in this video video we will talk about political parties in texas so let's get a definition down
political party like-minded individuals and groups that join together to run candidates for
political office you're trying to find people that think like you join together
and put people in positions of power so that they can make decisions that you
like it's not a governmental institution that sounds weird but it's not
it is a it is a generally a private mechanism parties are private entities even though
they try to get power in our government they're not part of
the government nowhere in the constitution our political parties mentioned
so uh they're just uh they're like-minded and they work in and around
and for government but they're not necessarily government institutions
uh one important to uh think thing to think about is that they are simply mechanisms or
uh the the means of achieving power and influence that's that's what they want
they want power that gives them influence in the policy making and then they hopefully get what they
want uh major parties are coalitions of interest groups
that means there are different groups that want specific things that come
together under a larger party the democratic party and the republican party
if you get inside of that party there are many different groups that want different things they want to prioritize
different things maybe they want to prioritize certain economic policies or certain religious policies or certain uh social
policies foreign policy so but you have these different groups that
come together and usually they have the same overarching what they call ideology
which is a guiding theory of how government should work and what government should do
so major parties are a coalition of interest groups minor parties tend to not be they
usually are they have a single issue that they care about which we'll talk about uh in a few minutes
uh party platforms are the statement of goals and guiding
principles of a party every election cycle a political party will put forth their
platform and that's simply their goals that they want to achieve and the principles on
which they base those goals there is a desire as a political party
there's a desire to appeal to as many people as possible without alienating the core membership so you've got your
hardcore republicans you've got your hardcore democrats and other political parties libertarians whatever well every
party wants to grow their party so you have to find ways to appeal to people that aren't already in your party
but you can't offer those people too much or so much
that that appeals to them as it might upset the people that are
already in the party you don't want to alienate your core party membership by trying to change
your philosophy or change your party attitudes or platforms to appeal
to others now um background structure i mentioned before parties political parties are not
mentioned in the constitution uh they're not mentioned in the con u.s
constitution says constitutions i would say constitution they're not mentioned in the u.s
constitution because the founding fathers distrusted political parties they understood people like james
madison understood that eventually people will come together
in groups to try to achieve political power and influence politics which are
basically interest groups and political parties but they didn't want to uh embed them in
the constitution they felt that it was best that they didn't mention them and maybe they
wouldn't grow organically which they did but as i said said factions
inevitably factions are just groups of people with a common purpose factions inevitably will form to
influence government and those will be political parties there's different types of um
groups within political parties uh the first one we were going to talk about is party and the electorate
electorate is just those that vote the electorate in partying the electorate the goal is
to develop a loyal following every political party wants people that follow them blindly that's in a perfect world
they'll believe whatever the party says no matter what they say so uh if you can get that you can tell them
what they want to hear and they will do what you want them to do and what and you will do what they want you to do
because you are telling them what you are going to do if that makes any sense
then there's also party identifiers uh self-identifying members
if you call yourself a republican or you call yourself a democrat you are very
very likely to vote for that party's candidate and you're more likely to donate time
and money so that makes perfect sense if you're not willing to say i'm a republican or i'm a democrat then you're
less likely to always vote that way or donate time and money but if you do
call yourself that if you are a party identifier i am a democrat i am a republican that means you are
pretty much a shoo-in to vote for that party now you're also seeing a recent rise in
those identifying as independents those that don't adhere to either political
party they may lean towards one or the other but they don't necessarily
self-identify in this chart uh it shows generations
and how they uh view this was from 2004 to 2016. so it's
a little bit old but it still probably ties in uh works well today it doesn't
include of course the current uh jenna i mean uh gen z so uh the silent generation that's the
uh the old older generation older than boomer uh generation baby boomer
generation so they'll be the world war ii generation uh in the last looks like they're going by
the last uh 12 years they've alternated to be
up to 2016 to identify first as uh democrats then through 10 and 12 more leaning
towards republican and and then heavily uh republican in the last
you know from 12 for 14 to 16.
