Effective leadership is contingent (aka depends on) on matching a leader’s style to the right situation.
Low LPC (57 below)
Task motivated
Need to accomplish the task first and then getting along with group
More concerned about being successful and achieving goals
Relationship are important after the task has been completed
Medium LPC (58-63)
Independent
Self-directed
Somewhat removed from the situation
Not concerned with how the group may view them
Not overly concerned about the task
High LPC (64 or higher)
Relationship motivated
See the positive in group members and enjoy the interpersonal connections
Care about completing the tasks after they build good relationships with group members
Task motivated
Relationship Motivated
Situation:
Leader-Member relations
Confidence, loyalty, attraction to the leader
Task structure
Requirements clearly stated or vague
Position power
Authority strong or weak
By using a leader’s LPC score and the 3 situation variables, you can predict the effectiveness of the leader.
Basics:
Defines goals
Clarifies path
Removes obstacles
Provides support
Definition: The effectiveness of the leader rests on how the behavior of the leader influences followers satisfaction and performance.
Follower satisfaction and performance.
It’s about how leaders MOTIVATE subordinates to accomplish designated goals.
Different situations require different behaviors.
Different Leader Behaviors
Directive (aka task)
Give instructions abourt task, whats expected, how to do it, timeline for competion, rules and regulations clear, clear standards for performancepleasant
Supportive (relationship)
Friendly and approachable
Attends to well-being of subordinates
Makes workplace plesant
Treats subordinates as equals and respects them
Participative
invites subordinates to share in the decision making
consults with subordinates
listens to their ideas and opinions
integrates suggestions from subordinates as how the organization will proceed
Achievement-oriented
challenges subordinates to perform at the highest level possible
establishing high standards of excellence and seeking continuous improvement
shows a high degree of confidence in capabilities of subordinates
Subordinates (followers)
Need for affiliation
preference for structure
desire for control
self-percieved level of task ability
These characteristics determine the degree of satisfaction with the leaders behavior.
Are the subordinates satisfied with the behavior of leader?
Remember: the leader's effectiveness rests on how the leader's behavior influences follower satisfaction and performance.
Task Characteristics
Briefly, the nature of the task will influence the behavior of the leader and will ultimately impact the satisfaction of the subordinates
Defined
ambiguous
How does it work irl?
Use directive leadership when:
Subordinates are authoritarian and dogmatic
Task is ambiguous and unclear
Use supportive leadership when
Subordinates are need affiliation and acceptance
task is repetitive and boring
Use participative leadership when:
Subordinates are autonomous and need to have a control
Task is ambiguous, unclear, unstructured
Achievement-oriented leadership when:
subordinates have high expectations and need to excel
task is ambiguous, challenging, and challenging
Final Words on Path-Goal Theory:
It can be used by leaders at any level for all types of tasks
A leader must assess subordinates and tasks to determine appropriate leadership behavior to be used
Reminds us that the CENTRAL PURPOSE of leadership is to help subordinates define and reach the goal in the most efficient manner
And roles of followership
Followership:
Leaders can only exist and accomplish extraordinary goals because they have supportive followers. One cant exist without the other
“If you think you are leading and no one is following, you’re only taking a walk” - John Maxwell
LMX Theory
Leaders develop a separate exchange relationship with each individual member
Both the leader and the member define the role of that member
Low exchange relationship
Members need to only comply with formal roles, requirements, duties, rules, etc.
Aka show up, do your job, get out.
High exchange relationship
Members seek desirable outcomes that the leader controls, such as greater status, influence, and benefits.
In turn, the member is loyal and committed to the leader
How do you get from a low exchange to a high exchange?
Phase 1 - stranger
Low exchange, roles are scripted, one-way influence
Phase 2 - acquaintance
mixed exchange, roles are tested, mixed influence
Phase 3 - Partner
High exchange, roles are negotiated, reciprocal influence
The LMX theory suggests that the nature of relationships with the leader cause 2 groups to form among the members.
The IN-group and OUT-group.
In group (more: time, attention, opportunities, responsibilities)
Willing to do more than required
More innovative/creative
Get more responsibilities
Get more opportunities
Get more of the leader’s time and support
Out Group (less time, just doing the job)
Operate strictly within prescribed role
Do what’s required and nothing more
Treated fairly but do not get special attention from the leader
Receive standard benefits
So what should an effective leader do according to the LMX theory:
Develop special relationships with each member
Offer all members opportunities to take on new roles and responsibilities
Nurture high-quality exchanges
Look for ways to build trust and respect with each one
Be aware of how we communicate with and relate to our members