Multiple working labels
“Psychotherapy” (Jerome Frank) → planned, emotionally-charged, confiding interaction between trained, socially-sanctioned healer & sufferer whose aim is relief of distress/disability.
“Psychological treatment” (Barlow, 2004) → interventions that:
Derive from psychological science.
Target causal/maintenance psychological processes of specific disorders.
Demonstrate efficacy in controlled outcome studies.
Supportive ↔ Change-oriented.
Directive ↔ Non-directive.
Problem-focused ↔ Personality-focused.
Evidence-based ↔ Non evidence-based.
Manualized ↔ Non-manualized.
Choice of therapeutic model.
Behavioral → learning-based behavior modification.
Cognitive-Behavioral → change maladaptive thoughts & behaviors.
Dialectical → emotion regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal skills.
Mindfulness/Acceptance → relational-frame metaphors & experiential exercises.
Psychodynamic → insight into unconscious forces.
Client-Centered/Humanistic → growth via unconditional positive regard.
Pre-contemplation → no intent to change.
Contemplation → aware/problem recognized; no commitment.
Preparation → intent & initial steps.
Action → overt behavior change.
Maintenance → sustain change.
Termination / Relapse → upward spiral learning from lapses.
Psychoanalytic → Psychodynamic.
Humanistic models.
Behaviorism (three waves):
First wave: Behavioral.
Second wave: Cognitive-Behavioral (CBT).
Third wave: Acceptance-based (ACT, DBT).
Freud → psychoanalysis (method + theory).
“Psychodynamic” = broadened, derivative approaches.
Psychic determinism: all mental events are caused.
Unconscious motivation.
Instinctual drives: Eros vs. Thanatos.
Structural model: Id (pleasure), Ego (reality), Superego (morality) → intrapsychic conflict.
Psychosexual stages: Oral, Anal, Phallic, Latency, Genital.
Anxiety types: Reality, Neurotic, Moral.
Ego-defense mechanisms: repression, projection, reaction formation, displacement, fixation, rationalization, denial, sublimation (defense use linked to psychopathology).
Free association.
Dream analysis (manifest vs. latent content).
Analysis of resistance.
Analysis of transference.
Examination of everyday behavior & early life.
Interpretation.
Neo-Freudians: Jung, Adler, Rank…
Object-relations theory.
Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT; Klerman & Weissman).
Strupp’s Interpersonal Dynamic Psychotherapy (focus on relationship disturbances, corrective emotional relationship, cyclical maladaptive patterns).
Facilitate expression of affect.
Explore avoidance/defenses.
Identify recurring patterns.
Link past to present.
Emphasize interpersonal relations.
Work with transference in therapy relationship.
Explore fantasy life (dreams, uncensored thoughts).
Origins of pathology: incongruence between self-view & external expectations (vs. unconscious conflict).
Human nature: inherently positive/optimistic.
Therapist’s role: facilitator; client is expert on self.
Client-Centered Therapy (Carl Rogers).
Existential Therapy.
Gestalt Therapy (Fritz Perls).
Phenomenological tradition: phenomenal field & phenomenal self.
Goal: self-actualization (Maslow’s hierarchy – physiological → self-actualization).
Growth promoted when necessary & sufficient conditions present:
Empathic understanding.
Unconditional positive regard.
Genuineness/congruence.
Therapist “does” vs. “does not” lists:
DO: reflections, allow free expression, weekly sessions.
DO NOT: advice, reassurance, persuasion, questions, skills teaching, interpretations, criticism.
Whole > sum of parts; emphasis on present-moment awareness.
Techniques: here-and-now focus, attending to non-verbals, responsibility, role-play (“empty-chair”).
Strengths
Emphasize subjective experience, free will, growth, present moment, therapeutic relationship.
Limitations
Over-focus on feelings; constructs vague/immeasurable; minimal assessment; research base weaker; terminology obscure.
Scientific rigor; focus on observable behavior; avoid unmeasured constructs.
John B. Watson (Little Albert).
Mary Cover Jones (counter-conditioning with Peter).
Joseph Wolpe (systematic desensitization).
B.F. Skinner (operant conditioning).
Bandura & Rotter (social-learning → cognitive elements).
First: Strict behaviorism.
Second: Cognitive additions (CBT).
Third: Acceptance/mindfulness (ACT, DBT).
Classical Conditioning: UCS, CS, UCR, CR; acquisition, extinction, generalization.
Operant Conditioning: reinforcement (↑ behavior) vs. punishment (↓ behavior); positive vs. negative contingencies.
Flooding (prolonged, maximal exposure).
Graduated exposure via fear/anxiety hierarchy.
In-vivo vs. imaginal; commonly combined with response-prevention.
Principles for maximal effect: long sessions, varied settings, hierarchy, full attention, no avoidance, end with fear reduction, can be stand-alone or multicomponent.
Application example: PTSD exposure (Edna Foa).
Problem assessment.
Technique rationale.
Relaxation training (PMR).
Construct anxiety hierarchy.
Scripted pairing of relaxation with hierarchy items → counter-conditioning.
Token economies, time-outs, successive approximation (shaping), Premack (Grandma’s rule).
Antabuse for alcohol; bitter nail polish for nail-biting, etc.
Activity monitoring/scheduling, mastery & pleasure tasks, goal-setting, positive reinforcement, reduce avoidance, skills rehearsal. Effective alone or with CBT.
Rationale → modeling, role-play, homework, feedback.
Distinguish passive, assertive, aggressive styles.
Target definition & baseline measurement.
Functional analysis (A→B→C) & plan.
Implementation (session & natural env.; homework).
Outcome assessment (ongoing measurement).