so they are more leaning currently and it extends out to 20 and 22 for the most
part most likely republicans uh baby boomer generation uh also tends to vote republican uh
these days but by a less wide margin than the silent generation generation x uh tends
to vote uh democratic more now this is uh across uh
the united states this is not texas so let's keep that in mind texas would all be uh red
if uh if if this uh was done by by this state or according to what texans how texans
vote are identified and then millennials who are the youngest of this group um
by a wide margin identify more with democrats than republicans because democrats blue
or lean blue or lean red which is republican
and that ties into other statistical
anomalies within identification the older you are you tend to be more conservative the younger
you are you tend to be more liberal and that um that makes sense
now you also have party organization um not the people but the but the offices
it's the formal structure of the political party and its leadership uh their job is to year-round coordinate
party behavior uh they're that they they're around even when the election
time is not here because they are out recruiting candidates to run in future
elections they're trying to find people that uh have the same values
uh believe in the same platform and you know have those capabilities that a cam
you want in a in a candidate somebody that's personable maybe somebody that has a lot of money somebody that uh
doesn't mind going and asking people for money um somebody that looks good in front of a
camera whatever so they try to record recruit and support candidates
they're vital the party organization in developing and especially maintaining the party brand a party brand is what we
stand for basically a party is saying this is who we are and this is what we stand for
there are different levels of party organization the lowest level is the precinct level
every county in texas uh has four
is divided into four precincts and a political party that is functioning properly will have a chairman of each
precinct so there should be four precinct chairpersons for each political party within a
county then you'll have a county chairperson that works at the county level
they run the elections locally and they do the geo tv which is get out the vote whenever you see geo tv
that means get out the vote then you have the state level uh
a chairman and a committee that makes decisions and their main job
is fundraising making money raising money and supporting local candidates
supporting those that are running on the county level supporting those that are running for state representatives state
senate and then you have the national level and at that you have the national
committee and the national chair most people that don't pay close attention to politics
do not know who's on the national republican or democratic committee and who the chair of the national republican
or democratic committee is uh now somebody that pays close attention and is a hardcore
member of the political party they might know that but most the average person will not know this person
um on the national level their job is branding and motivation because they
have the money they have access to the media so they have a great capability to be able to
let people know well this is who we are this is what we stand for these are the issues that matter
now we also have party in government these are party identifiers who've been elected so basically the people that won
office as a republican or as a democrat and their job is to achieve the goals of
the party they they were campaigners they were candidates first then they won
now once you win and achieve the seat as a us representative as a governor as
a state senator as a city you know county commissioner whatever now you want to achieve the goals of the party
and you personal goals as well but you want to achieve goals of the party as well
each party within government in the state of texas when you go to the texas state
legislature or the u.s congress the u.s legislature they have conferences or
caucuses depending on what they how they term them republicans usually
call them groups their republican conferences the democrats call them democratic caucuses
they are smaller groups of people like kind of like a subcommittee that set their legislative agenda and
plan tactics for achieving the agenda okay so they're sitting there and they come together as a group and they say
okay we're in office now and we're either a majority in congress or a minority in congress
and based on whether they're majority or minority they have to have a plan to achieve what they want to achieve
and they also elect the party leaders for that session and generally they are two year sessions
uh on the national level uh party leadership you have the house representatives which is the lower level of
of uh congress the leader is the speaker of the house you also have a house majority leader
for the party that is in the majority so if the democrats are in the majority in the house representatives then they
will have this usually have the speaker of the house and they will have a house majority leader
the speaker of the house is elected by the entire house of representatives the majority
leader is elected only by the members of the majority party same with the house minority leader it is only voted on by
members of the minority party or the party that does not have the most persons
in the house representatives and then below them are what's called uh the
majority whips or the minority whips which are basically uh members that are
whose job is to go out and persuade uh the members of their party to vote
how the party leadership wants them to vote i always think of it in terms of trying to whip the party into shape
that a lot kind of makes me remember what a whip is in the senate they don't have an
equivalent of the speaker of the house but they do at the national level have a senate majority leaver majority leader a
senate minority leader and majority and minority whips just like they have in the house and each one
each party has the members in committees and uh and has positions of leadership
in those committees uh and of course if you're a member of the majority party you're more likely to
have a leadership position in the committees of the house representatives or the senate
um now congress house representatives
senate they have a relationship with the executive branch too not just the national level but the state legislature
has a relationship with the governor they have to they have to work together the party that has control of the
executive branch usually has some advantages in congress mainly they can the executive branch can
veto anything the legislature does and that is a good tool to persuade them to do things or not do things that
displease the executive branch the party opposing the executive branch
uses the executive branch as a target as a as a negative target saying
do what we want you know come with us as the minority party the opposing party
of the executive branch because you know you don't want a bunch of people that agree with the governor or
agree with the president
now political parties in texas there are four officially recognized political parties in texas that have
access to the ballot that means that in any given election they can run somebody and don't have to
jump through special hoops that our very very minor party might have to do that is the democratic
party the republican party the libertarian party and the green party
now historically the democratic party has dominated
texas politics of course this was back when the democratic party in texas was a very
conservative party uh texas voted for democratic presidential candidates in
every election from 1848 9 with the exception of 1928
the last democratic president to win texas was in 1976
uh that was jimmy carter the last democratic presidential candidate twin texas was jimmy carter in
1976 so that's almost 40 uh more than 40 years almost 50 years
now now we know civil war and after civil war there was reconstruction with in reconstruction was uh when the
republicans uh the national republicans came down and uh basically militarily occupied texas and
uh implemented republican and elected republican governors
and the um after governor e.j davis in 1874
the only uh governors in texas until 1979 were democrats
okay so every governor after 1874 in texas was a democrat until 1979.
