wishes for upcoming breaks.