Reformulation if insufficient change.
Strengths: efficacy (meta-analyses show behavioral > psychodynamic/humanistic), efficiency (fewer sessions), broad applicability.
Criticisms: skill-demanding, terminology off-putting, seen as cold/directive, limited focus on “inner growth”.
Beck & Ellis influenced by social-learning (Bandura, Rotter).
Response to limitations of behaviorism; integration of cognition + learning.
2010s → transdiagnostic focus, mechanisms > DSM categories; CBT = most evidence-based, widely taught; online CBT can equal face-to-face efficacy (Miller et al., 2021).
Activating event → Beliefs → Consequences (emotion/behavior). Thinking causes emotion & behavior.
Identify irrational beliefs (demandingness, awfulizing, low frustration tolerance, conditional acceptance).
Directive, disputational debates + behavioral homework.
Developed for depression.
Negative Cognitive Triad → automatic thoughts.
Cognitive restructuring steps: identify thoughts, examine evidence, generate rational responses.
Tools: Dysfunctional Thought Record, Downward Arrow.
Common thinking errors: all-or-nothing, overgeneralization, mental filter, catastrophizing, personalization, etc. (lists provided in slides 68–69).
Depression: BA + cognitive restructuring; sessions 8–16.
Social anxiety: rehearsal, exposure, cognitive work; sessions 16–20.
General anxiety, panic, PTSD, bulimia, substance use – multicomponent CBT programs (see slide 76 for session counts).
Phases: Conceptualization → Skill acquisition/rehearsal → Application; goal = “inoculate” against future stress.
Strengths: high effectiveness, efficiency, diverse techniques, aligns with health-training, wide disorder coverage.
Weaknesses: can feel cold, not growth-oriented, less suited for vague problems, debate over primacy of cognition.
Designed for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) [DSM-5 criteria: 5 of 9 symptoms such as abandonment fear, unstable relationships, identity disturbance, impulsivity, suicidal behavior, affective instability, chronic emptiness, anger, transient paranoia/dissociation].
Components: weekly individual therapy + group skills training.
Core Mindfulness (observe, describe, participate).
Distress Tolerance (bear pain skillfully).
Emotion Regulation.
Interpersonal Effectiveness.
Dialectics balance acceptance & change, validation & confrontation; wise mind = synthesis of emotion & rational mind.
Motto: Accept, Choose, Take action.
Six “hexaflex” processes fostering Psychological Flexibility:
Acceptance.
Cognitive Defusion.
Present-moment contact.
Self-as-Context (observing self).
Values identification.
Committed action (values-guided goals).
Techniques rely on metaphors (e.g., “Passengers on the bus”), experiential exercises, Values Bull’s-Eye worksheet.
Therapist stance: collaborative, vulnerable, non-expert.
ACT & DBT outperform no-treatment; usable across ages/formats; ACT not superior to other CBTs; DBT resource-intensive.
Debate over novelty vs. traditional CBT overlap.
Expert role, catharsis, therapeutic alliance, anxiety reduction, mastery/competence.
Distress level, intelligence, age, openness, gender, ethnicity/social class.
Age, sex, ethnicity, personality, empathy/warmth/genuineness, own therapy, degree/experience.
Efficacy → controlled RCTs (high internal validity) | Effectiveness → real-world practice (external validity).
RCT gold standard; case studies & pre-post single groups weaker evidence.
Eysenck 1952 review: 72\% medical care improvement vs. 44\% psychoanalysis vs. 66\% eclectic → spurred research despite methodological flaws.
Smith, Glass, & Miller 1980 meta-analysis:
475 studies, 25{,}000 patients, avg 16 sessions.
Avg client better than 80\% of untreated.
Effect sizes: Cognitive-Behavioral 1.13; Systematic Desensitization 1.05; overall mean 0.85.
Psychodynamic: mixed; short-term slightly inferior to other txs at follow-up (Svartberg & Stiles 1991); others show equivalence (Crits-Christoph 1992).
NIMH Depression Collaborative Project (efficacy): CBT, IPT, Imipramine+CM, Placebo+CM all improved; medication favored severe depression; psychotherapy sufficient for mild/moderate; differential relapse patterns at 18-month follow-up.
Consumer Reports 1995 effectiveness survey (~7{,}000 respondents): majority reported improvement; few differences across provider type; longer treatment associated with better outcomes (methodological caveats: self-report, retrospective, sampling bias).
EBT = intervention with beneficial effects in RCTs.
EBP = integration of EBT evidence, clinician expertise, & client preferences.
Resistance: “art vs. science” debate; possible rival explanations for improvement (placebo, spontaneous remission, regression to mean, effort justification, multiple treatment interference, reporting bias).
Most formal therapies outperform informal help/placebo.
No single therapy universally superior, yet certain methods show disorder-specific efficacy (e.g., exposure for anxiety).
Common factors significantly contribute to outcome.
Therapist/client characteristics matter but evidence mixed.
Choice of model tailored to client needs, stage of change, cultural/contextual factors.
Manualization & fidelity vs. clinician flexibility.
Necessity of ongoing assessment (baseline, outcome, reformulation) for accountability.
Debate over scientific rigor vs. humanistic values (e.g., warmth vs. manual adherence).
2004 – Barlow proposes “psychological treatment.”
5/9 DSM-5 criteria for BPD diagnosis.
7 common psychodynamic features (Shedler).
3 waves of behavior therapy.
Smith et al.: 475 studies, 25\,000 pts, 80\% better off, mean ES 0.85.
NIMH project: 250 pts, 4 conditions, 3 sites, 18-month follow-up.
Multicomponent CBT programs: sessions range 8–24.