uh now in the 1800s late 1800s and the early
1900s or the 19th and early 20th century the republicans were the progressive
party uh the party that kind of uh wanted to use government for proactive
change and the democrats were the conservative party but that flipped
about the time of the new deal the great depression and the new deal and franklin
roosevelt becoming president so once the new deal became a part of
the government legislation the democrats split nationally
the northerners went with roosevelt and went with the national republican party and became much more progressive
much more liberal the the southern uh democrats
while they remained democrats by name they became very cons they stayed conservative and
maintained conservative values and uh promoted conservative laws within texas
but starting in the 70s the conservative democrats began
shifting over to their what is their id what they might call their ideological home their
conservative home which is the modern republican party and since that has happened uh
republicans have won consistently in texas and since 2003
they've basically dominated all the statewide offices in texas so
the modern texas uh political environment is dominated by
republicans who are conservative uh now let's talk about party
identification basically party identification is support and loyalty to a certain
political party that makes perfect sense now political ideology let's talk about
that i've mentioned that a couple of times already political ideology is a set of principles and ideals about the
purpose and role of government in a society okay what government should do how it should
do it when it should do it so that's ideology now they're the main ideologies or the
predominant ideologies in america are liberalism or also called progressivism
and now these are just basic definitions it's a little more complicated than this but
just if you want to kind of summarize it in an overarching definition these work pretty well so liberalism is uh or
progressives believe government can be useful in proactively solving social and economic problems
so if you see a problem in society be it a social problem an economic problem let's the government can do things they
have the power to do things to fix it so they should consider those things
conservatism is kind of the opposite they want to conserve the status quo they believe
that problems should not be solved by government but instead revolt resolve themselves organically on their own
now this by looking at it through the prism
of these descriptions generally what you will find is those that have are suffering or are
oppressed or not successful under the status quo or how things are going
they tend to be more liberal because if they are not benefiting from the economic system or
if they're being discriminated against or oppressed by the status quo well they think the government should be proactive
in helping to solve that problem they don't like the idea of just sitting around and waiting for it to resolve
itself organically so they tend to be more progressive or more liberal so
oftentimes uh poorer people tend to be more liberal more progressive because
they are poor minority races tend to be more liberal because what they tend to
not have as much power and as much say and oftentimes feel like they are being
discriminated against within society so they think things should change they don't want to sit around and wait of
course the most conservative people are the ones that benefit the most from
uh this status quo or how things are and statistically the most conservative
people in america and in texas uh are white men because white men tend to have
the most positions of power they have the power in government they predominantly have power in business and
education and all those things so they like the power they like that um
that is the status quo they don't want it to change that makes them conservative and then you have a moderates
that are have a blend of liberal and conservative ideas often times you will have people that may be conservative economically
but liberal socially uh those tend to fall into the category of a um of a
libertarian so uh so those are the ideologies liberalism conservatism and moderates
now political socialization all of us
believe what we believe politically and have our ideologies and have our philosophies of how we think the world
should work not because we were born that way it's because we learned it
we learned it and that in the process of learning your ideology your worldview your
political identification is called political socialization and there are many factors that
that shape your your ideology and how you're politically socialized including your family of
course that's number one because you're around them more than anybody so chances are
your political philosophies and ideas are going to reflect very closely your families
then your peers the people you are around all the time that's not family your schools your schools teach you
things about our government they teach you things about our society our
you know the norms of our society so that shapes you
your religion or lack of religion shapes how you view things so your church
or [Music] if you go to church or go to a synagogue or whatever that's going to shape you
and then the media of course that's very important because we are constantly bombarded by media and when i say media
it could be anything it could be you watching the news it could be you watching a television show
or a streaming something on netflix a movie music can
have a have a socializing impact shape the way you think about things
books newspapers basically anything that you absorb
as knowledge or as you know information can impact your um how you view the
world and in turn how you view your you know how the world should work
now partisanship um partisanship is strong and sometimes blind adherence to
a particular party a faction a cause or even a person
so if you you blindly believe anything a party tells you
and i say blindly i mean there are limits to that i think but if you are
very inclined to believe everything your party tells you everything a faction or an interest group tells you everything a
person of power or influence tells you then you are a partisan okay you are a partisan
now the problem with our world today is partisan polarization it's partisan polarization is the degree
to which democrats and republicans have become unwilling to diverge from their
party ideology in order to compromise basically
they the the two parties don't listen to each other anymore especially at the national level you get some compromise at the
local level uh less so at the state level and then very little at the national
level and part of the problem with individuals
regular people voters becoming sucked into this partisan polarization
is media because media today exists in such a way
that you can get inside of what i like to call an ideological bubble and never
get out what that means is you can if you wish you can any newspaper you read
any especially news program on television or any news on the internet
you can always find something excuse me and read something or watch
something that agrees with your preconceived ideas
so you are never challenged in your own beliefs and when you are never challenged you no longer see or even
consider the validity of any other options with regard to policy
or philosophy or anything else part of being a critical thinker is
being challenged in your beliefs and actually objectively looking at things
and deciding well you know maybe i am not right all the time but if you are always watching news or always uh on the
internet and websites that always agree with you and you never actually
look at or consider alternate opinions or points of view well then you
get into that ideological bubble and you become more and more polarized you you
not only just think that the the opposition disagrees with you you might even go to the extent to think the
opposition is evil or that they are they don't have the best interests of the
country in mind they're not the loyal opposition they're the traitorous opposition and that is a very dangerous dangerous
thing for a democracy one of the one of the primary
necessities of a functioning democracy is that the the two major sides in the democracy
must accept the fact that uh that they both are uh
it's called the loyal opposition we oppose each other we may oppose each other greatly as far as what we think is
right for the country or what economic policy or what social policy we disagree completely but we know that we are both
loyal to the united states of america and we are both loyal to the the idea of
this country prospering we just see it prospering in different ways
and the ideological bubble that has been created with the internet and with cable news and
has changed that to where now we've devolved into this
this nation where we distrust our very neighbors simply because of how they think politically and it's a dangerous
dangerous thing uh party identification in texas um
political party texas voters self-identify with uh republicans 40
democrats 25 independents 29 and third party candidates or third
parties such as libertarian or green party or something like that about six percent
now we always talk about democrats and republicans but take a look at that purple slice take a look at that number
of independents that identify in texas those are people that they may lean one
way for a while but generally because they call themselves independence they're willing
to change their vote they're likely to actually be one of those people that
looks to both parties looks to both ideologies and say to themselves hmm
maybe you know this alternative is better for this election instead of the
the party that i've voted for in the past and so the key especially for democrats because they're the ones that
are way behind in texas they will they need to do their best to appeal to
independents in order to become relevant again
and then like i said third-party movements in texas historically uh that we've had them around uh one of the
first important ones in the in texas especially but it was a nationwide third party was uh la raza unida or the united
race party and it was spearheaded by hispanic americans that were dissatisfied with the democratic party
in the 1970s they felt like that they were ignoring the concerns
of the hispanic american population so they created their own party uh and it was a while they didn't win any
nationwide elections or even any statewide elections they were very influential because
you know it was a it was important enough and there was enough members that the major parties wanted their votes so
they would try to appeal to them the green party of texas promotes grassroots democracy social justice ecological
wisdom peace and non-violence they're actually more liberal into the i guess you would
call it to the left of the democratic party and in the libertarian party of texas
they believe in limited government and i talked about this before fiscal conservatives and social liberals
uh generally the republican party is made up of uh fiscal conservatives and
social conservatives uh they think the government shouldn't really say a whole lot or tell people what to do
financially or fiscally in the economy but they can
conservative republicans tend to be very comfortable with telling uh people you know morally how they
should live their lives in in placing standards to how people should live their lives now um
libertarians they they're on board with that uh fiscally
but they tend to be less um concerned with how people live their individual
lives socially than uh republicans
other political and social movements uh these are still around they were more predominant in uh
you know decades ago or so but the the impact of them is still is around that is the occupy
movement uh occupy movement is a protest against the influence of big corporations and wall
street on american politics and then of course uh the tea party which is a republican faction of
anti-tax anti-business regulation people that tend to you tend to find
them in the republican party